Structural modification of 19-norprogesterone i: 17-alpha-substituted-11-beta-substituted-4-aryl and 21-substituted 19-norpregnadienedione as new antiprogestational agents

ABSTRACT

Disclosed are compounds having the general formula: 
     
       
         
         
             
             
         
       
     
     wherein R 1 -R 4  and X are as defined herein, pharmaceutical compositions including such compounds, and a method of treating a patient involving antagonizing the endogenous progesterone, such as in inducing menses and treating endometriosis, dysmenorrhea, endocrine hormone-dependent tumors, meningiomas, uterine leiomyomas, or uterine fibroids, inhibiting uterine endometrial proliferation, inducing cervical ripening, inducing labor, and in contraception.

CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 09/180,132, filed May 24, 1999, which is a 371 ofPCT/US97/07373, filed Apr. 30, 1997, and which claims the benefit ofU.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/016,628, filed May 1,1996.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to the field of steroids and, inparticular, to novel 17-α-substituted, 11-β-substituted-4-aryl and21-substituted 19-norpregnadienedione analogs which possess potentantiprogestational activity with minimal antiglucocorticoid activity.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

There have been numerous attempts over the past few decades to preparesteroids with antihormonal activity. These have been reasonablysuccessful where antiestrogens and antiandrogens are concerned. However,the discovery of effective antiprogestational and antiglucocorticoidsteroids has proved to be a formidable task for the steroid chemist. Ithas been generally recognized for some years, however, thatantiprogestational steroids would find wide applicability in populationcontrol, while antiglucocorticoids would be extremely valuable in thetreatment of, for example, Cushing's syndrome and other conditionscharacterized by excessive endogenous production of cortisone. In thelast decade, largely through the efforts of Teutsch, et al. of theRoussel-Uclaf group in France, a new series of 19-nortestosteronederivatives has been synthesized with strong affinity for theprogesterone and glucocorticoid receptors and with markedantiprogestational and antiglucocorticoid activity in vivo. Thisimportant discovery revealed the existence of a pocket in theprogesterone/glucocorticoid receptors that is able to accommodate alarge 11β-substituent on selected 19-nortestosterone derivatives. Bysuitable selection of such a substituent, steroids with antihormonalproperties were obtained.

The pioneering studies of Teutsch, et al. on the synthesis ofantiprogestational and antiglucocorticoid steroids is summarized in arecent review article (G. Teutsch in Adrenal Steroid Antagonism. Ed. M.K. Agarwal, Walter de Gruyter and Co., Berlin, 1984. pp. 43-75)describing the work leading to the discovery of RU-38,486, the firststeroid of this type selected for clinical development. RU-38,486 ormifepristone was found to be an effectiveantiprogestational/contragestative agent when administered during theearly stages of pregnancy (IPPF Medical Bulletin 20; No. 5, 1986). Inaddition to these antiprogestational properties, mifepristone has verysignificant antiglucocorticoid activity and was successfully used byNieman, et al., J. Clin. Endocrinology Metab., 61:536, (1985)) in thetreatment of Cushing's syndrome. In common with the vast majority ofsteroidal hormone analogs, mifepristone additionally exhibits a range ofbiological properties. Thus, for example, it exhibits growth-inhibitoryproperties towards estrogen-insensitive T47Dco human breast cancer cells(Horwitz, Endocrinology, 116:2236, 1985). Experimental evidence suggeststhat the metabolic products derived from mifepristone contribute to itsantiprogestational and antiglucocorticoid properties (Heikinheimo, etal., J. Steroid Biochem., 26:279 (1987)).

Ideally, for purposes of contraception, it would be advantageous to havecompounds which possess antiprogestational activity without (or withminimal) antiglucocorticoid activity. Although there have been a numberof attempts to modify the mifepristone structure in order to obtainseparation of the antiprogestational activity from theantiglucocorticoid activity, this goal has not yet been fully achieved.As such, there remains a need in the art for the development of newsteroids which possess antiprogestational activity with minimalantiglucocorticoid activity.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides new steroids which possess potentantiprogestational activity with minimal antiglucocorticoid activity.More particularly, the present invention provides compounds having thegeneral formula:

wherein: R¹ is a functional group including, but not limited to, —OCH₃,—SCH₃, —N(CH₃)₂, —NHCH₃, —NC₄H₈, —NC₅H₁₀, —NC₄H₈O, —CHO, —CH(OH)CH₃,—C(O)CH₃, —O(CH₂)₂N(CH₃)₂, —O(CH₂)₂NC₄H₈ and —O(CH₂)₂NC₅H₁₀; R² is afunctional group including, but not limited to, hydrogen, halogen,alkyl, acyl, hydroxy, alkoxy (e.g., methoxy, ethoxy, vinyloxy,ethynyloxy, cyclopropyloxy, etc.), acyloxy (e.g., formyloxy, acetoxy,priopionyloxy, heptanoyloxy, glycinate, etc.), alkylcarbonate,cypionyloxy, S-alkyl, —SCN, S-acyl and —OC(O)R⁶, wherein R⁶ is afunctional group including, but not limited to, alkyl (e.g., methyl,ethyl, etc.), alkoxyalkyl (e.g., —CH₂OCH₃) and alkoxy (—OCH₃); R³ is afunctional group including, but not limited to, alkyl (e.g., methyl,methoxymethyl, etc.), hydroxy, alkoxy (e.g., methoxy, ethoxy,methoxyethoxy, vinyloxy, etc.), and acyloxy; R⁴ is a functional groupincluding, but not limited to, hydrogen and alkyl; and X is a functionalgroup including, but not limited to, ═O and ═N—OR⁵, wherein R⁵ is amember selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and alkyl.

As explained above, the compounds of the present invention possesspotent antiprogestational activity with minimal antiglucocorticoidactivity and, thus, they are suitable for long term use in the treatmentof human endocrinologies or other conditions in steroid-sensitivetissues. Specific conditions for treatment include, but are not limitedto, endometriosis (Kettel, L. M., et al., Fertil Steril, 56:402-407;Murphy, A. A., et al., Fertil Steril, 6:3761-766; Grow, D. R., et al.,J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 81:1933-1939.) uterine leiomyoma (Murphy,A. A., et al., Ibid.; Murphy, A. A., et al., J. Clin. Endocrinol.Metab., 76:513-517), uterine fibroid (Brogden, R. N., et al., Drugs,45:384:409), meningioma (Brogden, R. N., et al., Ibid.; Poisson, M., etal., J. Neurooncol., 1:179-189; Carroll, R. S., et al., Cancer Res.,53:1312-1316; Mahajan, D. K. and London, S. N., Fertil Steril,68:967-976 (1997)), and metastatic breast cancer (Brogden, R. N., etal., Id.; Rochefort, H., Trends in Pharmacol. Sci., 8:126-128; Horwitz,K. B., Endocr. Rev., 13:146-163 (1992) Mahajan, D. K. and London. S. N.,Id.). Other uses include, but are not limited to, contraception (Wood,A. J. J., N. engl. J. Med., 329:404-412 (1993); Ulmann, A., et al., Sci.Amer., 262:42-48 (1990)), emergency postcoital contraceptive (Reel, J.R., et al., Contraception, 58:129-136 (1998)) and inducement of cervicalripening.

As such, in addition to providing compounds of Formula I, the presentinvention provides methods wherein the compounds of Formula I areadvantageously used, inter alia, to antagonize endogenous progesterone;to induce menses; to treat endometriosis; to treat dysmenorrhea; totreat endocrine hormone-dependent tumors (e.g., breast cancer, uterineleiomyomas, etc.); to treat meningiomas; to treat uterine fibroids; toinhibit uterine endometrial proliferation; to induce cervical ripening;to induce labor; and for contraception.

Other features, objects and advantages of the invention and itspreferred embodiments will become apparent from the detailed descriptionwhich follows.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1 through 11 illustrate the synthetic schemes used to prepare thecompounds of Formula I.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION AND PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In one aspect, the present invention provides compounds having thefollowing general formula:

In Formula I, R¹ is a functional group including, but not limited to,—OCH₃, —SCH₃, —N(CH₃)₂, —NHCH₃, —NC₄H₈, —NC₅H₁₀, —NC₄HO, —CHO,—CH(OH)CH₃, —C(O)CH₃, —O(CH₂)₂N(CH₃)₂, —O(CH₂)₂NC₄H₈, and—O(CH₂)₂NC₅H₁₀. R² is a functional group including, but not limited to,hydrogen, halogen, alkyl, acyl, hydroxy, alkoxy (e.g., methoxy, ethoxy,vinyloxy, ethynyloxy, cyclopropyloxy, etc.), acyloxy (e.g., formyloxy,acetoxy, priopionyloxy, heptanoyloxy, glycinate, etc.), alkylcarbonate,cypionyloxy, S-alkyl, —SCN, S-acyl and —OC(O)R⁶, wherein R⁶ is afunctional group including, but not limited to, alkyl (e.g., methyl,ethyl, etc.), alkoxyalkyl (e.g., —CH₂OCH₃) and alkoxy (—OCH₃). R³ is afunctional group including, but not limited to, alkyl, hydroxy, alkoxyand acyloxy. R⁴ is a functional group including, but not limited to,hydrogen and alkyl. Finally, X is a functional group including, but notlimited to, ═O and ═N—OR⁵, wherein R⁵ is a member selected from thegroup consisting of hydrogen and alkyl. In a preferred embodiment, R¹,R², R³, R⁴ and X are selected with the proviso that if R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂,R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl and X is ═O, then R² is not hydrogen.

The term “alkyl” is used herein to refer to a branched or unbranched,saturated or unsaturated, monovalent hydrocarbon radical having from1-12 carbons and, preferably, from 1-6 carbons. When the alkyl group hasfrom 1-6 carbon atoms, it is referred to as a “lower alkyl.” Suitablealkyl radicals include, for example, methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, i-propyl,2-propenyl (or allyl), n-butyl, t-butyl, i-butyl (or 2-methylpropyl),etc. As used herein, the term alkyl encompasses “substituted alkyls.”Substituted alkyl refers to alkyl as just described including one ormore functional groups such as lower alkyl, aryl, aralkyl, acyl, halogen(i.e., alkylhalos, e.g., CF₃), hydroxy (e.g., hydroxymethyl), amino,alkylamino, acylamino, acyloxy, alkoxy (e.g., methoxymethyl), mercaptoand the like. These groups may be attached to any carbon atom of thelower alkyl moiety.

The term “alkoxy” is used herein to refer to the —OR group, where R is alower alkyl, substituted lower alkyl, aryl, substituted aryl, aralkyl orsubstituted aralkyl. Suitable alkoxy radicals include, for example,methoxy, ethoxy, phenoxy, t-butoxy (e.g., methoxyethoxy, methoxymethoxy,etc.), etc.

The term “acyloxy” is used herein to refer to an organic radical derivedfrom an organic acid by the removal of a hydrogen. The organic radicalcan be further substituted with one or more functional groups such asalkyl, aryl, aralkyl, acyl, halogen, amino, thiol, hydroxy, alkoxy, etc.An example of such a substituted organic radical is glycinate (e.g.,—OC(O)CH₂NH₂). Suitable acyloxy groups include, for example, acetoxy,i.e., CH₃COO—, which is derived from acetic acid, formyloxy, i.e.,H.CO.O—, which is derived from formic acid and cypionyloxy, which isderived from 3-cyclopentylpropionic acid.

The term “halogen” is used herein to refer to fluorine, bromine,chlorine and iodine atoms.

The term “hydroxy” is used herein to refer to the group —OH.

The term “acyl” denotes groups —C(O)R, where R is alkyl or substitutedalkyl, aryl or substituted aryl as defined herein.

The term “aryl” is used herein to refer to an aromatic substituent whichmay be a single ring or multiple rings which are fused together, linkedcovalently, or linked to a common group such as an ethylene or methylenemoiety. The aromatic ring(s) may include phenyl, naphthyl, biphenyl,diphenylmethyl, 2,2-diphenyl-1-ethyl, and may contain a heteroatom, suchas thienyl, pyridyl and quinoxalyl. The aryl group may also besubstituted with halogen atoms, or other groups such as nitro, carboxyl,alkoxy, phenoxy, and the like. Additionally, the aryl group may beattached to other moieties at any position on the aryl radical whichwould otherwise be occupied by a hydrogen atom (such as 2-pyridyl,3-pyridyl and 4-pyridyl).

The term “alkyl carbonate” is used herein to refer to the group—OC(O)OR, where R is alkyl, substituted alkyl, aryl, or substituted arylas defined herein.

The term “S-alkyl” is used herein to refer to the group —SR, where R islower alkyl or substituted lower alkyl.

The term “S-acyl” is used herein to refer to a thioester derived fromthe reaction of a thiol group with an acylating agent. Suitable S-acylsinclude, for example, S-acetyl, S-propionyl and S-pivaloyl. Those ofskill in the art will know that S-acyl refers to such thioestersregardless of their method of preparation.

The terms “N-oxime” and “N-alkyloxime” are used herein to refer to thegroup ═N—OR⁵, wherein R⁵ is, for example, hydrogen (N-oxime) or alkyl(N-alkyloxime). Those of skill in the art will know that the oximes canconsist of the syn-isomer, the anti-isomer or a mixture of both the syn-and anti-isomers.

Within Formula I, certain embodiments are preferred, namely those inwhich R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; those in which R² is halogen or alkoxy; those inwhich R³ is acyloxy; those in which R⁴ is alkyl (e.g., methyl andethyl); and those is which X is ═O and ═N—OR⁵, wherein R⁵ is hydrogen oralkyl. More particularly, compounds which are preferred are those inwhich R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is halogen; R³ is acyloxy; and R⁴ is alkyl.Within this embodiment, compounds which are particularly preferred arethose in which R² is F, Br or Cl; and R⁴ is methyl. Also preferred arecompounds in which R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is alkyl; R³ is acyloxy; R⁴ isalkyl; and X is ═O. Also preferred are compounds in which R¹ is—N(CH₃)₂; R² is alkoxy; R³ is acyloxy; R⁴ is alkyl; and X is ═O. Withinthis embodiment, compounds which are particularly preferred are those inwhich R² is methoxy or ethoxy; and R³ is acetoxy or methoxy. Alsopreferred are compounds in which R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is hydroxy; R³ isacyloxy; R⁴ is alkyl; and X is ═O. Also preferred are compounds in whichR¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² and R³ are both acyloxy; R⁴ is alkyl; and X is ═O.Within this embodiment, compounds which are particularly preferred arethose in which R² and R³ are both acetoxy. Also preferred are compoundsin which R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is S-acyl; R³ is hydroxy or acyloxy; R⁴ isalkyl; and X is ═O. Also preferred are compounds in which R¹ is—N(CH₃)₂; R² is cypionyloxy; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is alkyl; and X is ═O.Also preferred are compounds in which R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is methoxy; R³is acetoxy; R⁴ is alkyl; and X is =0 and ═N—OR⁵, wherein R⁵ is, forexample, hydrogen or alkyl (e.g., methyl, ethyl, etc.). Also preferredare compounds in which R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² and R³ are both acetoxy; R⁴ isalkyl; and X is ═O and ═N—OR⁵, wherein R⁵ is, for example, hydrogen oralkyl (e.g., methyl, ethyl, etc.).

Exemplar compounds falling within the above preferred embodimentsinclude, but are not limited to, 17α-acetoxy-21-fluoro-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione,17α-acetoxy-21-chloro-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione,17α-acetoxy-21-bromoro-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione,17-,21-diacetoxy-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione,17α-hydroxy-21-acetylthio-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione,17α-acetoxy-21-acetylthio-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione,17α-acetoxy-21-ethoxy-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione,17α-acetoxy-21-methyl-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylamino-phenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione,17α-acetoxy-21-methoxy-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione,17α-acetoxy-21-ethoxy-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione,17α-acetoxy-21-(3′-cyclopentylpropionyloxy)-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione,17α-acetoxy-21-hydroxy-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione,17α,21-diacetoxy-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione3-oxime,17α-acetoxy-21-methoxy-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione3-oxime,17α-acetoxy-11β-[4-(N-methylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9diene-3,20-dione,and17α,21-diacetoxy-11β-[4-(N-methylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione.

In addition to the foregoing, certain other embodiments are preferred,namely those in which R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂, —NC₄H₈, —NC₅H₁₀, —NC₄HsO,—C(O)CH₃, —O(CH₂)₂N(CH₃)₂, —O(CH₂)₂NC₄Hs, —O(CH₂)₂NC₅H₁₀, and—O(CH₂)₂NC₅H₁₀; those in which R² is hydrogen, alkyloxy, alkoxy, —SAc,—SCN, —OC(O)CH₂N(CH₃)₂, and —OC(O)R⁶, wherein R⁶ is a functional groupincluding, but not limited to, alkyls (e.g., —CH₂CH₃), alkoxy esters(e.g., —CH₂OMe) and alkoxys (e.g., —OCH₃); those in which R³ is alkyl,alkoxy, acyloxy and hydroxy; those in which R⁴ is alkyl (e.g., methyland ethyl); and those is which X is ═O or ═N—OR⁵, wherein R⁵ is hydrogenor alkyl. Also preferred are compounds in which R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² ishydrogen; R³ is methoxymethyl; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O. Also preferredare compounds in which R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is hydrogen; R³ is —OC(O)H,—OC(O)CH₂CH₃ or —OC(O)C₆H₁₃; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O. Also preferredare compounds in which R¹ is —NC₄H₈, —NC₅H₁₀, —NC₄H₈O, —C(O)CH₃ or—SCH₃; R² is hydrogen; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O. Alsopreferred are compounds in which R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂ or —NC₅H₁₀; R² ishydrogen; R³ is methoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O. Also preferred arecompounds in which R¹ is —NC₅H₁₀ or —C(O)CH₃; R² and R³ are bothacetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O. Also preferred are compounds inwhich R¹ is —C(O)CH₃; R² is —SAc; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is═O. Also preferred are compounds in which R¹ is —C(O)CH₃, —N(CH₃)₂,—NC₄H₈ or —NC₅H₁₀; R² and R³ are both methoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is═O. Also preferred are compounds in which R¹ is —NC₅H₁₀, —C(O)CH₃ or—O(CH₂)₂N(CH₃)₂; R² is methoxy; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is═O. Also preferred are compounds in which R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is—OC(O)CH₂CH₃, —OC(O)OCH₃, —OC(O)OCH₂OCH₃, —OCH═CH₂, —OC(O)CH₂N(CH₃)₂ or—SCN; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O. Also preferred arecompounds in which R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is —OC(O)H; R³ is —OC(O)H; R⁴ ismethyl; and X is ═O. Also preferred are compounds in which R¹ is—N(CH₃)₂; R² is —OC(O)H; R³ is hydroxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O. Alsopreferred are compounds in which R¹ is —NC₅H₁₀; R² is hydrogen; R³ isacetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═N—OR⁵, wherein R⁵ is hydrogen. Alsopreferred are compounds in which R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂ or —NC₅H₁₀; R² ishydrogen or methoxy; R³ is methoxy or ethoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is═N—OR⁵, wherein R⁵ is hydrogen.

Exemplar compounds falling within the above preferred embodimentsinclude, but are not limited to,17α-formyloxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-propionoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-heptanoyloxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-methoxymethyl-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-acetoxy-11β-(4-N-pyrrolidinophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-acetoxy-11β-(4-N-piperidinophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-acetoxy-11β-(4-N-morpholinophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-acetoxy-11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-acetoxy-11β-(4-methylthiophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-methoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-methoxy-11β-(4-N-piperidinophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α,21-diacetoxy-11β-(4-N-piperidinophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α,21-diacetoxy-11β-(4-acetylphenyl)19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-acetoxy-11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-21-thioacetoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α,21-dimethoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α,21-dimethoxy-11β-(4-N-pyrrolidinophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α,21-dimethoxy-11β-(4-N-piperidinophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α,21-dimethoxy-11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-acetoxy-11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-acetoxy-11β-{4-[2′-(N,N-dimethylamino)ethoxy]phenyl}-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α,21-diformyloxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-acetoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-propionyloxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-acetoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-(2′-methoxyacetyl)oxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-acetoxy-21-hydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione-21-methylcarbonate;17α-acetoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-(1′-ethenyloxy)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-acetoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-(2′-N,N-dimethylamino)acetoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-acetoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-thiocyanato-9-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione;17α-acetoxy-11β-(4-N-piperidinophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione3-oxime;17α-methoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione3-oxime;17α-methoxy-11β-(4-N-piperidinophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione3-oxime; and17α,21-dimetnoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione3-oxime.

The compounds of the present invention can readily be synthesized in avariety of ways using modern synthetic organic chemistry techniques.Typically, the compounds of the present invention are prepared using thesynthetic schemes set forth in FIGS. 1-11. In general, there are fivestrategic steps that are useful in the synthesis of theantiprogestational agents of the present invention. They are: (1)C21-substitution; (2) construction of the 17α-hydroxy-20-ketone pregnaneside chain with the natural configuration via the SNAP reaction; (3)modification of the 17α-hydroxy moiety; (4) regiospecific synthesis ofthe epoxide and 1,4-conjugate grignard addition of a variety of4-substituted aryl compounds; and (5) deketalization at C3 and 20 andconcomitant dehydratration at C5. Each of these five strategic steps isdescribed in greater detail hereinbelow. Moreover, a more detaileddescription of the synthetic protocols used to prepare the compounds ofthe present invention is set forth in the Example Section. It will bereadily apparent to those of skill in the art that the particular steps,or combination of steps, used will vary depending on the compound beingsynthesized.

1. 21-Substitution

In particular embodiments of the present invention, a number ofdifferent functional groups, such as F, Cl, Br, Me, hydroxy, alkoxy(e.g., methoxy, ethoxy, etc.), acyloxy (i.e., formyloxy, acetoxy,propionyloxy, etc.), cypionyloxy, methoxyacetoxy, and acylthio, havebeen introduced at C-21 of lead compound17α-acetoxy-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(CDB-2914 or C-21H or 69) using the synthetic schemes set forth in FIGS.1, 2 and 3. For instance, a Silicon Nucleophilic Annulation Process(SNAP) on 17β-cyanohydrin (5) was used to prepare all of the21-halogenated compounds with the exception of the 21-fluoro compound.This compound, however, was readily obtained by reacting the 21-mesylatewith KF in acetonitrile in the presence of a crown ether. In addition,the 17α-acetoxy-21-ol compound (41) was obtained selectively from theethoxyethylidenedioxy derivative (18) by means of buffered hydrolysis,whereas the 17α-ol-21-acetate derivative (8) was prepared from reactingthe 21-halo compound with KOAc. It is interesting to note that both the21-acetate and the 17α-acetate produced the 17α,21-diol (2) by a basecatalyzed methanolosis. Thereafter, this 17α,21-diol was readilyconverted to the 17α,21-diacetate (15) by a mixed anhydride procedure.With regard to the synthesis of 17α-acetoxy-21-cypionate (40), thehydroxyl group at C-21 of the 17α,21-diol (9) was first converted to thecorresponding cypionate (39) and then the 17α-OH group was acetylated.The 17α-acetoxy-21-thioacetate (17) was obtained by reaction of the21-iodo compound generated in situ from the corresponding bromo compound(7B), with potassium thioacetate followed by acetylation of the17α-alcohol as shown in the synthetic scheme set forth in FIG. 1.

Moreover, the 21-methyl analog (28) was prepared following the syntheticroute set forth in FIG. 2. The key reactions in this scheme are (1) theconversion of the 17α-cyanohydrin to the 17α-trimethylsilyloxy,17α-aldehyde, and (2) the creation of the 21-methylprogesterone skeleton(21→22).

In addition, the 21-methoxy analog (38) was obtained following thesynthetic scheme set forth in FIG. 3. The key step in this scheme is thereaction of the 17α,21-diol protected at C-3 and C-20 with Meerwein'strimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate salt in the presence of thesterically more hindered, less nucleophilic base,1,8-bis(dimethylamino)naphthalene, as the proton sponge to selectivelymethylate the less-hindered 21-hydroxyl group. The subsequentepoxidation of the crude 21-methoxy compound (34) produced a 2:1 mixtureof α and β epoxides as evidenced by ¹H NMR. The crude epoxide (35) wassubjected directly to the copper (I) catalyzed conjugate Grignardaddition, assuming 66% of the crude epoxide was the desired -epoxide,hydrolysis and acetylation gave the 21-methoxy compound (38) with apurity of 98%. Following similar procedures, the 21-ethoxy compound (46)was obtained using triethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate salt. Treatment ofthe 21-acetete (15) and 21-methoxy compound (38) with hydroxylamine HClfollowed by adjustment of the pH to pH 7 provided the desired 3-oximes,47 and 48, respectively, as a mixture of syn- and anti-isomers. Underthese conditions, the sterically hindered C-20 ketone was intact asevidenced by IR spectroscopy.

In addition, using methods similar to those described above, additionalfunctional groups, such as propionyloxy- (126a), 2-methoxyacetoxy-(126b), methylcarbonate (126c), 2-(N,N-dimethylamino)acetoxy- (133), andthiocyanato- (138) were readily synthesized (see, e.g., FIGS. 10 and11). Their synthetic methodology is straightforward. All of thesecompounds were derived from the previously prepared17α,21-dihydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(9 in FIG. 1 or 124 in FIG. 11). The C21-(1-ethenyl)oxy analog (129) wasobtained from the C17α-acetoxy-21-ol (128) by reaction with ethyl vinylether in the presence of mercury(II) trifluoroacetate. Compound 128 was,in turn, obtained from hydrolysis of the 17α,21-cyclic ortho ester (18in FIG. 1 or 127 in FIG. 11). Reaction of the C17α,21-diol (9 in FIG. 1or 124 in FIG. 11) with methyl chloroformate in pyridine gave the methylcarbonate at C21 (125c). Subsequent acetylation at C17 led to the targetcompound 126c (see, FIG. 11). Treatment of the C17α,21-diol (9 or 124)with methoxyacetyl chloride, followed by acetylation, provided 126b(see, FIG. 11). The synthesis of the 21-thiocyanato analog (128), whichis illustrated in FIG. 11, involved the preparation of the 21-mesylate(136), followed by thiocyanation at C21 (137) using the modifiedprocedure of Abramson, H. N., et al. (J. Pharm. Sci. 65:765-768 (1976)).Subsequent acetylation at C17 led to the target compound (138). The21-(N,N-dimethylamino)acetoxy (133) analog was obtained by preparing the21-chloroacetate (130), acetylation of the 17α-OH (131) and convertingthe latter to the 21-iodoacetate (132) followed by the reaction of 132with dimethylamine (see, FIG. 10). This order of sequence did not resultin hydrolysis of the 21-ester group. It is pointed out that an attemptto prepare the 21-iodoacetate (132) directly from the diol (124) was notas successful.

The 17α,21-diformate (139), which is illustrated in FIG. 10, wassynthesized by perchloric acid catalyzed formylation of the 17α,21-diol(124 following the procedure of Oliveto, E. P., et al. (J. Am. Chem.Soc., 77:3564-3567 (1955)). NMR analysis of this material indicated a55:45 mixture of the 17α,21-diformate (139) resonating at 8.029 (s,C17-OCHO) and 8.165 ppm (s, C21-OCHO), respectively, and the21-monoformate (140) at 8.172 ppm (s, C21-OCHO). Therefore,chromatographic separation was essential to obtain the pure17α,21-diformate (139).

Syntheses of the 17α,21-dimethoxy derivatives (113a, 113b, 133c and133d) were achieved via oxidation at C-21 to afford the 21-hydroxyderivative (107) of the 17-methoxy compound (94) following amodification of the procedure reported by Moriarty, R. M. et al., J.Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 641-642 (1981), and Velerio, et al., Steroids,60:268-271 (1995). Subsequent O-methylation provided the key17α,21-dimethoxy intermediate 108) (see, FIG. 8). Reduction of the20-ketone (108) to the 20ξ-ol (109) followed by epoxidation at C5 andC10, copper (I) catalyzed conjugate Grignard addition to the5α,10α-epoxide (110), selective oxidation of the secondary alcohol,20ξ-ol (111) using IBX to the 20-ketone (112), hydrolysis andacetylation, led to the target 17α,21-dimethoxy derivatives (113).

2. Silicon Nucleophilic Annelation Process (SNAP)

As described herein silylation of β-cyanohydrin ketal withhalomethyldimethylsilyl chloride afforded the chloro- orbromomethyldimethylsilyl ether. The reductive SNAP reaction provided the17α-hydroxy-20-ketopregnane side chain with the natural configuration atC17 (Livingston, D. A., et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112:6449-6450 (1990);Livingston, D. A., Adv. Med. Chem., 1:137-174 (1992); U.S. Pat. No.4,092,693, which issued to Livingston, D. A., et al. (May 1, 1990); U.S.Pat. No. 4,977,255, which issued to Livingston, D. A., et al. (Dec. 11,1990). Alternatively, the formation of the halomethyldimethylsilylether, followed by treatment with lithium diisopropyl amide, providedthe 21-substituted -17α-hydroxy-20-ketopregnanes.

3. 17α-Substitution

All 17α-esters illustrated in FIGS. 4-11 were prepared from their17α-hydroxy precursors. With the exception of the 17α-formate (69A) andthe 17α,21-diformate (139), all 17α-esters were also obtained via amixed anhydride procedure (Carruthers, N. I. et al., J. Org. Chem.,57:961-965 (1992)).

17α-methoxy steroid (93) became available in large quantities from the17α-hydroxydienedione (92) leading to a new series of antiprogestationalagents, such as compounds 97 and 113. Methylation of 17α-hydroxy groupwas most efficiently carried out using methyl iodide and silver oxidewith acetonitrile as a cosolvent as described in the general procedureof Finch, et al. (J. Org. Chem., 40:206-215 (1975)). Other syntheses of17α-methoxy steroids have been reported in the literature (see, e.g.,Numazawa, M. and Nagaoka, M., J. Chem. Soc. Commun., 127-128 (1983);Numazawa, M. and Nagaoka, M., J. Org. Chem., 50:81-84 (1985); Glazier,E. R., J. Org. Chem., 27:4397-4393 (1962).

The 17α-methoxymethyl compound (91) was obtained in 0.7% overall yieldvia the 14-step sequence illustrated in FIG. 5 starting from estronemethyl ether (77). No attempts were made to optimize the yield. Thegeneral strategy involved: (1) Construction of the 20-ketopregnane sidechain; (2) Formation of the 17,20-enol acetate and subsequent alkylationwith bromomethyl methyl ether; (3) Elaboration of the3-ketal-5(10),9(11)-diene; (4) Epoxidation; (5) Conjugate Grignardaddition; and (6) Hydrolysis.

4. 11β-Aryl-4-Substitution

The introduction of a variety of 4-substituted phenyl group at C11β into19-norprogesterone requires the 5α,10α-epoxide. Epoxidation of 2, 23,34, 42, 50, 88, 94, 99, 109 and 119 has been known to be problematic(see, Wiechert, R. and Neef, G., J. Steroid Biochem., 27:851-858(1987)). The procedure developed by Teutsch, G., et al. (Adrenal SteroidAntagonism (Agarwal, M. K., ed.), 43-75, Walter de Gruyter & Co.,Berlin, N.Y. (1984)), i.e., H₂O₂ and hexachloro or fluoroacetone, provedto be regioselective, but not highly stereoselective. A mixture of5α,10α-epoxide and the corresponding 513,100-isomer was formed inapproximately a 3:1 ratio. However, reduction of the C20-ketone (108) tothe C20-ol (109) prior to epoxidation, resulted in a 9:1 ratio of thedesired 5α,10α-epoxide.

Treatment of the 5α,10α-epoxides with 3-5 equivalents of Grignardreagents prepared from various 4-substituted aryl bromides (see, Yur'ev,Y. K., et al., Izvest. Akad. Nauk. S. S. S. R., Otdel Khim Nauk, 166-171(CA 45: 10236f, (1951)); Wolfe, J. P. and Buchwald, S. L., J. Org.Chem., 62:6066-6068 (1997); Veradro, G., et al., Synthesis, 447-450(1991); Jones, D. H., J. Chem. Soc. (C), 132-137 (1971); Detty et al.,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 105:875-882 (1983), and Rao, P. N. et al., Steroids,63:523-550 (1998)) in the presence of copper (I) chloride as a catalystprovided the desired 11β-4-substituted phenyl steroids. It is noted that4-bromothioanisole was purchased from the Aldrich Chemical Co.(Milwaukee, Wis.). Evidence of the 11β-orientation of the 4-substitutedphenyl substituent was shown by the upfiled shift of the C18 methylgroup (δ=0.273-0.484 ppm in CDCl₃), which is in agreement with Teutsch'sobservations (see, Teutsch, G. and Belanger, A., Tetrahedron Lett.,2051-2054 (1979)).

The presence of an unprotected 20-ketone resulted in low yields or inundesirable Grignard product mixtures. This was circumvented byreduction of the 20-ketone (analysis of this material by NMR indicated asingle isomer; no further work was done for identification of thissingle isomer) prior to epoxidation and subsequent oxidation of the20-alcohol by use of iodoxybenzoic acid (IBX) (Dess, D. B. and Martin,J. C., J. Org. Chem., 48:4155-4156 (1983); Frigerio, M. andSantagostino, M., Tetrahedron Letters, 35:8019-8022 (1994); andFrigerio, M. et al., J. Org. Chem., 60:7272-7276) after Grignardaddition (see, FIG. 8).

In case of FIGS. 5 and 6, the C3-ketone group was protected as amonoethyleneketal, and the C20-ketone was found to be intact when theGrignard reaction was followed during the multi-step procedures. For thesyntheses of the 17α,21-diacetoxy derivatives (FIG. 7), the strategy wasto accomplish the conjugate addition prior to the SNAP reaction usingthe multi-step process described herein.

5. Deketalization

Deketalization with concomitant dehydration at C-5 in acidic mediaproceeded smoothly to provide the 4,9-diene-3,20-dione.

Quite surprisingly, the compounds of Formula I possess potentantiprogestational activity with minimal antiglucocorticoid activity. Asa result of their antiprogestational activity, the compounds of FormulaI can advantageously be used, inter alia, to antagonize endogenousprogesterone; to induce menses; to treat endometriosis; to treatdysmenorrhea; to treat endocrine hormone-dependent tumors; to treatmeningioma; to treat uterine leiomyonas, to treat uterine fibroids; toinhibit uterine endometrial proliferation; to induce labor; to inducecervical ripening, for hormone therapy; and for contraception.

More particularly, compounds having antiprogestational activity arecharacterized by antagonizing the effects of progesterone. As such, thecompounds of the present invention are of particular value in thecontrol of hormonal irregularities in the menstrual cycle, forcontrolling endometriosis and dysmenorrhea, and for inducing menses. Inaddition, the compounds of the present invention can be used as a methodof providing hormone therapy either alone or in combination withestrogenic substances in postmenopausal women, or in women whose ovarianhormone production is otherwise compromised.

Moreover, the compounds of the present invention can be used for controlof fertility during the whole of the reproductive cycle. For long-termcontraception, the compounds of the present invention can beadministered either continuously or periodically depending on the dose.In addition, the compounds of the present invention are of particularvalue as postcoital contraceptives, for rendering the uterus inimical toimplantation, and as “once a month” contraceptive agents.

A further important utility for the compounds of the present inventionlies in their ability to slow down growth of hormone-dependent tumorsand/or tumors present in hormone-responsive tissues. Such tumorsinclude, but are not limited to, kidney, breast, endometrial, ovarian,and prostate tumors, e.g., cancers, which are characterized bypossessing progesterone receptors and can be expected to respond to thecompounds of this invention. In addition, such tumors includemeningiomas. Other utilities of the compounds of the present inventioninclude the treatment of fibrocystic disease of the breast and uterine.

Compounds suitable for use in the above method of the present inventioncan readily be identified using in vitro and in vivo screening assaysknown to and used by those of skill in the art. For instance, a givencompound can readily be screened for its antiprogestational propertiesusing, for example, the anti-McGinty test and/or the antiClauberg testdescribed in the examples. In addition, a given compound can readily bescreened for its ability to bind to the progesterone and/orglucocorticoid receptors or to inhibit ovulation using the assaysdescribed in the examples. Moreover, a given compound can readily bescreened for its ability to inhibit tumor cell growth (e.g., malignanttumor growth, i.e., cancer) or to abolish tumorigenicity of malignantcells in vitro or in vivo. For instance, tumor cell lines can be exposedto varying concentrations of a compound of interest, and the viabilityof the cells can be measured at set time points using, for example, thealamar Blue® assay (commercially available from BioSource, Internationalof Camarillo, Calif.). Other assays known to and used by those of skillin the art can be employed to identify compounds useful in the methodsof the present invention.

The compounds according to the present invention can be administered toany warm-blooded mammal such as humans, domestic pets, and farm animals.Domestic pets include dogs, cats, etc. Farm animals include cows,horses, pigs, sheep goats, etc.

The amount of active ingredient that can be combined with a carriermaterial to produce a single dosage form will vary depending upon thedisease treated, the mammalian species, and the particular mode ofadministration. For example, a unit dose of the steroid can preferablycontain between 0.1 milligram and 1 gram of the active ingredient. Amore preferred unit dose is between 0.001 and 0.5 grams. It will beunderstood, however, that the specific dose level for any particularpatient will depend on a variety of factors including the activity ofthe specific compound employed; the age, body weight, general health,sex and diet of the individual being treated; the time and route ofadministration; the rate of excretion; other drugs which have previouslybeen administered; and the severity of the particular disease undergoingtherapy, as is well understood by those of skill in the area.

The compounds of the present invention can be administered by a varietyof methods. Thus, those products of the invention that are active by theoral route can be administered in solutions, suspensions, emulsions,tablets, including sublingual and intrabuccal tablets, soft gelatincapsules, including solutions used in soft gelatin capsules, aqueous oroil suspensions, emulsions, pills, lozenges, troches, tablets, syrups orelixirs and the like. Products of the invention active on parenteraladministration can be administered by depot injection, implantsincluding Silastic™ and biodegradable implants, intramuscular andintravenous injections.

Compositions can be prepared according to any method known to the artfor the manufacture of pharmaceutical compositions and such compositionscan contain one or more agents selected from the group consisting ofsweetening agents, flavoring agents, coloring agents and preservingagents. Tablets containing the active ingredient in admixture withnontoxic pharmaceutically acceptable excipients which are suitable formanufacture of tablets are acceptable. These excipients can be, forexample, inert diluents, such as calcium carbonate, sodium carbonate,lactose, calcium phosphate or sodium phosphate, granulating anddisintegrating agents, such as maize starch, or alginic acid; bindingagents, such as starch, gelatin or acacia; and lubricating agents, suchas magnesium stearate, stearic acid and talc. Tablets can be uncoatedor, alternatively, they can be coated by known methods to delaydisintegration and adsorption in the gastrointestinal tract and therebyprovide a sustained action over a longer period. For example, a timedelay such as glyceryl monostearate or glyceryl distearate alone or witha wax can be employed.

Formulations for oral use can also be presented as hard gelatin capsuleswherein the active ingredient is mixed with an inert solid diluent, forexample calcium carbonate, calcium phosphate or kaolin, or as softgelatin capsules wherein the active ingredient is mixed with water or anoil medium, such as peanut oil, liquid paraffin or olive oil.

Aqueous suspensions of the invention contain the active materials inadmixture with excipients suitable for the manufacture of aqueoussuspensions. Such excipients include a suspending agent, such as sodiumcarboxymethylcellulose, methylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose,sodium alginate, polyvinylpyrrolidone, gum tragacanth and gum acacia,and dispersing or wetting agents such as a naturally occurringphosphatide (e.g., lecithin), a condensation product of an alkyleneoxide with a fatty acid (e.g., polyoxyethylene stearate), a condensationproduct of ethylene oxide with a long chain aliphatic alcohol (e.g.,heptadecaethylene oxycetanol), a condensation product of ethylene oxidewith a partial ester derived from a fatty acid and a hexitol (e.g.,polyoxyethylene sorbitol mono-oleate), or a condensation product ofethylene oxide with a partial ester derived from fatty acid and ahexitol anhydride (e.g., polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate). Theaqueous suspension can also contain one or more preservatives such asethyl or n-propyl p-hydroxybenzoate, one or more coloring agents, one ormore flavoring agents and one or more sweetening agents, such assucrose, aspartame or saccharin. Ophthalmic formulations, as is known inthe art, will be adjusted for osmolarity.

Oil suspensions can be formulated by suspending the active ingredient ina vegetable oil, such as arachis oil, olive oil, sesame oil or coconutoil, or in a mineral oil such as liquid paraffin. The oil suspensionscan contain a thickening agent, such as beeswax, hard paraffin or cetylalcohol. Sweetening agents can be added to provide a palatable oralpreparation. These compositions can be preserved by the addition of anantioxidant such as ascorbic acid.

Dispersible powders and granules of the invention suitable forpreparation of an aqueous suspension by the addition of water can beformulated from the active ingredients in admixture with a dispersing,suspending and/or wetting agent, and one or more preservatives. Suitabledispersing or wetting agents and suspending agents are exemplified bythose disclosed above. Additional excipients, for example sweetening,flavoring and coloring agents, can also be present.

The pharmaceutical compositions of the invention can also be in the formof oil-in-water emulsions. The oily phase can be a vegetable oil, suchas olive oil or arachis oil, a mineral oil, such as liquid paraffin, ora mixture of these. Suitable emulsifying agents includenaturally-occurring gums, such as gum acacia and gum tragacanth,naturally occurring phosphatides, such as soybean lecithin, esters orpartial esters derived from fatty acids and hexitol anhydrides, such assorbitan monooleate, and condensation products of these partial esterswith ethylene oxide, such as polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate. Theemulsion can also contain sweetening and flavoring agents.

Syrups and elixirs can be formulated with sweetening agents, such asglycerol, sorbitol or sucrose. Such formulations can also contain ademulcent, a preservative, a flavoring or a coloring agent.

The pharmaceutical compositions of the invention can be in the form of asterile injectable preparation, such as a sterile injectable aqueous oroleaginous suspension. This suspension can be formulated according tothe known art using those suitable dispersing or wetting agents andsuspending agents which have been mentioned above. The sterileinjectable preparation can also be a sterile injectable solution orsuspension in a nontoxic parenterally-acceptable diluent or solvent,such as a solution of 1,3-butanediol. Among the acceptable vehicles andsolvents that can be employed are water and Ringer's solution, anisotonic sodium chloride. In addition, sterile fixed oils canconventionally be employed as a solvent or suspending medium. For thispurpose any bland fixed oil can be employed including synthetic mono- ordiglycerides. In addition, fatty acids such as oleic acid can likewisebe used in the preparation of injectables.

The compounds of this invention can also be administered in the form ofsuppositories for rectal administration of the drug. These compositionscan be prepared by mixing the drug with a suitable non-irritatingexcipient which is solid at ordinary temperatures but liquid at therectal temperatures and will therefore melt in the rectum to release thedrug. Such materials are cocoa butter and polyethylene glycols.

They can also be administered by in intranasal, intraocular,intravaginal, and intrarectal routes including suppositories,insufflation, powders and aerosol formulations.

Products of the invention which are preferably administered by thetopical route can be administered as applicator sticks, solutions,suspensions, emulsions, gels, creams, ointments, pastes, jellies,paints, powders, and aerosols.

The invention will be described in greater detail by way of specificexamples. The following examples are offered for illustrative purposes,and are intended neither to limit or define the invention in any manner.

EXAMPLES Preparation of the Compounds of Formula I Example 1

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-acetoxy-21-fluoro-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(13) via the Silicon Nucleophilic Annulation Process (SNAP) of 5.

Step 1.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-17β-cyano-17α-trimethylsilyloxyestra-5(10),9(11)-diene(2)

Under nitrogen, a solution of the cyanohydrin ketal (1, 15 g, 43.9 mmol)in pyridine (85 mL) was treated with chlorotrimethylsilane (28 mL=27.11g, 221 mmol) and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5hours. The reaction was monitored by Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) in2% acetone in CH₂Cl₂. The reaction mixture was poured into a 50:50mixture of ice/saturated sodium bicarbonate solution (IL), stirred untilthe ice was melted, and extracted with hexanes (3×). The organicextracts were washed with water (2×), brine (1×), combined, dried overNa₂SO₄, and concentrated in vacuo. The remaining pyridine wasazeotropically removed in vacuo with heptane to give 18 g of the crudeproduct as a foam. Crystallization from ether/hexanes gave 16.35 g ofthe pure silyl ether (2) as a white solid in 90% yield; m.p.=100-102° C.FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 2880, 2232 and 1254 cm⁻¹.

NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.11 (s, 9H, OSiMe₃), 0.73 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 3.83 (s, 4H,—OCH₂CH₂O—) and 5.49 (br s, 1H, 1β-H).

Step 2.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α,10α-epoxy-17β-cyano-17α-trimethylsilyloxyestra-9(11)-ene(3)

Hydrogen peroxide (30%, 6 mL, 58.6 mmol) was added to a vigorouslystirred mixture of hexafluoroacetone trihydrate (11.8 g, 53.6 mmol) andNa₂HPO₄ (6.8 g, 47.9 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (150 mL) cooled to 0° C. in an icebath. After stirring at 0° C. for 30 minutes, a solution of the silylether (2, 16 g, 38.7 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (10 mL), pre-cooled to 0° C. wasadded. The mixture was then stirred at 0° C. for 8 hr. At that time TLCin 5% acetone/CH₂Cl₂ indicated incomplete reaction and the mixture wasthen stirred overnight at 4° C. The reaction mixture was diluted withCH₂Cl₂ (200 mL) and washed with 10% sodium sulfite solution (2×),saturated sodium bicarbonate solution (1×) and brine (1×). The organiclayers were combined, dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered and concentrated invacuo to give 16.8 g of the crude epoxide mixture which consists of a70:30 mixture of the 5α,10α-epoxide and 5β,10β-epoxide. Crystallizationof the crude mixture from ether/hexanes afforded 8.5 g of the pure5α,10α-epoxide (3) as a white solid in 51% yield; m.p.=164-165° C. FTIR(KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 2940, 2872, 2228 and 1252 cm⁻¹. NMR(CDCl₃) δ 0.23 (s, 9H, OSiMe₃), 0.91 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 3.91 (s, 4H,OCH₂CH₂O) and 6.12 (br s, 1H, C11-CH═).

Step 3.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α-hydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-17β-cyano-17α-trimethylsilyloxyestr-9(10)-ene(4)

Magnesium (2.6 g, 107 mmol) was added to a 1.0 L, 3-neck flask equippedwith a magnetic stir bar, addition funnel and a condenser. A crystal ofiodine was added followed by dry THF (100 mL) and a few drops of1,2-dibromoethane. The mixture was stirred under nitrogen and heated ina warm water bath until evidence of reaction was observed. A solution of4-bromo-N,N-dimethylaniline (19.6 g, 98 mmol) in dry THF (100 mL) wasthen added dropwise over a period of 20 min. and the mixture stirred foran additional 1.5 hours. Solid copper (I) chloride (1 g, 10.1 mmol) wasadded followed 30 minutes later by a solution of the 5α-,10α-epoxide (3,8.4 g, 19.55 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL). The mixture was stirred at roomtemperature for 1 hr., then quenched by the addition of saturated NH₄Clsolution (100 mL). With vigorous stirring, air was drawn through thereaction mixture for 30 minutes. The mixture was diluted with ether (250mL) and the layers allowed to separate. The THF/ether solution waswashed with 10% NH₄Cl solution (3×), 2 N NH₄OH solution (3×) and brine(1×). The organic layers were combined, dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered andconcentrated in vacuo to give the crude product. Crystallization of thecrude product from ether gave 8.6 g of the pure product 4 as a whitesolid in 80% yield; m.p.=222-224° C. dec. FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance) ν_(max) 3221, 2951, 2232, 1613, 1517 and 1253 cm⁻¹. NMR(CDCl₃) δ 0.20 (s, 9H, OSiMe₃), 0.5 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.83 (s, 6H,NMe₂), 3.9 (m, 4H, OCH₂CH₂O), 4.3 (m, 1H, C11α-CH), 6.63 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H,3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.03 (d, J=9 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's).

Step 4.11β-[4-(N,N-Dimethylamino)phenyl]-17β-cyano-17α-hydroxyestra-4,9-dien-3-one(5)

A solution of the Grignard adduct (4, 8.5 g, 15.4 mmol) was dissolved inTHF (50 mL) and the system was flushed with nitrogen. Glacial aceticacid (150 mL) and water (50 mL) were added and the mixture was heated at50° C. for 4 hrs. The volatile substances were removed in vacuo under astream of nitrogen and the residual acid neutralized with NH₄OH. Themixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions werewashed with water (2×), brine (1×), combined, dried over Na₂SO₄,filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Crystallization of the residue fromether gave 3.1 g of cyanohydrin (5) as a pale yellow solid.Chromatography of the mother liquors eluting with 50% EtOAc in hexanesfollowed by crystallization gave 1.8 g of an additional product. Totalyield of the cyanohydrin 5, was 4.9 g in 76.2% yield; m.p.=152-154° C.FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3384, 2950, 2231, 1646, 1606 and1520 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.67 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.97 (s, 6H, NMe₂), 4.38(br s, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.83 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.7 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 7.1 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's).

Step 5.11β-[4-(N,N-Dimethylamino)phenyl]-17β-cyano-17α-bromomethyldimethylsilyloxyestra-4,9-dien-3-one(6)

Under nitrogen, a solution of cyanohydrin (5) (4.8 g, 11.52 mmol),triethylamine (2.5 mL, 17.8 mmol) and dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) (0.4g, 3.3 mmol) in dry THF (50 mL) was treated withbromomethyldimethylsilyl chloride (2 mL, 14.66 mmol). The mixture wasstirred overnight at room temperature, diluted with hexanes, filteredthrough Celite and concentrated in vacuo. Flash chromatography of theresidue using 40% EtOAc in hexanes gave 4.8 g of the pure silyl ether(6) as a white solid in 73.4% yield; m.p.=176-177° C. FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance) ν_(max) 2950, 2882, 2229, 1660, 1613 and 1519 cm⁻¹. NMR(CDCl₃) δ 0.41 (s, 6H, OSi(CH₃)₂), 0.6 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.61 (s, 2H,—SiCH₂Br), 2.91 (s, 6H, NMe₂), 4.4 (br m, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.77 (s, 1H,C4-CH═), 6.66 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.05 (d, J=9 Hz,2′,6′ aromatic-CH's).

Step 6A.17α-Hydroxy-21-chloro-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(7A)

Under anhydrous conditions and using a mechanical stirrer, a solution ofthe silyl ether (4 (370 mg, 0.71 mmol) in dry THF (7.0 mL) was cooled to−78° C. and treated dropwise with a 1.5 M solution of lithiumdiisopropylamide in cyclohexane (1.2 mL, 1.77 mmol). The reactionmixture was stirred at −78° C. for 45 min. and then warmed to −40° C.The reaction was quenched by addition of 4 N HCl (10 mL) and allowed towarm to room temperature. The excess acid was neutralized with thecautious addition of saturated NaHCO₃ solution. The mixture wasextracted with EtOAc. The organic extracts were washed with H₂O, andbrine, combined, and dried over Na₂SO₄. Evaporation of the solvent gave378 mg of the crude product. The material was chromatographed elutingwith 7.5% acetone/CH₂Cl₂ to afford 179 mg of the 21-chloro ketone (7 asa stable foam in 54% yield. MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity) 467 (M⁺,70), 431 (M⁺−36, 8), 134 (18) and 121 (100) FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance) ν_(max) 3363, 2940, 1727, 1641 and 1517 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ0.37 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.90 (s, 6H, NMe₂), 4.40 (br. d, 1H, C11α-CH),4.5 (dd, 2H, J=15 Hz, J′=12 Hz, C21-CH₂Cl), 5.77 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.67and 7.0 (d, 4H, aromatic-CH's).

Generation of (7A) from (5): “One Pot” (Step 5 and 6)Chloromethyldimethyl-silylation/LDA Reaction

A solution of cyanohydrin (5) (2.25 g, 5.4 mmol), TEA (1.02 mL, 7.29mmol) and DMAP (165 mg, 1.35 mmol) in THF (20 mL) was treated withchloromethyl dimethylsilylchloride (0.82 mL, 6.21 mmol). The reactionwas stirred overnight and diluted with THF (30 mL). The mixture waschilled to −78° C. and treated dropwise with LDA (1.5 M/C₆H₂, 14.4 mL).The mixture was stirred at −78° C. for 45 min. and then warmed to −40°C. The reaction was quenched by addition of 4N HCl and allowed to warmto room temperature. The excess acid was neutralized with saturatedNaHCO₃ solution and diluted with water. The aqueous mixture wasextracted with methylene chloride. The organic extracts were washed withH₂O, brine, combined and dried over Na₂SO₄. Evaporation of the solventgave 3.24 g of the residue. The material was chromatographed elutingwith 7.5% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) to afford 1.13 g of 7A in 45% yield, which wasidentical in all respects to the 21-chloroketone (7A) obtained from thepreviously described two step procedure.

Step 6B.17α-Hydroxy-21-bromo-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(7B)

Under anhydrous conditions and using a mechanical stirrer, a solution ofthe silyl ether 6 (2.9 g, 5.11 mmol) in dry THF (80 mL) was cooled to−78° C. and treated dropwise with a 1.5 M solution of lithiumdiisopropylamide (LDA) in cyclohexane (10.2 mL, 15.3 mmol). After 1 hr.,the reaction mixture became very viscous, i.e., almost a gel. Thereaction was quenched at −78° C. by addition of 4 N HBr (50 mL, 200mmol) and the mixture allowed to warm to room temperature. The excessacid was neutralized by slow addition of concentrated NH₄OH solution (15mL) and the mixture was poured into water (100 mL) and extracted withCH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic extracts were washed with water (3×), combined,filtered through Na₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo to give 3.1 g of thecrude product as a foam. Purification via Flash chromatography gave a94:6 mixture of the 21-bromo- (7B) and 21-chloro- (7A) derivativeevidenced by a reverse phase HPLC on a NovaPak column eluting withMeOH/H₂O/Et₃N (70:30:0.033) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min at λ=302 nm. MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity): 513 (M⁺ +2, 10), 512 (M⁺, 20), 431 (18)and 121 (100). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3327, 2948, 1723,1660, 1611 and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.3 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.80 (s,6H, NMe₂), 4.3 (br m, 3H, C11α-CH and C21-CH₂Br), 5.65 (s, 1H, C4-CH═),6.55 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 6.9 (d, J=9 Hz, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's). This mixture was used for the subsequent reactionwithout further purification.

Step 7.17α-Hydroxy-21-acetoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(8)

Under nitrogen, a solution of a 94:6 mixture of the 21-halogenatedsteroid (7A and 7B) (1.8 g, 3.5 mmol) and potassium acetate (10 g, 102mmol) in acetone was refluxed for ½ hrs. At the end of that time, TLC(10% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) indicated no presence of starting material. Thereaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, filtered, concentratedin vacuo, diluted with water (200 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×).The organic extracts were washed with water (2×), combined, filteredthrough Na₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo to give 1.6 g of the crudeacetate (8) as a foam in 93% yield. A small portion of the pure acetate(8) was solidified by trituration with ether for characterization. Thissolid did not have a proper melting point and remained a solid whenheated to 300° C. MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 491 (M⁺, 72), 431(6),314 (17) and 121 (100). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max)3326, 2949, 1752, 1733, 1639, 1613, 1588 and 1519 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ0.43 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.27 (s, 3H, OAc), 3.0 (s, 6H, NMe₂), 4.5 (br. d,1H, C11α-CH), 5.25 (dd, J₁=29.7 Hz, J₂=24 Hz, 2H, CH₂ OAc), 5.87 (s, 1H,C4-CH═), 6.77 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.17 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₀H₃₇NO₅.½H₂O: C, 71.97;H, 7.65; N, 2.80. Found: C, 72.16; H, 7.48; N, 2.90.

Step 8.17α,21-Dihydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(9)

A solution of the 21-acetate (8) (1.6 g, 3.25 mmol) in MeOH (100 mL) wasdeoxygenated by bubbling through it a slow stream of nitrogen for 30minutes. A similarly deoxygenated 0.5 M solution of KHCO₃ in deionizedwater (10 mL, 5 mmol) was added and the mixture heated to reflux undernitrogen and monitored by TLC (5% i-PrOH/CH₂Cl₂) which indicated acomplete reaction after 2 hr. The mixture was neutralized with 1M AcOHsolution and the methanol removed in vacuo under a stream of nitrogen.The residue was taken up in CH₂Cl₂ and washed with water (3×). Theorganic layers were combined, dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered andconcentrated in vacuo to give 1.6 g of the residue. This material waspurified by Flash chromatography using 3% i-PrOH/CH₂Cl₂) followed byprecipitation from methanol with water to give 1.1 g of the diol (9) asa yellow amorphous solid in 75% yield; m.p.=softens at 130° C. FTIR(KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3391, 2946, 1712, 1654, 1612 and 1518cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.35 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.91 (s, 6H, NMe₂), 4.5 (m,3H, C11α-CH and CH₂ OH), 5.77 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.67 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H,3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.0 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 2H, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's). MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity): 449 (M⁺, 51), 431(14), 419(9), 389(27),3432 (9) and 121 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₂₈H₃₅NO₄.½H₂O: C, 73.33; H,7.91; N, 3.05. Found: C, 73.52; H, 7.70; N, 3.06.

Step 9.17α-Hydroxy-21-mesyloxy-11β-[4-(N,N-Dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(10)

Under nitrogen, a solution of the diol (9) (0.5 g, 1.11 mmol) andtriethylamine (0.25 mL, 1.8 mmol) in dry pyridine (10 mL) was cooled to0° C. in an ice bath and treated with methanesulfonyl chloride (0.125mL, 1.615 mmol). After stirring at 0° C. for 1 hr., TLC (10%acetone/CH₂Cl₂) of a quenched (EtOAc/H₂O) aliquot indicated completereaction. Cold water (50 mL) was added and the mixture extracted withCH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic layers were washed with water (3×), combined,dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Azeotropic invacuo removal of trace pyridine using heptane gave 0.62 g of theresidue. Purification via Flash chromatography using 10% acetone/CH₂Cl₂followed by trituration with Et₂O gave 0.46 g of the pure 21-mesylate(10) as a yellow solid in 78.4% yield; m.p.=146-149° C. FTIR (KBr,diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3298, 2947, 2738, 1630, 1614, 1518 and 1174cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.39 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.91 (s, 6H, NMe₂), 3.2 (s,3H, OSO₂CH₃), 4.4 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.27 (dd, J₁=27 Hz, J₂=18 Hz, 2H,C21-CH₂OMs), 5.79 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.69 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 7.07 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's).

Step 10.17α-Hydroxy-21-fluoro-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(11) and17-Spirooxetano-3′-oxo-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-dien-3-one(12)

Under nitrogen, a mixture of the 21-mesylate (10) (0.4 g, 0.758 mmol),potassium fluoride (0.5 g, 8.6 mmol) and 18-Crown-6 (0.5 g, 1.9 mmol) inanhydrous CH₃CN (15 mL) was heated to reflux and monitored by TLC (6%acetone/CH₂Cl₂) which indicated consumption of starting material andformation of two major products after 1 hr. The reaction mixture wascooled to room temperature, diluted with water (150 mL) and extractedwith CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic extracts were washed with water (3×),combined, dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Themixture was separated via flash chromatography using 6% acetone/CH₂Cl₂to give 0.158 g of the 21-fluoro compound (11) as a pale yellow solid in46% yield; m.p. 132-135° C.

FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3492-3303, 2948, 1733, 1652,1610 and 1519 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.40 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.90 (s, 6H,NMe₂), 4.4 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.26 (dd, J_(HF)=48.6 Hz, J₁=16.2 Hz,J₂=22 Hz, 2H, CH₂F), 5.77 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.67 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 7.01 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 451 (M⁺,33) and 121 (100). In addition to theaforementioned compound 11, 0.177 g of the oxetan-3′-one (12) wasobtained as an off-white amorphous powder in 54.1% yield; m.p.=softensat 95° C. MS (EI): m/z (relative intensity) 431 (M⁺, 38), 134 (14) and121 (100) FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 2941, 1809, 1663, 1613and 1519 cm⁻¹. Analysis by a reverse phase HPLC on a NovaPak C₁₈ columneluted with CH₃CN/H₂O/Et₃N (50:50:0.033) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min andat λ=302 nm indicated this material to be of 97% purity whose retentiontime (t_(R)) is 13.39 min. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.55 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.91 (s,6H, NMe₂), 4.45 (br d, J=6.7 Hz, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.03 (dd, J₁=17.1 Hz,J₂=15.3 Hz, 2H, C21-CH₂), 5.79 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.69 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H,3′,5′ aromatic-CH's), 7.03 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). Anal.Calcd. for C₂₈H₃₃NO₃: C, 77.93; H, 7.71; N, 3.25. Found: C, 77.80; H,7.62; N, 3.11.

Step 11.17α-Acetoxy-21-fluoro-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(13)

Under nitrogen, trifluoroacetic anhydride (1.75 mL, 12.39 mmol), glacialacetic acid (0.7 mL, 12.14 mmol) and dry CH₂Cl₂ (10 mL) were combinedand stirred at room temperature for ½ hr. The mixture was cooled to 0°C. in an ice bath and toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (0.1 g, 0.53mmol) was added. A solution of the 21-fluoro-17α-alcohol (11) (0.28 g,0.62 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ was then introduced via syringe and the mixturestirred at 0° C. for 6.5 hrs. After that time, TLC (10% acetone/CH₂Cl₂)indicated a complete reaction. The mixture was diluted with water (3×),neutralized with concentrated NH₄OH solution and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3×). The organic extracts were washed with water (3×), combined,filtered through Na₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo to give 0.32 g of thecrude product as a foam. Purification via flash chromatography (5%acetone/CH₂Cl₂) followed by trituration with heptane and pentane gave0.18 g of the pure 21-fluoro-17α-acetate (13) as a white amorphous solidin 58.8% yield; m.p. 169-173°. Analysis by a reverse phase HPLC on aNovaPak C18 column eluted with MeOH/H₂O/Et₃N (70:30:0.033) at a flowrate of 1 mL/min and at λ=302 nm indicated this material to be of 98.9%purity which has a retention time of t_(R)=5.97 min. MS (EI), m/z(relative intensity): 493 (M⁺, 32), 134 (14), 122 (13) and 121 (100).FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 2946, 1739, 1662, 1612 and 1510cm⁻¹.

NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.40 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.10 (s, 3H, OAc), 2.90 (s, 6H,NMe₂), 4.4 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 4.95 (dq, J_(HF)=48 Hz, J₁=16 Hz, J₂=22Hz, 2H, CH₂F), 5.80 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.67 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 7.03 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). Anal.Calcd. for C₃₀H₃₆FNO₄: C, 73.00; H, 7.35; N, 2.84. Found: C, 72.96; H,7.47; N, 2.84.

Example 2

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-acetoxy-21-chloro-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(14A).

A solution of trifluoroacetic anhydride (2.2 mL, 15.56 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(25 mL) was treated with acetic acid (0.89 mL, 15.56 mmol). The mixturewas stirred at room temperature for 30 min. and p-toluenesulfonic acid(137 mg, 0.72 mmol) was added. The mixture was chilled to 0° C. and asolution of 7A (364 mg, 0.78 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (2.0 mL) was added. Themixture was stirred for ½ hrs. and quenched with cautious addition ofsaturated NaHCO₃ solution. The mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂. Theorganic extracts were washed with H₂O and brine, combined and dried overNa₂SO₄. Evaporation of the solvent gave 412 mg of a stable foam. Thematerial was chromatographed eluting with 5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂ to afford210 mg of 14A in 53% yield as an amorphous foam which persistedrecrystallization from a variety of solvents. Analysis by a reversephase HPLC on a NovaPak C₁₈ column, eluted with 30% aq. MeOH with 0.033%TEA at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min at 2=260 nm showed the material to beapproximately 95% pure. Therefore, the material was purified bypreparative HPLC on a Whatman Magnum Partisil 10-ODS-3 column elutedwith aqueous MeOH with 0.033% TEA at a flow rate of 10 mL per minute atλ=325 nm to afford 158 mg of 14A as an amorphous yellow foam in 48%yield. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 2947, 1731, 1660, 1610and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.40 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.13 (s, 3H,C17α-OAc), 2.90 (s, 6H, N(CH₃)₂), 4.23 (dd, J=15 Hz, J′=9 Hz, 2H,C21-CH₂Cl), 4.4 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.72 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.67 and 7.0(d, 4H, aromatic-CH). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 510 (M⁺, 6), 509(M⁺ −1, 16), 134 and 121 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₀H₃₆NO₄Cl: C, 70.64;H, 7.11; N, 2.75. Found: C, 70.46; H, 7.10; N, 2.76.

Example 3

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-acetoxy-21-bromo-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(14B).

Step 1. Purification of 7B

The pure 21-bromo compound (7B) was isolated from a 90:10 mixture of the21-halo product (7B:7A) by means of Waters Prep LC system on a NovaPakC₁₈ column (40×100 mm) eluted with 30% aq. MeOH and 0.03% Et₃N at a flowrate of 35 mL/min and at λ=334 nm. A total amount of 0.75 g of a 90:10mixture (7B:7A) was chromatographed in 10 runs of 75 mg each to give of0.5 g of the pure 21-bromo compound (7B) as a pale yellow solid in 67%yield. This material was >99% pure by analytical HPLC. FTIR (KBr,diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3327, 2948, 1723, 1660, 1611 and 1518 cm⁻¹.NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.3 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.80 (s, 6H, NMe₂), 4.33 (dd, J₁=12Hz, J₂=9 Hz, 2H, C21-CH₂Br), 4.40 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.65 (s, 1H,C4-CH═), 6.55 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's), 6.9 (d, J=9 Hz,2′,6′ aromatic-CH's).

Step 2. Preparation of the Target Compound (14B)

Under nitrogen, a mixture of trifluoroacetic anhydride (1.64 mL, 11.68mmol), glacial acetic acid (0.67 mL, 11.62 mmol) and dry CH₂Cl₂ (10 mL)was stirred at room temperature for 30 min and then cooled to 0° C. inan ice bath. p-Toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (0.1 g, 0.52 mmol) wasadded followed by a solution of the 21-bromo alcohol (7B) (0.3 g, 0.59mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at 00° C.and monitored by TLC (10% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) which indicated a completereaction in 2 hrs. The mixture was diluted with water (10 mL),neutralized with concentrated NH₄OH solution and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3×). The organic extracts were washed with H₂O (3×), combined, filteredthrough Na₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo to give 0.35 g of the residueas a foam. This material was purified by flash chromatography using 5%acetone/CH₂Cl₂ followed by crystallization from Et₂O/hexanes to give0.24 g of the 21-bromo acetate (14B). Analysis by NMR indicated asignificant amount of ether as solvent of crystallization. This materialwas then dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (3 mL) and the solvent blown down to givean oil. Trituration with heptane followed by washing with pentane anddrying in vacuo gave 0.16 g of the pure 21-bromo compound (14B) as awhite crystalline solid in 49% yield: m.p.=141-145° C. MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 555 (M⁺+2, 82), 553 (M⁺, 76), 475(13), 414 (8),372(13), 134 (15) and 121 (100). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max)2933, 1730, 1664, 1613, 1596 and 1519 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.40 (s, 3H,C18-CH₃), 2.13 (s, 3H, OAc), 2.80 (s, 6H, NMe₂), 4.07 (dd, J₁=14 Hz,J₂=7 Hz, 2H, C21-CH₂Br), 4.40 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.83 (s, 1H, C4-CH═),6.67 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's), 7.07 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₀H₃₆BrNO₄.⅕H₂O: C, 64.98; H, 6.54;Br, 14.41; N, 2.53. Found: C, 64.82; H, 6.62; N, 2.27.

Example 4

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α,21-diacetoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(15).

Under nitrogen, a mixture of trifluoroacetic anhydride (4.0 mL, 28.3mmol), glacial acetic acid (1.6 mL, 27.7 mmol) and dry CH₂Cl₂ (10 mL)was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. and then cooled to 00° C. inan ice bath. p-Toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (0.1 g, 0.53 mmol) wasadded followed by a solution of the 17α,21-diol (9, 0.345 g, 0.77 mmol)in dry CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at 00° C. andmonitored by TLC (10% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) which indicated a completereaction in two hrs. The mixture was diluted with H₂O (10 mL),neutralized with concentrated NH₄OH solution and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3×). The organic layers were washed with H₂O (3×), combined, filteredthrough Na₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo to give 0.4 g of the residue asa foam. This material was purified by flash chromatography using 5%acetone/CH₂Cl₂ followed by trituration with heptane and pentane to give0.24 g of the 17α,21-diacetate (15) as a yellow amorphous solid in 58.4%yield: m.p.=128-134° C. Analysis by a reverse phase HPLC on a NovaPakC₁₈ column eluted with CH₃CN:H₂O:Et₃N (1:1:0.033) at a flow rate of 1mL/min and at λ=302 nm indicated 15 to be of >98% purity which has aretention time of 12 min. MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 533 (M⁺,24), 134 (14), 122 (11) and 121 (100). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance)ν_(max) 2942, 1738.1663, 1611, 1518 and 1233 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.33(s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.10 (s, 3H, C17α-OAc), 2.13 (s, 3H, C21-OAc), 2.90(s, 6H, NMe₂), 4.43 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 4.84 (dd, J₁=29.7 Hz, J₂=18 Hz,2H C21-CH₂Br), 5.80 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.67 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's), 7.05 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). Anal. Calcd.for C₃₂H₃₉NO₆.⅓H₂O: C, 71.22; H, 7.41; N, 2.60. Found: C, 71.27; H,7.35; N, 2.61.

Example 5

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-acetoxy-21-acetylthio-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(17).

Step 1.17α-Hydroxy-21-acetylthio-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(16)

The 17α-Hydroxy-21-bromo compound (7B) (2.79 g, 5.44 mmol) dissolved inacetone (150 mL) was refluxed with sodium iodide (8.16 g, 54.4 mmol) for1 hr in an atmosphere of nitrogen and then filtered directly into asuspension of potassium thioacetate (6.2 g, 54.4 mmol) in acetone (150mL). After refluxing for an additional 2.5 hrs, the reaction mixture wascooled to room temperature, filtered, concentrated in vacuo, dilutedwith H₂O and extracted with CH₂Cl₂. The organic fractions were washedwith H₂O and brine, combined and dried over sodium sulfate. The filtratewas evaporated and the residue was purified via flash silica gel column(6% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) to afford 1.99 g of 16 as a yellow foam in 72.1%yield. Crystallization of the foam from EtOAc/hexanes gave yellowcrystals with m.p. 197-198° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max)3483, 2943, 1722, 1696, 1642, 1615, 1585 and 1520 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ0.40 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.41 (s, 3H, Ac), 2.93 (s, 6H, NMe₂), 3.32 (s,1H, C17α-OH), 3.65 and 4.31 (AB-System, J=16.5 Hz, 2H, C21-CH₂), 4.36(br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.73 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.66 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 7.07 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI)m/z (relative intensity): 507 (M⁺). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₀H₃₇O₄NS: C,70.79; H, 7.35; N, 2.76; S, 6.31. Found: C, 70.97; H, 2.75; N, 2.76; S,6.29.

Step 2. Preparation of the Target Compound (17)

Under nitrogen, trifluoroacetic anhydride (8.5 mL, 61.95 mmol), glacialacetic acid (3.5 mL, 60.7 mmol) and dry CH₂Cl₂ (100 mL) were combinedand stirred at room temperature for 20 min. The mixture was cooled to 0°C. in an ice bath and p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (0.5 g, 2.65mmol) was added. A solution of the 17α-alcohol (16) (1.99 g, 3.99 mmol)in dry CH₂Cl₂ was added and the mixture stirred at 0-5° C. for 10 hr.The mixture was neutralized with saturated NaHCO₃ solution and extractedwith CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions were washed with H₂O (3×),combined and dried over Na₂SO₄. The filtrate was evaporated and theresidue was purified via flash silica gel column (4.6% acetone/CH₂Cl₂)to afford 1.73 g of 17 as a yellow foam in 80.4% yield: m.p.=123-124° C.MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 549 (M⁺). FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance) ν_(max) 2946, 1736, 1692, 1663, 1611 and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR(CDCl₃) δ 0.39 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.18 (s, 3H, OAc), 2.38 (s, 3H, SAc),2.92 (s, 6H, NMe₂), 3.91 (s, 2H, 21-CH₂), 4.44 (br d, 1H, C lc-CH), 5.78(s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.67 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.08 (d,J=9 Hz, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₂H₃₉NO₅S: C, 69.92;H, 7.15; N, 2.55; S, 5.83. Found: C, 69.66; H, 7.12; N, 2.58; S, 5.59.

Example 6

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-acetoxy-21-methyl-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(28)

Step 1.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-17α-trimethylsilyloxyestra-5(10),9(11)-dien-17α-aldehyde(21)

The cyano trimethylsilyl ether (2) (16 g, 38.7 mmol) was dissolved inTHF (30 mL, distilled from lithium aluminum hydride (LAH)) in oven-driedglassware, and t-butyl methyl ether (300 mL) was added. The mixture wascooled to 0° C. in an ice bath. diisobutylaluminum hydride (DIBAL-H) (75mL, 1 M in toluene) was added to the mixture over 30 min. using anaddition funnel. The reaction mixture was stirred under nitrogen at roomtemperature and monitored by HPLC (on a NovaPak C₁₈ column eluted withCH₃CN/H₂O/75:25). The reaction was complete after 4 hr. It was cooled to0° C. in an ice bath and aq. acetic acid (40 mL, 50%) was added. Themixture was diluted with H₂O and extracted with ether (3×). The etherextracts were washed with 10% acetic acid, H₂O, saturated NaHCO₃solution, H₂O and brine. The combined organic layers were dried overNa₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo to yield 15.11 g of the crude aldehyde(21). Flash chromatography using 1% THF/CH₂Cl₂ gave 10.6 g of the pureproduct as a white solid in 65% yield; m.p.=105-109° C. MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 416 (M⁺, 30), 270(47), 169 (44), 129 (47), 99(73),86 (31) and 73 (100). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 2910 and1731 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.11 (s, 9H, Si(CH₃)₃), 0.67 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃),3.98 (s, 4H, OCH₂CH₂O), 5.60 (br s, 1H, C11-CH═) and 9.67 (s, 1H,C173-CHO). Anal. Calcd. for C₂₄H₃₆O₄Si.⅙ hexane (C₆H₁₄): C, 69.67; H,8.60. Found: C, 69.07; H, 8.79.

Step 2.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-17α-trimethylsilyloxy-20-hydroxy-21-methyl-19-norpregna-5(10),9(11)-diene(22)

In oven-dried glassware, the crude aldehyde (21) (30.35 g, 72.8 mmol)was dissolved in THF (432 mL, distilled from LAH) and cooled to 0° C.under nitrogen. Ethyl magnesium bromide (37 mL, 3 M in ether) wastransferred via double-tipped needles to an additional funnel and thenslowly added to the reaction mixture. The mixture was stirred at roomtemperature and monitored by TLC (2% acetone/CH₂Cl₂). Reaction wascomplete in 3 hr, so mixture was cooled to 0° C. and saturated NH₄Clsolution (310 mL) was added slowly. THF was evaporated in vacuo. Themixture was extracted with ether (3×) and brine, and dried over Na₂SO₄.The solvent was evaporated, yielding 31.03 g of the crude 20-hydroxyproduct (22) as a foam in 95% yield. This material was directly usedwithout further purification in the subsequent reaction. FTIR (KBr,diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3503 and 2951 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.16 (s,9H, Si(CH₃)₃), 0.75, 0.78 (2s, C18-CH₃ for 20α- and 20β-isomers), 1.01(t, J=6 Hz, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.98 (s, 4H, 3-OCH₂CH₂O—) and 5.60 (br s, 1H,C11-CH═). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 447 (M⁺, 4.2), 418(17),387(32), 356 (70) and 297 (100).

Step 3.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-17α-trimethylsilyloxy-21-methyl-19-norpregna-5(10),9(11)-dien-20-one (23)

The C-20 alcohol (22) (25.34 g, 56.7 mmol) was dissolved in acetone andstirred at 0° C. in an ice bath. Jones' reagent (42 mL) was added slowlyto the above solution until the reaction mixture remained an orangecolor. Then isopropanol was added until the green color persisted. IceH₂O (2 L) was added and stirred well. The mixture was extracted withEtOAc (3×), washed with H₂O (2×), saturated NaHCO₃, H₂O and brine. Thecombined organic layers were dried over Na₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuoto give 18.83 g of the crude ketone (23). Flash chromatography using 1%ether/CH₂Cl₂ gave 7.3 g of the purified product as a foam in 29% yield.NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.10 (s, 9H, Si(CH₃)₃), 0.51 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.04 (t,J=7 Hz, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.99 (s, 4H, C3-ketal) and 5.61 (br s, 1H,C11-CH═).

Step 4.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α,10α-epoxy-17α-trimethylsilyloxy-21-methyl-19-norpregna-9(11)-en-20-one(24)

Hexafluoroacetone trihydrate (2.20 g, 10 mmol) and CH₂Cl₂ (23 mL) werestirred vigorously under nitrogen in an ice bath. Solid Na₂HPO₄ (0.78 g,6.5 mmol) was added. 30% Hydrogen peroxide (1.50 mL) was poured into themixture. It was stirred 30 min. A chilled solution of the C-20 ketone(3) (3.00 g, 6.75 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (23 mL) was added slowly with apipette. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight in the cold room at4° C. TLC (2% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) showed reaction complete in the morning.CH₂Cl₂ was added to the reaction mixture and it was washed with Na₂SO₃(2×), saturated NaHCO₃, and brine. Organic extracts were dried overNa₂SO₄ and concentrated to give 2.98 g of a 77:25 mixture of the crudeα:β-epoxide (24) according to NMR in 95% yield. This mixture wasdirectly used in the subsequent reaction without further purification.NMR (CDCl₃) 0.10 (s, 9H, Si(CH₃)₃), 0.51 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.05 (t, J=6Hz, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.94 (s, 4H, 3-OCH₂CH₂O—), 5.90 (br s, 1H, C11-CH═ forβ-epoxide) and 6.09 (br s, 1H, C11-CH═ for α-epoxide).

Step 5.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-α-hydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-7α-trimethylsilyloxy-21-methyl-19-norpregn-9(10)-en-20-one(25)

Mg (2.80 g, 116.2 mmol), which was washed with 0.1 N HCl, then H₂O andacetone and dried in vacuo, was weighed into dry round-bottomed flaskequipped with a reflux condenser. A small crystal of iodine was addedand the system was flushed with nitrogen and flame-dried. The flask wascooled to room temperature and 68.5 mL of THF distilled from LAH wasadded via syringe. 1,2-Dibromoethane (approx. 0.5 mL) was added and themixture was stirred at room temperature. After bubbling began and thecolor of 12 disappeared, a solution of 4-bromo-N,N-dimethylaniline(20.43 g, 102.1 mmol) in THF (34 mL) was added via syringe. The mixturewas stirred until most the Mg had reacted. Copper (I) chloride (1.13 g,114.2 mmol) was added as a solid and stirred for 20 min. The crudeepoxide (24) (7.33 g, 15.91 mmol) in THF (49 mL) was then added using asyringe. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30min, at which time the reaction was complete by TLC (2% acetone/CH₂Cl₂).Saturated NH₄Cl solution (25 mL) was added and stirred for 30 min whileair was pulled through by slight vacuum. The mixture was diluted withH₂O, extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×), washed with H₂O (2×) and brine, driedover Na₂SO₄, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue waspurified by flash chromatography using 3% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) to afford 4.27g of the pure product (25) in 46.1% yield. IR (KBr, diffuse reflectance)ν_(max) 3531, 2940, 1708, 1614, and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.09 (s,9H, Si(CH₃)₃), 0.19 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.02 (t, J=7 Hz, 3H, C21-CH₃),2.88 (s, 6H, N(CH₃)₂), 3.99 (m, 4H, C3-OCH₂CH₂O—), 4.26 (br d, 1H,C11α-CH), 6.85 (dd, J=41 Hz, J′=10 Hz, 4H, aromatic-CH). MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 581 (M⁺, 46), 563(34), 391 (37), 134 (65) and 121(100).

Step 6.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5,17α-dihydroxy-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-21-methyl-19-norpregn-9(10)-en-20-one(26)

Tetrabutylammonium fluoride (18.1 mL, 1 M in THF) was stirred withmolecular sieves under nitrogen for approx. 1 hr. The17α-trimethylsilyloxy compound (25) (3.50 g, 6.0 mmol) in THF (21 mL)which was distilled from LAH, was added to the mixture and stirred atroom temperature for 1 hr. H₂O was added and the THF was removed invacuo. EtOAc was added to the mixture and was filtered through Celite.The product was extracted with EtOAc, washed with H₂O and brine, anddried over Na₂SO₄. Evaporation of the solvent gave 3.19 g of the crude5α,17α-dihydroxy compound (26) in quantitative yield. This material wasdirectly used without further purification in the subsequent reaction.IR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3506, 2934, 1704, 1613 and 1518cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.36 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.03 (t, J=7 Hz, 3H,C21-CH₃), 2.84 (s, 6H, N(CH₃)₂), 4.00 (s, 4H, C3-OCH₂CH₂O—), 4.16 (d,1H, C11α-CH) and 6.85 (dd, J=29 Hz, J′=10 Hz 4H, aromatic-CH's). MS (EI)m/z (relative intensity): 509 (M⁺, 20), 491 (11), 134 (27) and 121 (100)

Step 7.17α-Hydroxy-21-methyl-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(27)

The 5α,17α-dihydroxy compound (26) (3.19 g, 6.26 mmol) was dissolved inTHF (25 mL). Glacial acetic acid (75 mL) was added, followed by H₂O (25mL). The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature at which timeTLC (10% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) showed reaction complete in the morning. TheTHF and acetic acid were removed under high vacuum and the residue wasextracted with EtOAc (3×) and washed with saturated NaHCO₃ solution, H₂Oand brine. The combined organic extracts were dried over Na₂SO₄ andconcentrated in vacuo to afford 2.81 g of the crude diene dione17-alcohol (27) as a foam in 100% yield. IR (KBr, diffuse reflectance)ν_(max) 3419, 2942, 1705, 1655, 1612 and 1581 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.40(s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.02 (t, J=7 Hz, 3H, C21-CH₃), 2.88 (s, 6H, N(CH₃)₃),4.37 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.76 (s, 1H, C4-CH═) and 6.85 (dd, J=24 Hz,J′=9 Hz, 4H, aromatic-CH's), MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 447 (M⁺,25), 211 (4), 134 (23) and 121 (100).

Step 8. Preparation of the Target Compound (28)

In oven-dried glassware, trifluoroacetic anhydride (18.75 mL) andglacial acetic acid (7.2 mL) were added to CH₂Cl₂ (50 mL) and stirredfor 30 min. under nitrogen at room temperature. Solid p-toluenesulfonicacid monohydrate (1.19 g) was added and the mixture was cooled to 0° C.in an ice bath. The 17-alcohol (27) (2.77 g, 6.17 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (22mL) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at 0° C. for 1.5 hr.Saturated K₂CO₃ was carefully added dropwise until the bubbling of CO₂ceased. The mixture was diluted with H₂O, extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×),and washed with H₂O (2×) and brine. The organic layers were filteredthrough Na₂SO₄ and concentrated under reduced pressure to yield 3.12 gof the crude product (28). The crude acetate was purified by flashchromatography using 3.5% acetone/CH₂Cl₂ and fractions >98% pure by HPLC(70% MeOH/30% H₂O/0.03% TEA) were triturated in heptane to form 600 mgof a pale yellow amorphous solid in 20% yield. Analysis of the solid byHPLC using the same eluent at λ=260 nm indicated it to be 100% purity:m.p.=125-133° C.; [α]²⁷ _(D)=+163.16° (c=1.0, CHCl₃). FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance) ν_(max) 1732, 1713 and 1662 cm⁻¹. MS (EI) m/z (relativeintensity): 489 (M⁺, 27), 372(4), 251 (4), 134 (14) and 121 (100). NMR(CDCl₃), δ 0.330 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.039 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 3H, C21-CH₃),2.112 (s, 3H, C17α-OAc), 2.904 (s, 6H, N(CH₃)₂), 4.380 (d, J=6.6 Hz, 1H,C11α-CH), 5.773 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.635 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 6.978 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). Anal.Calcd. for C₃₁H₃₉O₄N: C, 76.04; H, 8.03; N, 2.86. Found: C, 76.03; H,8.05; N, 2.91.

Example 7

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-acetoxy-21-hydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(41).

Step 1. Synthesis of17α,21-(1-Ethoxyethylidenedioxy)-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(18)

A solution of the 17α,21-diol (9) (1.0 g, 1.11 mmol), triethylorthoacetate (2 mL, 10.9 mmol) and pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (0.1 g,0.4 mmol) in benzene (50 mL) was heated to reflux under nitrogen in asystem equipped with a Dean-Stark trap for removal of water. After 1 hrof reflux, monitoring by TLC (5% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) indicated a completereaction. Pyridine (1 mL, 12.4 mmol) was added and the reaction mixtureconcentrated in vacuo under a stream of nitrogen at 40-50° C. Theresidue was diluted with water (approx. 100 mL) and extracted withCH₂Cl₂ (3×). The combined organic extracts were washed with H₂O (2×) andbrine (1×), filtered through Na₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo.Purification of the residue via Flash chromatography (3% acetone/CH₂Cl₂)followed by crystallization from ether/pentane gave 0.81 g of theintermediate ethoxyethylidenedioxy compound (18) as a white amorphoussolid in 70% yield. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 2947, 1716,1660, 1614, 1599 and 1518 cm⁻¹. MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 519(M⁺, 65), 308 (23), 134 (31) and 121 (100).

NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.33 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.13 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 3H, OCH₂ CH₃ ),1.60 (s, 3H, ethylidenedioxy CH₃), 2.90 (s, 6H, NMe₂), 3.59 (q, J=7.5Hz, 2H, OCH₂ CH₃), 4.13 (dd, J₁=25.8, J₂=17.4 Hz, 2H, C21-CH₂), 4.43(br. d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.80 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.67 (d, J=9 Hz,2H, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.07 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's).Anal. Calcd. for C₃₂H₄₁NO₅: C, 73.96: H, 7.95; N, 2.70. Found: C, 73.70;H, 7.89; N, 2.73.

Step 2. Preparation of the Target Compound (41)

Under nitrogen, a mixture of the crude ethoxyethylidenedioxy compound(18, 0.56 g., 1.11 mmol), 0.2 M NaOAc (3 mL, 0.3 mmol) in methanol (30mL) was heated to reflux. Monitoring by TLC (5% acetone/CH₂Cl₂)indicated a complete reaction in 3.5 hours. The methanol was removed invacuo under a stream of nitrogen, the residue diluted with water (˜50mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions were combined,washed with H₂O (2×) and brine (1×), dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered andconcentrated in vacuo to give 0.56 g of the crude 21-ol, 17α-acetate(41) as a foam. Purification of this material via flash chromatography(7.5% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) followed by trituration with ether/pentane gave0.32 g of the target compound, 21-OH, 17α-acetate as an off-white solidin 84% yield; m.p.=205-210° C. The NMR indicated this product contains5.3% of the 17α-OH, 21-OAc (8) isomer as a contaminant. Compound 41 isextremely labile to base, rapidly converting to compound 8 under thereverse-phase conditions (MeOH/H₂O/Et₃N) normally employed for HPLCanalysis of related compounds. This transesterification occurs at anappreciate rate even when the solvent system is buffered at pH 7.0 withphosphoric acid. The purity of the acetate mixture (8 and 41) wasascertained at >99% by normal phase HPLC analysis (Waters AssociatesPorasil Silica using CH₃CN/CH₂Cl₂ (40:60) with a flow rate of 2 mL/minat λ=302 nm). Under these conditions, the two acetates have an identicalretention time of 4.69 min. MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 491 (M⁺,45), 431(32), 134 (7) and 121 (100). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance)ν_(max) 3362, 2949, 2886, 1730, 1656, 1611, 1597 and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR (300MHz, CDCl₃) δ 0.37 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.11 (s, 3H, C17α-OAc), 2.90 (s,6H, NMe₂), 4.23 (d, J=17.4, 1H, C21-CH₂), 4.36 (d, J=17.4 Hz, 1H,C21-CH₂), 4.39 (d, J=6 Hz, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.78 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.63 (d,J=8.7 Hz, 2H, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's), 6.97 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's). The presence of the 17α-OH, 21-OAc isomer (8) to theextent of 5.3% could be detected by the appearance of two doublets, oneat 4.88 and the other at 5.11, both with J=18.3 Hz.

Example 8

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-acetoxy-21-(3′-cyclopentylpropionyloxy)-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregnadiene-3,20-dione(40).

Step 1.17α-Hydroxy-21-(3′-cyclopentylpropionyloxy)-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(39)

Under nitrogen, a solution of the diol (9, 0.5 g, 1.11 mmol) in drybenzene (20 mL) and pyridine (1 mL, 12.4 mmol) was treated with3-cyclopentylpropionyl chloride (0.2 mL, 1.31 mmol). The reactionmixture was stirred at room temperature and monitored by TLC (10%acetone/CH₂Cl₂) which indicated about a 50% reaction after 1 hr.Additional cypionyl chloride (0.2 mL, 1.31 mmol) was introduced and thereaction was stirred a further 1 hr. at room temperature. Analysis byTLC at that time indicated a complete reaction. The reaction mixture wasconcentrated in vacuo under a stream of nitrogen and the residue wasdiluted with water. The mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). Theorganic fractions were combined, and washed with H₂O (2×), brine (1×),dried (Na₂SO₄), filtered and concentrated in vacuo to give 0.63 g of theresidue as an oil. Purification of this material by flash chromatographyusing 7% acetone/CH₂Cl₂ gave 0.51 g of the 17α-hydroxy 21-cypionate (39)as an oil. Trituration of this material with ether afforded 0.43 g of apure solid (39) in 67% yield; m.p.=137-140° C. MS (EI) m/z relativeintensity: 573 (M⁺, 46), 431 (11), 134 (15) and 121 (100). FTIR (KBr,diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3509, 2944, 1726, 1643, 1613 and 1520 cm⁻¹.NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.38 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.90 (s, 6H, NMe₂), 4.4 (br d, J=6Hz, C11α-CH), 5.03 (dd, J₁=31.5 Hz, J₂=18 Hz, 2H, C21-CH2-), 5.76 (s,1H, C4-CH═), 6.67 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.07 (d, J=9Hz, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's).

Step 2. Preparation of the Target Compound (40)

Under nitrogen, trifluoroacetic anhydride (2.0 mL, 14.2 mmol), glacialacetic acid (0.8 mL, 13.99 mmol) and dry CH₂Cl₂ (10 mL) were combinedand stirred at room temperature for hr. The mixture was cooled to 0° C.in an ice bath and p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (1 g, 0.53 mmol)was added to it. A solution of the 17α-hydroxy-21-cypionate (39, 0.4 g,0.7 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ was then introduced and the reaction mixturestirred at 0° C. and monitored by TLC (5% acetone/CH₂Cl₂). After 2 hr.at 0° C. it became apparent that this particular reaction was proceedingat a much slower rate than observed for other 17α-acetylations. Theice-bath was removed and the reaction was then stirred and monitored byTLC at room temperature. After 6 hr. at room temperature, TLC indicated˜75% conversion. The reaction mixture was then diluted with H₂O (10 mL),neutralized with concentrated NH₄OH solution and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3×). The organic fractions were combined, washed with H₂O (2×), brine(1×), filtered through Na₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo to give 0.53 gof the residue as an oil. Purification via flash chromatography (5%acetone/CH₂Cl₂) gave 0.21 g of the pure 17-acetate (40) as a foam. Thismaterial was dissolved in EtOH (˜2 mL) and precipitated as a yellowamorphous solid upon dilution with H₂O, sonication and cooling to give0.21 g of the pure solid (40) in 28% yield: mp. softens at 96° C. MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity): 615 (M⁺, 80), 555 (10), 372 (18), 134(14) and 120 (100) FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 2950, 2868,1737, 1664, 1612 and 1519 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.43 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃),2.11 (s, 3H, OAc), 2.91 (s, 6H, NMe₂), 4.42 (br d, J=6 Hz, C11α-CH),4.84 (dd, J=29 Hz, J₂=17 Hz, 2H, 21-CH₂—OCyp), 5.80 (s, 1H, C4-CH═),6.70 (d, J=9 Hz, 2H, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.07 (d, 9 Hz, 2H, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's). Anal. Calcd. for C₈H₄₉NO₆.¼C₅H₁₂: C, 74.38; H, 8.27; N,2.21. Found: C, 74.39; H, 8.28; N, 2.20.

Example 9

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-acetoxy-21-methoxy-11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(38).

Step 1.17α-Bromomethyldimethylsilyloxy-17β-cyano-3,3-ethylenedioxyestra-5(10),9(11)-diene(29)

Under nitrogen and anhydrous conditions, a solution of the cyanohydrinketal (1, 35.45 g (104 mmol)), dimethylaminopyridine (6.33 g, 52 mmol)and dry Et₃N (21.7 mL, 155 mmol) in dry THF (300 mL) was stirred at roomtemperature overnight. After that time, TLC using 2% acetone/CH₂Cl₂indicated approximately 95% completion of reaction. The mixture wasdiluted with hexanes (˜250 mL), stirred at −10 minutes, filtered throughCelite and concentrated in vacuo to give the residue (46.38 g) evidencedby TLC to consist of a mixture of the expected product (29) plus DMAPhydrochloride salt. This material was purified via silica flashchromatography using ether as eluent to give the silyl ether (29, 35.53g, 69.5%). This material was used directly in the subsequent reactionwithout further purification or characterization.

Step 2. 17α-Hydroxy-21-bromo-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (30)

Under nitrogen, a solution of the crude 17α-bromo compound (2, 35.53 g,72 mmol) in dry THF (1200 mL) was cooled to −78° C. in a dryice/isopropanol bath and treated dropwise with a 1.5 M solution oflithium diisopropylamide in cyclohexane (105 mL, 157.5 mmol) over aperiod of ˜15 minutes. This mixture was stirred at −78° C. for 1 hr.Aqueous HBr (4.45 M, 350 mL, 1.56 mol) was added slowly and the mixtureallowed to warm to room temperature, and stirred for 30 min. A TLC using5% acetone/CH₂C2 taken at that time indicated an incomplete reaction (3products). The mixture was then stirred again at room temperatureovernight. Analysis by TLC at that time indicated formation of 1 majorproduct. The reaction mixture was then cooled in an ice bath, carefullyneutralized with concentrated NH₄OH solution (105 mL) and extracted withEtOAc (3×). The organic fractions were washed with H₂O (2×), combined,dried over Na₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo. Trituration of the solidresidue with ether gave the 17α-hydroxy-21-bromo compound 30, 17.14 g)in 60.4% yield as an off-white powder. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance)ν_(max) 3476, 2948, 1726, 1644, 1598 and 1572 cm⁻¹. NMR (DMSO-d₆+CDCl₃)δ 0.70 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 4.43 (dd J=27 Hz, J₂=15 Hz, 2H, C21-CH₂Br) and5.60 (s, 1H, C4-CH═). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 392 (M⁺, 11),313 (100), 159 (77) and 91 (71).

Step 3. 17α-hydroxy-21-acetoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (31)

The 21-bromo-17α-hydroxy compound 30, 6.57 g, 16.7 mmol) was added to a3-neck IL flask which had been purged with nitrogen, equipped with acondenser and a magnetic stir bar. Acetone (500 mL) was added, followedby potassium acetate (17.3 g, 176.2 mmol). The suspension was stirredmagnetically and brought to reflux under nitrogen. Several minutes afterreaching reflux, a solution formed. After ½ hr, the reaction wasexamined by TLC (silica: 5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂). All starting materialhad been converted to the product. The reaction was allowed to cool toroom temperature, precipitated KBr was removed by filtration, and thesolution evaporated in vacuo. The crude product (6.63 g) was obtained,taken up in CH₂Cl₂ and washed with H₂O (2×), followed by brine (1×). Thecombined organic extracts were filtered through Na₂SO₄ and evaporated invacuo to obtain 6.41 g of the 21-acetoxy-17α-hydroxy compound (31) in99% yield. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3474, 2946, 1744,1720, 1645 and 1607 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.80 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.13 (s,3H, C21-OAc), 5.0 (dd, 2H, C21-CH₂, J₁=24 Hz, J₂=9 Hz) and 5.68 (s, 1H,C4-CH═). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 372 (M⁺, 55), 312 (68), 271(69), 253 (97) and 213 (100).

Step 4. 17α,21-Dihydroxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (32)

A suspension of the 21-acetoxy-17α-hydroxy compound (31, 9.43 g, 25.32mmol) in MeOH (800 mL) was deoxygenated by purging with nitrogen for ½hr. A similarly deoxygenated 0.5 M solution of KHCO₃ (78 mL, 39 mmol)was added to the suspension and the mixture brought to reflux undernitrogen. Almost immediately after addition of KHCO₃, a solution formed.After ½ hr at reflux, the reaction mixture was examined by TLC (silica;5% isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂). The reaction was >95% complete. The reactionwas allowed to cool to room temperature, then neutralized by addition of2.24 mL (39 mmol) of glacial acetic acid. CH₃OH was evaporated in vacuo.The residue was taken up in 500 mL of CH₂Cl₂ and washed with H₂O (3×).Combined organic extracts were dried by filtration through Na₂SO₄, andevaporated in vacuo to recover an amorphous yellow material (2, 8.50 g)in 100% yield. This material was readily crystallized from hot acetone(100 mL). The crystals were collected on a Buchner funnel, trituratedwell with ether, and air dried. It gave 4.82 g of 32 in 57.6% yield.Additional material was obtained by chromatography of the motherliquors. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3517, 2944, 1714, 1657,1598 and 1578 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.82 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 4.53 (dd, 2H,C21-CH₂—, J₁=42 Hz, J₂=21 Hz), 5.72 (s, 1H, C4-CH═). MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 330 (M⁺, 100), 253 (83), 228 (98), 213 (95) and 91(91).

Step 5.3,20-bis-Ethylenedioxy-17α,21-dihydroxy-19-norpregna-5(10),9(11)-diene(33)

A quantity of 3.8 g (11.5 mmol) of the 17α,21-dihydroxy compound (32,200 mg, 1.05 mmol) of p-toluenesulfonic acid, and 300 mL of ethyleneglycol were placed in a 500 mL of round bottom flask equipped with avacuum distillation head. The mixture was heated in an oil bath and thetemperature was maintained at 100-105° C. Ethylene glycol was distilledin vacuo (5 mm Hg), at a temperature of 75° C. The reaction continuedfor 3 hr. and was allowed to cool to room temperature. Saturated NaHCO₃solution was added and the mixture extracted with CH₂Cl₂. The organicextract was washed with H₂O (1×) and brine (1×). The organic extractswere dried by filtration through Na₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo. Crudediketal (6.2 g) was obtained. Examination of this material by TLC(silica, 5% isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂) indicated almost all startingmaterial had been converted to the diketal as a major product withR_(f)=0.38, an intermediate product as a minor product with R_(f)=0.63,or a third material with R_(f)=0.63 which increases if the reaction isallowed to go too long. The crude material was crystallized from 30 mLof hot CH₂Cl₂. The crystals were collected on a Buchner funnel,triturated well with ether and air dried to give 3.01 g of 33 in 62.5%yield. This product was considered sufficiently pure to be carried outon the next reaction. Highly pure material was obtained by flash columnchromatography using 5% isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂. FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance) ν_(max) 3418 and 2896 cm⁻¹; no evidence of any absorptionsin the CO region. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.8 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 3.88 (m, 10H, C3-and C20-OCH₂CH₂O—, C21-CH₂), 4.0 (s, 4H, C3-OCH₂CH₂O—), 5.58 (br s, 1H,C11-CH═). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 418 (M⁺, 2), 387 (1.4), 297(3) and 103 (100).

Step 6.3,20-bis-(Ethylenedioxy)-17β-hydroxy-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-5(10),9(11)-diene(34)

To a solution of the 17α,21-dihydroxy diketal (33, 2.0 g, 4.78 mmol) inCH₂Cl₂ (250 mL) was added 7.20 g (33.6 mmol) of solid1,8-bis(dimethylamino)-naphthalene (“proton sponge”) followed by 4.97 g(33.6 mmol) of trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate. The heterogeneousmixture was stirred in an ice bath under nitrogen, and allowed to cometo room temperature as the bath melted. After 2.5 hr., TLC (silica; 5%isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂) indicated the reaction was complete. The mixturewas transferred to a separatory funnel and washed with ice cold 1N HCl(250 mL), saturated NaHCO₃ solution and H₂O. The combined organicextracts (3×) were dried by filtration through solid Na₂SO₄ andevaporated in vacuo. Examination by TLC indicated the resulting yellowoil was heavily contaminated with a base. The oil was taken up in CH₂Cl₂(75 mL) and stirred vigorously with Dowex 50×8-200 (80 mL, dry volume)for 15 minutes. This effectively removed all the remaining protonsponge. The mixture was filtered and the Dowex washed well with CH₂Cl₂.Methylene chloride was evaporated in vacuo and the residue driedovernight under high vacuum to give a pale foam, 1.63 g in 79% yield.This material was sufficiently pure to carry on to the next reaction.Highly pure material was obtained by flash column chromatography elutingwith 20% EtOAc in CH₂Cl₂, followed by crystallization from a smallamount of methanol with water. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max)3510, 2898, 1720, 1450 and 1370 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.8 (s, 3H,C18-CH₃), 3.43 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 3.67 (dd, 2H, C21-CH₂, J₁=18 Hz,J₂=10.5 Hz), 4.0 (s, 4H, C3-OCH₂CH₂O), 4.09 (m, 8H, C3- andC20-OCH₂CH₂O) and 5.58 (br s, 1H, C11-CH═). MS (EI) m/z (relativeintensity): 432 (M⁺, 1.4), 387 (3), 297 (2.6) and 117 (100).

Step 7.3,20-bis-(Ethylenedioxy)-5α,10α-epoxy-17α-hydroxy-21-methoxy-19-norpregn-9(11)-ene(35)

Solid Na₂HPO₄ (0.45 g, 3.14 mmol) and 30% H₂O₂ (0.84 mL) were added to avigorously stirred solution of hexafluoroacetone trihydrate (1.24 g,0.79 mL, 5.7 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (13 mL). The mixture was stirred undernitrogen in an ice bath for ½ hr. A chilled solution of the21-methoxy-17α-hydroxy compound (34, 1.63 g, 3.77 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (13mL) was added slowly via pipette. The reaction was transferred to thecold room and allowed to stir overnight at 4° C. The next morning,examination by TLC (silica; 25% EtOAc in CH₂Cl₂) indicated all startingmaterial had been converted to a mixture of two more polar components.Methylene chloride (25 mL) was added and the mixture washed with 10%Na₂SO₃ (2×), saturated NaHCO₃ solution and H₂O. The combined organicextracts (3×) were dried by filtration through Na₂SO₄, evaporated invacuo and dried several hours under high vacuum to give 1.86 g of anamorphous solid in quantitative yield, which consists of at least, 4epoxides evidenced by ¹H NMR.

NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.77 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 3.40 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 3.60 (dd,C21-CH₂, J₁=15 Hz, J₂=9 Hz), 3.9 (s, C3-OCH₂CH₂O), 4.0 (m, C3- andC20-OCH₂CH₂O), 5.83 (br s, C11-CH═ of β-epoxide) and 6.03 (br s, C11-CH═of α-epoxide).

Step 8. 3,20-bis-(Ethylenedioxy)-5α,17α-dihydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-methoxy-19-norpregn-9(10)-ene (36)

A 100 mL round bottom flask was equipped with a magnetic stirrer, areflux condenser and a rubber septum and flame dried under a stream ofN₂. Magnesium (0.50 g, 20.7 mmol) was added, followed by a crystal ofiodine, dry THF (20 mL) and 1-2 drops of dibromoethane. The mixture washeated in a warm H₂O bath under N₂ for approximately ½ hr, but therewere no observable change. A solution of 4-bromo-N,N-dimethylaniline(3.77 g, 18.85 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was added via syringe over a periodof several minutes and rinsed with an additional THF (10 mL). There wasevidence of reaction immediately as the magnesium turned dark. Afterstirring for 1.5 hr., solid copper(I) chloride (0.21 g, 2.07 mmol), wasadded and the reaction mixture stirred another ½ hr. Crude epoxide(assumed 3.77 mmol from the previous reaction) was added as a solutionin THF (5 mL) and rinsed in with an additional THF (5 mL). The reactionwas allowed to stir 1 hr at room temperature and then quenched by theaddition of saturated ammonium chloride (50 mL). Air was drawn throughthe mixture with vigorous stirring for ½ hr. Ether was added and thelayers allowed to separate. The organic solution was washed with 10%NH₄Cl (2×), 2 N NH₄OH (3×) and brine (1×). Organic fractions werecombined, dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered and evaporated in vacuo to obtain3.37 g of crude material. Analysis by TLC (silica; 20% acetone inCH₂Cl₂) indicated formation of a new more polar compound. Flash columnchromatography (silica; 20% acetone in CH₂Cl₂), yielded 0.890 g of thepure product in 63% yield, assuming 66% of the starting material was thedesired 5α, 10α-epoxide). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3494,2936, 1612 and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.47 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.90 (s,6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 3.43 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 4.03 (m, 10H, C3- andC20-OCH₂CH₂O— and C21-CH₂), 6.67 (d, 2H, aromatic-CH's, J=9 Hz), and7.10 (d, 2H, aromatic-CH's, J=9 Hz). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity):569 (M⁺, 4), 551 (11), 506 (4), 134 (27), 121 (49) and 117 (100). Anal.Calcd. for C₃₃H₄₇O₇N: C, 69.57; H, 8.31; N, 2.46. Found: C, 69.40; H,8.19; N, 2.53.

Step 9.17α-Hydroxy-21-methoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(37)

The diketal (6, 1.81 g, 3.18 mmol) was dissolved in THF (20 mL) and thesolution stirred magnetically at room temperature under nitrogen.Trifluoroacetic acid (60 mL) was added followed by H₂O (20 mL). After 1hr., the reaction was examined by TLC (silica; 20% acetone in CH₂Cl₂;neutralized with conc. NH₄OH before developing). All starting materialhad been converted to the product. The reaction was neutralized by thecareful addition of conc. NH₄OH (55 mL). Enough additional NH₄OH wasadded to bring the pH between 6 and 7. The product was extracted byCH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic extracts were combined, washed with H₂O (1×)and dried by filtration through Na₂SO₄. Evaporation in vacuo followed bydrying overnight under high vacuum gave 37 as an amber glass (1.42 g,96.3%). The resulting oil was crystallized by trituration with H₂O andscratching and sonicating to produce a fine bright yellow powder. FTIR(KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3408, 2943, 1722, 1663, 1612 and 1518cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.37 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.90 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 3.43(s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 4.43 (dd, 2H, C21-CH₂, J₁=27 Hz, J₂=18 Hz), 5.77 (s,1H, C4-CH═), 6.65 (d, 2H, aromatic-CH's, J=9 Hz) and 7.03 (d, 2H,aromatic-CH's, J=9 Hz). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 463 (M⁺, 20),134 (21) and 121 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₂₉H₃₇O₄N.⅔H₂O: C, 73.23; H,8.12; N, 2.94. Found: C, 73.09; H, 7.88; N, 2.97.

Step 10. Preparation of the Target Compound (38)

A mixture of CH₂Cl₂ (35 mL), trifluoroacetic anhydride (6.0 mL) andglacial acetic acid (2.43 mL) was allowed to stir at room temperatureunder nitrogen. After 2 hr, the mixture was cooled to 0° C. in an icewater bath and p-toluenesulfonic acid (350 mg) was added. A solution ofthe 17α-hydroxy-21-methoxy compound (37, 730 mg, 1.57 mmol) was added inCH₂Cl₂ (4 mL) and rinsed in with CH₂Cl₂ (2×4 mL). After stirring 1.5 hrat 0° C., examination by TLC (silica; 10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂, afterneutralization by NH₄OH) indicated the reaction was >95% complete. Thereaction mixture was diluted with H₂O (35 mL) and neutralized withconcentrated NH₄OH. The product was extracted by CH₂Cl₂ (3×) and brine(1×). The combined organic extracts were dried by filtration throughNa₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo to give 0.91 g of the crude product.Flash column chromatography on silica using 10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂followed by evaporation in vacuo and drying under high vacuum produced38 as a pure pale yellow foam (0.6 g, 75.8%). Treatment with pentanefollowed by sonicating produced a fine powder: m.p. softens at 116° C.HPLC analysis on a NovaPak C₁₈ column eluted with 70% CH₃OH in H₂O with0.03% Et₃N at a flow rate of 1 mL per min at λ=302 indicated the product38 to be 98.06% pure with a retention time of t_(R)=5.08 min. FTIR(diffuse reflectance, KBr) ν_(max) 2940, 1734, 1663, 1612, 1518, 1446,1370, 1235, and 1124 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.38 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.08 (s,3H, OAc), 2.90 (s, 6H, NMe₂), 3.42 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 4.20 (dd, 2H,C21-CH₂, J₁=24 Hz, J₂=15 Hz), 5.80 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.67 (d, 2H,aromatic-CH's, J=9 Hz) and 7.0 (d, 2H, aromatic-CH's, J=9 Hz). MS (EI)m/z (relative intensity): 505 (M⁺, 75), 445 (1.1), 430 (8%), 372 (2.7),134 (16) and 121 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₁H₃₉O₅N: C, 73.64; H, 7.77;N, 2.77. Found: C, 73.34; H, 7.74; N, 2.70.

Example 10

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-acetoxy-21-ethoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(46).

Step 1.3,20-bis-(Ethylenedioxy)-17α-hydroxy-21-ethoxy-19-norpregna-5(10),9(11)-diene(42)

To a cold solution of the 17α,21-dihydroxy diketal (33, 5.66 g, 13.53mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (700 mL) in an ice bath under nitrogen was added 20.3 g(94.7 mmol) of solid 1,8-bis-(dimethylamino)naphthalene (“protonsponge”), followed by triethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate (18.0 g, 94.7mmol). The reaction mixture was allowed to gradually warm to roomtemperature as the ice bath melted. After 1 hr, TLC (silica; 5%isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂) indicated the reaction was >95% complete. Thereaction was quenched after a total time of 2 hr by the addition of H₂O.The mixture was transferred to a separatory funnel and washed with H₂O(2×). The combined organic fractions were dried by filtration throughNa₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo. The resulting residue was taken up inEtOAc and washed with ice cold 1 N HCl (2×), saturated NaHCO₃ and H₂O.Combined organic fractions were filtered through Na₂SO₄ and evaporatedin vacuo to recover 6.86 g of an oil. Purification of this oil by flashcolumn chromatography on silica using 5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂ gave 4.37 gof a colorless foam in 72.4% yield: m.p.=softens at 62° C. FTIR (KBr,diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3485, 2889, 2738, 1440, 1371, 1216, 1120and 1058 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 0.8 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.22 (t, 3H,C21-OCH₂ CH₃ , J=6.9 Hz), 3.0 (s, 1H, C17α-OH), 3.46-3.82 (m, 4H,C21-CH₂ and C21-OCH₂ CH₃), 3.98 (s, 4H, C3-OCH₂CH₂O—), 3.84-4.28 (m, 8H,C3- and C20-OCH₂CH₂O), and 5.55 (br s, 1H, C11-CH═). MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 446 (M⁺,2), 400 (0.9), 387 (6.6), 369 (2.8), 297(5.5) and 131 (100).

Step 2.3,20-bis-(Ethylenedioxy)-5α,10α-epoxy-17α-hydroxy-21-ethoxy-19-norpregn-9(11)-ene(43)

To a solution of hexafluoroacetone trihydrate (2.05 mL, 14.7 mmol) inCH₂Cl₂ (35 mL), was added solid Na₂HPO₄ (1.17 g, 8.24 mmol) followed by30% H₂O₂ (2.2 mL). The mixture was stirred vigorously in an ice bathunder nitrogen for ½ hr. A chilled solution of the 21-ethoxy-17α-hydroxycompound (42, 4.37 g, 9.79 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (35 mL) was added slowly viapipette. The reaction was transferred to the cold room and allowed tostir overnight at 4° C. The next morning, examination of the reactionmixture by TLC (silica; 5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) indicated all of thestarting material had been converted to two more polar components inapproximately a 2:1 ratio. The reaction mixture was transferred to aseparatory funnel and washed with 10% Na₂SO₃ (2×), saturated NaHCO₃, H₂Oand brine. The combined organic fractions were filtered through Na₂SO₄and evaporated in vacuo to recover 4.84 g of a colorless foam.Trituration of this crude product with Et₂O produced a white solid. Thesolid was collected on a Buchner funnel and dried overnight in vacuo togive 1.73 g of white crystals in 38.1% yield. Examination of thismaterial by TLC and NMR indicated it was pure 5α,10α-epoxide (43).Purification of the mother liquors by flash column chromatography onsilica eluting with 7% acetone in CH₂Cl₂ gave an additional 0.6 g of5α,10α-epoxide (43). Total yield of purified 5α,10α-epoxide (43) was2.33 g (51.3%): m.p.=154-166° C. (dec). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance)ν_(max) 3566, 2934, 2890, 2441, 1375, 1212, 1118, 1064 and 1044 cm⁻¹.NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.78 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.2 (t, 3H, C21-OCH₂ CH₃ , J=6 Hz),2.88 (s, 1H, C17α-OH), 3.33-3.73 (m, 4H, C21-CH₂ and C21-OCH₂ CH₃), 3.93(s, 4H, C3-OCH₂CH₂O—), 3.73-4.27 (m, 8H, C3- and C20-OCH₂CH₂O), 6.03(br, s, 1H, C11-CH═). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 462 (M⁺, 1.1),403 (8.9), 385 (5.9), 131 (100) and 87 (32).

Step 3.3,20-bis-(Ethylenedioxy)-5α,17α-dihydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-ethoxy-19-norpregn-9(10)-ene(44)

A three-neck round bottom flask (250 mL) was equipped with a magneticstirrer, a condenser, a glass stopper and a rubber septum and flamedried under a stream of nitrogen. Magnesium was added (655 mg, 24.5mmol), followed by a crystal of iodine, 25 mL of dry THF, and 1-2 dropsof dibromoethane. After heating in a warm water bath for approximately ½hr under nitrogen, no observable change occurred. A solution of4-bromo-N,N-dimethylaniline (4.9 g, 24.5 mmol) in 13 mL of dry THF wasadded via syringe over a period of several minutes and rinsed in with anadditional 13 mL of THF. A reaction occurred almost immediately as theTHF began to reflux and the surface of the magnesium turned dark.Approximately 10 min. after the addition of the4-bromo-N,N-dimethylaniline, heating was discontinued, but the reactionwas allowed to remain in the bath. After stirring for 1.5 hr, copper (I)chloride (267 mg, 2.7 mmol) was added as a solid and stirring continuedfor another ½ hr. The 5α,10α-epoxide (43, 2.27 g, 4.9 mmol) was addedvia syringe as a solution in 6.5 mL of dry THF and rinsed in with 6.5 mLof THF. After 2 hr, examination of the reaction mixture by TLC on silica(20% acetone in CH₂Cl₂; quenched with saturated NH₄Cl before developing)indicated all epoxide had been converted to a new more polar material.The reaction was quenched by the addition of saturated NH₄Cl (65 mL) andair was drawn through the mixture for ½ hr with vigorous stirring. Thereaction mixture was transferred to a separatory funnel, ether added,and the layers allowed to separate. The organic fraction was washed with10% NH₄Cl (1×), 2 N NH₄OH (1×) and brine (1×). The combined organicfractions (3×) were filtered through Na₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo toobtain 5.62 g of crude material. This crude product was purified byflash column chromatography on silica. The column was first washed withCH₂Cl₂ to remove impurities with high R_(f) before eluting the productwith 20% acetone in CH₂Cl₂. Appropriate fractions were combined andevaporated in vacuo to give a crystallizing oil. Crystallization of thismaterial from a minimum amount of hot ether afforded 2.09 g of a paleblue powder (44) in 73% yield; m.p.=199-201° C. (dec). FTIR (KBr,diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3591, 3529, 3421, 2971, 2882, 1615, 1562,1519, 1443, 1354, 1190, 1122 and 1053 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.47 (s, 3H,C18-CH₃), 1.23 (t, 3H, C21-OCH₂ CH₃ , J=6 Hz), 2.90 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂),3.43-3.80 (m, 4H, C21-CH₂ and C21-OCH₂ CH₃), 3.80-4.33 (m, 9H, C3- andC20-OCH₂CH₂O—, and C11α-CH), 6.67 (d, 2H, aromatic-CH's, J=9 Hz), 7.10(d, 2H, aromatic-CH's, J=9 Hz). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 538(M⁺, 14), 565(19), 506 (13) and 131 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₄H₄₉O₇N:C, 69.96; H, 8.46; N, 2.40. Found: C, 69.78; H, 8.37; N, 2.35.

Step 4.17α-Hydroxy-21-ethoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(45)

The dihydroxy diketal 44, 2.0 g, 3.43 mmol) was dissolved in THF (20 mL)and stirred magnetically at room temperature under nitrogen.Trifluoroacetic acid (60 mL) was added followed by H₂O (20 mL). After 40min, TLC (20% acetone in CH₂Cl₂, neutralized with cone. NH₄OH beforedeveloping) indicated the reaction had gone to completion. The reactionwas allowed to continue another hour before neutralizing by the carefuladdition of cone. NH₄OH (55 mL). Additional NH₄OH was added to bring thepH to 6-7, CH₂Cl₂ was added, the mixture transferred to a separatoryfunnel, and the layers allowed to separate. The organic phase was washedagain with H₂O (1×), and brine (1×). Combined CH₂Cl₂ extracts (3×) werefiltered through Na₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo to give 1.73 g of anamber foam. Purification by flash column chromatography on silicaeluting with 20% acetone in CH₂Cl₂ afforded 1.28 g of pure 45 as abright yellow foam in 78% yield: m.p.=softens at 96° C. FTIR (KBr,diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3440, 2944, 2880, 1721, 1658, 1612, 1518,1443, 1347, 1211 and 1136 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.40 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.3(t, 3H, C21-OCH₂ CH₃ , J=6 Hz), 2.93 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 3.4-3.8 (m, 3H,C21-OCH₂ CH₃ and C17α-OH), 4.13-4.63 (m, 3H, C21-CH₂ and C11α-CH), 5.80(s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.68 (d, 2H, aromatic-CH's, J=9 Hz), 7.05 (d, 2H,aromatic-CH's, J=9 Hz). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 477 (M⁺, 42),280 (14), 134 (26) and 121 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₀H₃₉O₄N.H₂O: C,74.50; H, 8.21; N, 2.90. Found: C, 74.46; H, 8.21; N, 2.93.

Step 5. Preparation of the Target Compound (46)

A mixture of trifluoroacetic anhydride (9.77 mL), and glacial aceticacid (3.9 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (50 mL) was allowed to stir ½ hr under nitrogenat room temperature. The mixture was cooled to 0° C. in an ice bath andtoluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (0.57 g, 3 mmol) was added. A solutionof the 17α-hydroxy-21-ethoxy compound (45, 1.22 g, 2.55 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(10 mL) was added to the above mixture, and then rinsed in with 10 mL ofCH₂Cl₂. After stirring 2 hr at 0° C., the reaction was examined by TLC(silica; 10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂, neutralized with cone. NH₄OH beforedeveloping) and was found to be >95% complete. The reaction mixture wasdiluted with H₂O (50 mL) and neutralized by the careful addition ofconc. NH₄OH. More CH₂Cl₂ and H₂O were added, the mixture was transferredto a separatory funnel, and the layers allowed to separate. The organicfraction was washed again with H₂O and brine. Combined CH₂Cl₂ extracts(3×) were filtered through Na₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo to give 1.35 gof an amber foam. This crude product was purified twice by flash columnchromatography on silica eluting with 8% acetone in CH₂Cl₂: Appropriatefractions were combined, evaporated in vacuo, chased with ether toobtain 0.81 g of a foam. Treatment with pentane produced a pale yellowpowder. The powder was dried overnight in vacuo at 58° C. to remove alltraces of solvent. Total yield of pure 46 was 491 mg in 37%;m.p.=softens at 104° C. HPLC analysis on Phenomenex Prodigy 5 ODS-2column (150×4.6 mm) eluted with 30% H₂O with 0.03% triethylammoniumphosphate (pH 7.0) in CH₃OH at a flow rate of 1 mL per min at λ=302indicated the product 46 to be 98.76% pure with a retention time (t_(R))of 16.64 min. FTIR (KBR, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 2945, 2890, 1734,1663, 1612, 1562, 1518, 1446, 1368 and 1235 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.43 (s,3H, C18-CH₃), 1.28 (t, 3H, C21-OCH₂ CH₃ , J=6 Hz), 2.15 (s, 3H,C17α-OAc), 2.95 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 3.63 (q, 2H, C21-OCH₂ CH₃, J=6 Hz),4.03-4.60 (m, 3H, C21-CH₂ and C11α-CH), 5.87 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.72 (d,2H, aromatic-CH's, J=9 Hz) and 7.08 (d, 2H, aromatic-CH's, J=9 Hz). MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity): 519 (M⁺, 34), 459 (4.5), 372 (7.4), 134(18) and 121 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₂H₄₁O₅N: C, 73.95; H, 7.96; N,2.70. Found: C, 73.84; H, 8.20; N, 2.65.

Example 11

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α,21-diacetoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione3-oxime as a mixture of syn and anti-isomers (47)

A solution of the diacetate (15, 0.5 g, 0.937 mmol) and hydroxylaminehydrochloride (0.651 g, 937 mmol) in absolute ethanol (25 mL) wasstirred at room temperature under nitrogen. After 2.5 hr, TLC (10%acetone in CH₂Cl₂) indicated a complete reaction. The reaction mixturewas diluted with H₂O (200 mL), adjusted to a pH 7 with saturated NaHCO₃solution, and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions werewashed with H₂O (2×) and brine (1×), combined, dried (Na₂SO₄), filteredand concentrated in vacuo to give 0.56 g of residue as a foam.Purification by flash chromatography (5% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) followed byprecipitation from ether solution with pentane gave 0.3 g of the oxime(4) in 58% as an off-white amorphous powder. Analysis by HPLC on aNovaPak C₁₈ column eluted with CH₃CN:H₂O:Et₃N 45:55:0.033 at a flow rateof 2 mL per min at λ=274 nm indicated approximately 98% purityconsisting of a 32:68 mixture of the syn- and anti-isomers. Analysis byNMR indicated a syn:anti ratio of 43:57: m.p.=sinters at 151° C., andthen decomposes. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 2946, 1737,1612 and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.40 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 3.93 (s, 6H,NMe₂), 4.40 (br. s, 1H, C11α-CH), 4.87 (dd, J=29.7 Hz, J₂=18 Hz, 2H,C21-CH₂OAc), 5.97 (s, 0.57H, C4-CH═ for anti-isomer), 6.63 (s, 0.43H,C4-CH═ for syn-isomer), 6.70 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and7.10 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relativeintensity): 549 ((M+H)⁺, 63) and 275 (100).

Example 12

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-acetoxy-21-methoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione3-oxime as a mixture of syn and anti-isomers (48)

A solution of the 21-methoxy compound (38, 0.1 g, 0.2 mmol) andhydroxylamine hydrochloride (0.139 g, 2 mmol) in absolute ethanol (5 mL)was stirred at room temperature under nitrogen. After 1 hr, TLC (10%acetone in CH₂Cl₂) indicated a complete reaction. The reaction mixturewas diluted with H₂O, adjusted to a pH of 7 with saturated NaHCO₃solution, and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions werewashed with H₂O (2×) and brine (1×), combined, dried over Na₂SO₄filtered and concentrated in vacuo to give the crude product as a foam.This material was combined with 0.12 g additional crude product in aprevious batch and the total amount (0.21 g) was purified by flashchromatography (15% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) followed by trituration with pentaneto give 0.12 g of the oxime (48) in 58% yield as a white amorphouspowder. Analysis by HPLC on a NovaPak C₁₈ column eluted withMeOH:H₂O:Et₃N 65:35:0.0033 at a flow rate of 1 mL/min at λ=276 nmindicated approximately 97% purity of a mixture of the syn- andanti-isomers. The retention times of the two isomers were too closetogether (t_(R)=8.8 and 9.2 min) to give an accurate integration ratio.Analysis by NMR indicated a syn:anti ratio of 26:74; m.p.=sinters at142° C. and melts at 146-162° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max)2938, 1733, 1613 and 1517 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHZ, CDCl₃) δ 0.36 (s, 3H,C18-CH₃), 2.10 (s, 3H, 17α-OAc), 2.89 (s, 6H, NMe₂), 3.41 (s, 3H, OCH₃),4.10 (d, 1H, C21-CH₂, J=16.8 Hz), 4.30 (m, 2H, 11α-H plus 21-CH₂), 5.88(s, 0.74H, C4-CH═ for anti-isomer), 6.53 (s, 0.26H, C4-CH═ forsyn-isomer), 6.62 (d, 2H, 3′,5′ ·aromatic-CH's), J=8.7 (Hz) and 6.99 (d,2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's, J=8.7 Hz). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity):521 (M⁺, 100) and 261 (67).

Example 13

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-formyloxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(69A) (FIG. 4).17α-Hydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(61, 140 mg, 0.323 mmol) was dissolved in 96% formic acid (2.44 g, 50.9mmol) in an argon atmosphere and cooled to 0° C. in an ice bath(Oliveto, E. P., et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 77:3564-3567 (1955)). P₂O₅(500 mg, 1.76 mmol) was added as a solid and after stirring fiveminutes, the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature.After 1.5 hr, saturated NaHCO₃ was added carefully to neutralize themixture. The mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3×) and washed with H₂Oand brine and dried over Na₂SO₄. Another similar reaction was runstarting with 500 mg (1.15 mmol) of the 17α-hydroxy compound (61). Twoproducts from the above two reactions were combined and chromatographedon dry column silica gel using CH₂Cl₂:CH₃C(O)CH₃ (9:1) to afford thecrude product as a yellow foam (69A), which was indicated by HPLC to be97% pure. This material was rechromatographed using the same solventsystem to give 185 mg of the good product (69A) as an amorphousoff-white solid. Analysis by HPLC indicated 98.8% purity. The yield was28%; and m.p.=softens at 115° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max)2941, 1722, 1664, 1611 and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.38 (s, 3H,C18-Me), 2.13 (s, 3H, C21-Me), 2.91 (s, 6H, N(CH₃)₂), 4.44 (d, 1H,C11α-CH), 5.8 (br s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.68 and 7.06 (dd, 4H, aromatic-CH's)and 8.11 (br s, 1H, C17α-HC═O). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 461(M⁺, 36.2), 400 (2.1), 134 (15.4), 121 (100), and 91 (3.0). Anal. Calcd.for C₂₉H₃₅NO₄.¼H₂O: C, 74.73; H, 7.68; N, 3.01. Found: C, 74.64; H,7.65; N, 3.05.

Example 14

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Propionoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(69C) (FIG. 4). Trifluoroacetic anhydride (0.48 g, 4.29 mmol) andpropionic acid (0.61 g, 4.29 mmol) were added to benzene, andp-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (0.186 g, 1.31 mmol) as a solid wasadded to the mixture. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for ½hr. The 17α-hydroxy steroid (61, 581 mg, 1.34 mmol) was dissolved inbenzene and added to the above mixture. The mixture was stirred at roomtemperature for 6 hr. The mixture was poured into ice cold sodium NaHCO₃solution and extracted with EtOAc. The EtOAc extracts were washed withH₂O, brine and dried over Na₂SO₄, and evaporated in vacuo. The productobtained was purified by flash column chromatography using EtOAc:hexane(4:6) as solvent. The product was crystallized from isopropanol to give145 mg of crude 69C as white crystals. In checking this material byreverse phase HPLC, it was found that an impurity was present whichcould not be separated from the desired product by chromatography onsilica gel. The mother liquor was concentrated in vacuo, and the esterwas purified by chromatography on an ODS-3 10/50 Whatman column usingMeOH:H₂O (9:1) as a solvent and monitoring the separation using a WatersModel 481 variable wavelength detector at 365 nm and at a flow rate of 9mL/min. Fractions were collected and similar fractions were combined.Good material from the above two was combined and recrystallized fromisopropanol to give 299 mg of 69C as white crystals in 80% yield;m.p.=125-126° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 2946, 2882,1730, 1662, 1610, 1596 and 1516 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.363 (s, 3H,C18-Me), 2.086 (s, 3H, C21-Me), 2.905 (s, 6H, —NMe₂), 4.386 (d, 1H,C11α-CH), 5.775 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.634 and 6.979 (d, 4H, aromatic-CH's).MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 489 (M⁺, 42.2), 400 (6.5), 372 (6.7),134 (20.2), 121 (100), and 57 (11.7). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₁H₃₉NO₄ ½C₃H₈O:C, 75.14; H, 8.29; N, 2.70. Found: C, 75.03; H, 8.43; N, 2.83.

Example 15

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Heptanoyloxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(69D) (FIG. 4). The above procedure was followed using heptanoicacid-(0.56 g, 4.29 mmol) instead of propionic acid on the 17α-hydroxycompound (61, 581 mg, 1.34 mmol). The reaction was run at roomtemperature for 17 hr. After workup, the crude product was purified byflash chromatography using EtOAc:hexane (4:6). The slightly impureproduct was chromatographed on an ODS-3 10/50 column using CH₃OH at aflow rate of 9 mL per min, monitored at 365 nm. T his afforded 335 mg ofan oil (69D) in 48.5% yield. This oil was solidified on standing at roomtemperature as an off-white solid; m.p.=softens at 68° C. FTIR (KBr,difuse reflectance): v_(max) 2943, 1731, 1664, 1612 and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR(CDCl₃): δ 0.36 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.1 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 2.93 (s, 6H,N(CH₃)₂), 4.44 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.82 (br s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.68 and7.04 (d, 4H, aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 545 (M⁺,37.4), 400 (7.7), 372 (7.4), 134 (18.6) and 121 (100). Anal. Calcd. forC₃₅H₄₇NO₄.½ H₂O: C, 75.81; H, 8.66; N, 2.53. Found: C, 75.89; H, 8.55;N, 2.71.

Example 16

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Methoxymethyl-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(91) (FIG. 5).

Step 1. 3-Methoxy-19-norpregna-1,3,5(10),17(20)-tetraene (78)

Sodium hydride (50% in mineral oil, 14.72 g, 306.6 mmol) was weighedinto a dry 3-neck flask and the oil was removed by washing with drypentane (3×). The residual pentane was removed under a stream ofnitrogen. DMSO (255 mL) freshly distilled from CaH₂ was added. Themixture was stirred and heated at 60-65° C. until gas evolution hadceased and the mixture was homogeneous. The dimsyl anion solution wascooled to room temperature and a solution of ethyl triphenylphosphoniumiodide (135.0 g, 306.6 mmol) in DMSO (510 mL) was added to give abrick-red solution of the ylide. A solution of estrone methyl ether (77,19.5 g, 68.6 mmol) in benzene (freshly distilled from sodium, 390 mL)was added to the DMSO solution and the mixture was stirred at 60° C. for18 hr. The solution was cooled to room temperature and poured intoice/water (1000 mL). The aqueous mixture was extracted with hexanes(3×). The hexane extracts were washed with H₂O (3×) and brine (1×). Thecombined hexane extracts were dried over Na₂SO₄ and evaporation of thesolvent gave 19.17 g of an oily material. This material was dissolved inpetroleum ether and percolated through a column of neutral alumina.Evaporation of the solvent gave a solid (78). The material wascrystallized from methanol/ether to afford 10.95 g of 78 in 54% yield asa white crystalline solid; m.p.=70-75° C. (Lit m.p.=76.5-77.5° C.:Kribner, et al., J. Org. Chem., 31:24-26 (1966)). Elution of the aluminacolumn with EtOAc allowed for the recovery of 8.0 g of 77. NMR (CDCl₃):δ 0.9 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.70 (d, J=6 Hz, C21-CH₃), 3.80 (s, 3H,C3-OCH₃), 5.2 (m, 1H, C20-CH═), 6.8 (m, 2H, 2′,4′-aromatic-CH's), and7.27 (d, 1H, J=8 Hz, 1′-aromatic-CH).

Step 2. 3-Methoxy-19-norpregna-1,3,5(10),16-tetraene-20-one (79)

A fine stream of oxygen was bubbled through a solution of the17-ethylidene compound (78, 4.0 g, 13.5 mmol) in pyridine (100 mL)containing hematoporphyrine (80 mg, 1 mol %) for 16 hr while beingilluminated with six 15 watt fluorescent lights. Acetic anhydride (20mL) was added to the pyridine solution and the mixture was stirred for2.5 hr. The mixture was poured into cold H₂O and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3×). The methylene chloride extracts were sequentially washed with 5.0N HCl (3×), H₂O (1×), saturated NaHCO₃ (1×) and brine (1×). The combinedmethylene chloride extracts were dried over Na₂SO₄ and evaporation ofthe solvent gave a black solid. The material was dissolved in hot EtOAc,treated with charcoal, and filtered through Celite. Evaporation of thesolvent gave 4.15 g of a yellow solid. Crystallization of this yellowsolid from EtOAc afforded 2.45 g of 79 in 58.5% yield; m.p.=182-185° C.(Lit m.p.=186-188° C.: Kribner, et al., J. Org. Chem., 34:3502-3505(1969)).

Step 3. 3-Methoxy-19-norpregna-1,3,5(10)-trien-20-one (80)

A solution of the enone (79, 4.0 g, 12.89 mmol) in benzene (160 mL)containing 10% Pd/C (400 mg, 3 mol %) was hydrogenated at atmosphericpressure. The reaction was allowed to stir for 16 hr. The mixture wasfiltered through Celite under nitrogen. Evaporation of the solvent gave3.96 g of the 20-ketone (80) (Kribner, et al., J, Org, Chem.,34:3502-3505 (1969)) as a light yellow solid in 98% yield. NMR (CDCl₃):δ 0.63 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.15 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.80 (s, 3H, C3-OCH₃),6.70 (m, 2H, 2′,4′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.2 (d, 2H, J=8 Hz, 1′aromatic-CH).

Step 4. 3-Methoxy-20-acetoxy-19-norpregna-1,3,5(10),17(20)-tetraene (81)

A mixture of the 20-ketone (80, 3.0 g, 9.60 mmol) and p-toluenesulfonicacid (1.13 g, 5.94 mmol) in acetic anhydride (200 mL) was heated at 150°C. in an oil bath while the solvent was slowly distilled through a shortpath column (Temp. Head=130-134° C.) over 5 hr. The remaining solventwas removed at reduced pressure. The residue was partitioned betweencold ether and cold saturated NaHCO₃ solution. The layers were separatedand the aqueous layer was extracted with Et₂O (2×). The Et₂O layers werewashed with H₂O, brine, combined and dried over sodium sulfate.Evaporation of the solvent gave 3.67 g of the enol acetate (81)(Krubiner, A. M. et al., J. Org. Chem., 34:3502-3505 (1969)), a stableyellow foam. This product was purified via flash chromatography elutingwith 20% EtOAc/hexane to afford 1.78 g of 81 in 52% yield as a mixtureof E and Z isomers. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.87 and 0.92 (s, C18-CH₃), 1.80 (brs, 3H, C21-CH₃), 2.13 (s, 3H, C21-OCOCH₃ ), 6.80 (m, 2H, 2′,4′aromatic-CH's) and 7.20 (d, J=8 Hz, 1H, 1′ aromatic-CH). MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 354 (M⁺), 312, 297(100), 173, 147 and 123.

Step 5. 3-Methoxy-17α-methoxymethyl-19-norpregna-1,3,5(10)-triene-20-one (82)

A solution of the enol-acetate (81, 1.7 g, 4.8 mmol) in ether (70 mL)was added dropwise over ½ hr to a cold (0° C.) ether solution of methyllithium (8.3 mL of a 1.3 M solution, 10.8 mmol). After ½ hr, a sodiumbicarbonate-quenched aliquot showed very little enol-acetate remaining.Bromomethyl methyl ether (7.2 mL of a 2.0 M/ether solution, 14.4 mmol)was added to the above lithium enolate solution. The mixture was stirredat 0° C. for ½ hr, then allowed to warm to room temperature over 1 hr.The mixture was poured into ice/water and extracted with Et₂O. The etherlayers were washed with H₂O and brine, combined and dried over anhydrousNa₂SO₄. Evaporation of the solvent gave 1.78 g of 82. The product wasisolated by flash chromatography eluted with 17.5% EtOAc/hexane toafford 600 mg of 82 as a yellow foam in 35% yield. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃):δ 0.672 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.171 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.310 (s, 3H,17α-CH₂OCH₃ ), 3.40 and 3.90 (d, 2H, J=8.4 Hz, 17α-OCH₂ CH₃), 3.761 (s,3H, C3-OCH₃), 6.82 (m, 2H, 2′,4′ aromatic-CH's), and 7.20 (d, 1H, J=8Hz, 1′ aromatic-CH). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 356 (M⁺), 227(100), 173, 147 and 115.

Step 6. 3-Methoxy-17α-methoxymethyl-19-norpregna-1,3,5(1)-trien-20-ol(83)

A solution of the 20 ketone (82, 600 mg, 1.68 mmol) in THF/EtOH wastreated with NaBH₄ (135 mg, 3.5 mmol) dissolved in cold H₂O (3 mL). Themixture was stirred at 50° C. for 5 hr. The mixture was chilled in anice bath and excess NaBH₄ was destroyed with the cautious addition ofacetic acid. The mixture was diluted with H₂O and extracted with CH₂Cl₂.The CH₂Cl₂ extracts were washed with H₂O and brine, combined and driedover Na₂SO₄. Evaporation of the solvent gave 580 mg of 83 as a mixtureof 20α- (minor) and 20β- (major) epimers as a light yellow oil. Flashchromatography eluting with 2% acetone/CH₂Cl₂ of a small sample allowedfor the isolation of the 20α-epimer with R_(f)=0.35 and the 20β-epimerwith R_(f)=0.50. Their assignments were based on 300 MHz NMR analysis.NMR (CDCl₃) for 20α-OH: δ 0.797 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.254 (d, 3H, J=6.3Hz, C21-CH₃), 3.376 (s, 3H, C17α-CH₂OCH₃), 3.435 and 3.875 (d, 2H, J=8.7Hz, C17α-CH₂ OCH₃), 3.769 (s, 3H, C3-OCH₃), 6.85 (m, 2H, 2′,4′aromatic-CH's), and 7.165 (d, 1H, J=8.4 Hz, 1′ aromatic-CH). NMR (CDCl₃)for 203-OH: δ 0.998 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.218 (d, 3H, J=6.3 Hz, C21-CH₃),3.311 (s, 3H, C17α-CH₂OCH₃ ), 3.371 and 3.612 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz, C17α-CH₂OCH₃), 3.755 (s, 3H, C3-OCH₃), 6.85 (m, 2H, 2′,4′ aromatic-CH's) 7.165(d, 1H, J=8.4 Hz, 1′ aromatic-CH). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 358(M⁺), 282, 227, 174 (100) and 147.

Step 7. 3-Methoxy-17α-methoxymethyl-19-norpregna-2,5(10)-dien-20-ol (84)

A solution of the 20-alcohol (83, 760 mg, 2.12 mmol) in THF/t-BuOH (1:1,50 mL) was added to redistilled ammonia (50 mL). While stirringvigorously, lithium metal (294 mg, 42.2 mmol), cut into small pieces,was added. Within 2 min, the mixture turned blue and was stirred atammonia reflux (−35° C.) for 5 hr. The reaction was quenched through theaddition of methanol (15 mL). The ammonia was evaporated under a streamof nitrogen. The residue was diluted with H₂O and extracted with CH₂Cl₂.The CH₂Cl₂ extracts were washed with H₂O and brine, combined and driedover Na₂SO₄. Evaporation of the solvent gave 874 mg of 84 (14.4% overtheoretical yield) as a stable yellow foam. This 1,4-dihydro derivative(84) was used without further purification in the next reaction. NMR(CDCl₃): δ 1.0 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.20 (d, 3H, J=6.3 Hz, C21-CH₃), 3.3(s, 3H, C17α-CH₂OCH₃ ), 3.56 (s, 3H, C3-OCH₃) and 4.67 (br, m, 1H,C2-CH═). FTIR (KBr, duffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 1666 and 1694 cm⁻¹.

Step 8. 17α-Methoxymethyl-19-norpregna-5(10)-en-3-on-20-ol (85)

A solution of the 1,4-dihydro derivative (84, 710 mg, 1.97 mmol) inacetic acid, THF, H₂O (3:1:1, 50 mL) was stirred at 40-45° C. Within 45minutes, TLC analysis indicated complete consumption of the startingmaterial. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was taken upin H₂O and the aqueous mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂. The CH₂Cl₂extracts were washed with H₂O and brine, combined and dried over Na₂SO₄.Evaporation of the solvent afforded 684 mg of 85 in 96% yield as astable light yellow foam. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 1.0 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.21 (d,3H, J=6.3 Hz, C21-CH₃), 3.31 (s, 3H, C17α-CH₂OCH₃ ), 3.35 and 3.72 (d,2H, J=8.4 Hz, C17α-CH₂ OCH₃).

Step 9. 17α-Methoxymethyl-19-norpregna-4,9-dien-3-on-20-ol (86)

A solution of 85 (584 mg, 1.69 mmol) in pyridine (2.5 mL) was added to apyridine (5.2 mL) solution of pyridinium bromide perbromide (594 mg,1.86 mmol) preheated to 80° C. The mixture was heated at 80-90° C. for 1hr. The mixture was poured into cold 2.5 N HCl (50 mL). The aqueousmixture was extracted with EtOAc.

The EtOAc extracts were washed with 2.5 N HCl (50 mL), saturated NaHCO₃solution and brine. The combined EtOAc extracts were dried over Na₂SO₄.Evaporation of the solvent gave 540 mg of 86 as a yellow foam in 92.2%yield. The material was used without further purification in thefollowing reaction. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 3.33 (s, 3H, C17α-CH₂OCH₃), 5.67 (brs, 1H, C4-CH═).

Step 10. 17α-Methoxymethyl-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (87)

A solution of the mixture of 20α and 20β-ol (86, 540 mg, 1.57 mmol) inacetone (15 mL) was chilled in an ice bath and treated dropwise withJones reagent until the orange color of Cr^(VI) persisted. The mixturewas stirred at 0° C. for 10 min, then the excess Cr^(VI) was destroyedwith the addition of 2-propanol until the green color of Cr^(IV)persisted. The mixture was diluted with H₂O and the aqueous mixture wasextracted with EtOAc. The EtOAc extracts were washed with H₂O and brine,combined and dried over Na₂SO₄. Evaporation of the solvent gave 540 mgof a stable foam. Flash chromatography, eluting with 5% acetone/CH₂Cl₂,gave 202 mg of the 3,20-diketone (87) in 37.6% yield as a stable yellowfoam. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.83 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.19 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.30(s, 3H, C17α-CH₂OCH₃ ), 3.36 and 3.85 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz, C17α-CH₂ OCH₃),and 5.72 (br s, 1H, C4-CH═). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max)1703, 1662 and 1605 cm⁻¹.

Step 11.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-17α-methoxymethyl-19-norpregna-5(10),9(11)-dien-20-one(88)

A solution of the 3,20-diketone (87, 202 mg, 0.59 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (16mL) was treated with triethyl-orthoformate (123 μL, 0.74 mmol), ethyleneglycol (81.4 μL, 1.46 mmol) and p-toluenesulfonic acid (ca. 1.0 mg). Themixture was stirred for ½ hr, chilled in an ice bath, and diluted withsaturated NaHCO₃. The aqueous mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂. TheCH₂Cl₂ extracts were washed with H₂O and brine, combined, and dried overNa₂SO₄. Evaporation of the solvent gave 219 mg of the ketal (88) as ayellow foam in 96% yield. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.63 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.17 (s,3H, C21-CH₃), 3.30 (s, 3H, C17α-CH₂OCH₃ ), 3.37 and 3.82 (d, 2H, J=8.7Hz, C17α-CH₂ OCH₃), 4.0 (s, 4H, C3-OCH₂CH₂O—), and 5.57 (br m, 1H,C11-CH═).

Step 12.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α,10α-epoxy-17α-methoxymethyl-19-norpregna-9(11)-en-20-one(89)

A mixture of hexafluoroacetone trihydrate (148.44 mg, 0.67 mmol), 30%hydrogen peroxide (76 μL, 0.67 mmol) and disodium hydrogen phosphate(52.5 mg, 0.37 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (2.0 mL) was stirred at 0° C. for ½ hr. Asolution of the ketal (88, 200 mg, 0.52 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ was added to theabove mixture and the mixture was stirred at 4° C. for 18 hr. Themixture was diluted with a 10% sodium sulfite solution and was extractedwith CH₂Cl₂. The CH₂Cl₂ extracts were washed with H₂O and brine,combined and dried over Na₂SO₄. Evaporation of the solvent gave 200 mgof the epoxide (89) as a mixture of 5α,10α- and 5β,10β-epoxides as ayellow foam in 95.5% yield. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.67 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.17(s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.33 (s, 3H, C17α-CH₂OCH₃), 3.94 (br s, 4H, C3-OCH₂—CH₂ O—), 5.85 (br m, C11-CH═ of 5β-10β-epoxide), and 6.05 (br m,C11-CH═ of 5α,10α-epoxide).

Step 13.3-Ethylenedioxy-5α-hydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-17α-methoxymethyl-19-norpregn-9-en-20-one(90)

Magnesium (604.6 mg, 24.88 mmol) was added to an oven-dried flask whilehot. Under an atmosphere of nitrogen, a single crystal of iodine wasadded and the magnesium was agitated to evenly coat the magnesium. Aftercooling to room temperature, one drop of dibromoethane was added,followed by the addition of THF (10 mL). While the mixture was rapidlystirred, a solution of 4-bromo-N,N-dimethylaniline (2.1 g, 10.5 mmol) inTHF (10 mL) was added slowly. During the addition, the mixture waswarmed to 50-60° C. Within 15 min, the iodine color quenched and themixture maintained reflux without external heating. The reaction mixturewas stirred for 1½ hr and allowed to cool to room temperature. Copper(I) chloride (249.5 mg, 2.52 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirredfor hr. From the above mixture, 2.0 mL (1.0 mmol, 2 eq.) was removed viasyringe and placed into a dry flask. A solution of the epoxide (89, 200mg, 0.5 mmol) was added to the Grignard reagent prepared above. After ½hr stirring, TLC analysis using a solvent system of 5% acetone/CH₂Cl₂indicated the reaction was incomplete. Therefore, 2.0 mL additionalGrignard reagent was added. Within hr, TLC indicated completeconsumption of the starting material. The reaction mixture was dilutedwith saturated NH₄Cl solution and the mixture was stirred for ½ hr whileair was bubbled through the mixture. The aqueous mixture was extractedwith CH₂Cl₂. The CH₂Cl₂ extracts were washed with saturated NH₄Clsolution, H₂O and brine. The combined CH₂Cl₂ extracts were dried overNa₂SO₄. Evaporation of the solvent gave 350 mg of the crude product.Following chromatography, 126 mg of 90 was obtained as a stable yellowfoam in 48% yield NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.28 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.10 (s, 3H,C21-CH₃), 2.87 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 3.27 (s, 3H, C17α-CH₂OCH₃ ), 3.90 (brm, 4H, C3-OCH₂ —CH₂ O—), 4.25 (br m, 1H, C11α-CH), 6.61 and 7.05 (d, 4H,J=9 Hz, aromatic-CH's).

Step 14. Preparation of the Target Compound 91

A solution of 90 (126 mg, 0.24 mmol) in acetic acid/THF/H₂O (3:1:1, 5.0mL) was heated at reflux for 1 hr. The solvent was removed in vacuo andthe residue was diluted with saturated NaHCO₃ solution. The aqueousmixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂. The CH₂Cl₂ extracts were washed withH₂O and brine, combined, and dried over Na₂SO₄. Evaporation of thesolvent gave 111 mg of a stable foam. Flash chromatography eluted with7% acetone/CH₂Cl₂ gave 75 mg of 91 in 68% yield as a stable foam. Thematerial resisted crystallization from a variety of solvents and HPLCanalysis on NovaPak C₁₈ column, eluted with 30% aq. MeOH with 0.033% TEAat a flow rate of 1.0 ml per min at λ=302 nm showed this material to beonly 95% pure. Therefore, this material was purified via preparativeHPLC on Nova Pak C₁₈ column (40×100 mm RCM) eluted with 30% aq. MeOHwith 0.033% TEA at a flow rate of 1.0 mL per min and at λ=330 nm toafford 47 mg of 91 as a stable off-white foam with a purity of 98.8%;m.p.=softens at 110° C. and melts at 115-117° C. FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance) ν_(max) 2940, 2074, 1868, 1704, 1663, 1612, 1560 and 1518cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.356 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.148 (s, 3H,C21-CH₃), 2.905 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 3.300 (s, 3H, C17α-CH₂OCH₃), 3.339and 3.858 (d, 2H, J=8.1 Hz, C17α-CH₂ OCH₃), 4.335 (d, 1H, J=6.3 Hz,C11α-CH), 5.758 (s, 1H, C4-CH═) and 6.638 & 6.992 (d, 4H, J=8.4 Hz,aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 461 (M⁺, 36.6), 134(25.4) and 121 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₀H₃₉NO₃: C, 78.05; H, 8.52; N,3.03. Found: C, 77.29; H, 8.40; N, 2.97.

Example 17

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Acetoxy-11β-[4-(N-pyrrolidino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(70) (FIG. 4).

Step 1.3,20-bis-Ethylenedioxy-17α-hydroxy-19-norpregna-5(10),9(11)-diene (50)

A mixture of 17α-hydroxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (92, 10 g,31.8 mmol), ethylene glycol (11.10 g, 178.7 mmol), freshly distilledtriethyl orthoformate (14 g, 94.1 mmol) and toluenesulfonic acidmonohydrate (0.3 g, 1.58 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (150 mL) was stirred at roomtemperature under nitrogen overnight. Analysis by TLC (5% acetone inCH₂Cl₂) at that time indicated a complete reaction. Solid NaHCO₃ (˜1 g)was added and the mixture was diluted with CH₂Cl₂ (˜100 mL) and pouredinto H₂O. The mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organicfractions were washed with H₂O (3×), filtered through sodium sulfate,combined and concentrated in vacuo to give 12 g of the crude product 50as a yellow foam. Crystallization of this crude material fromCH₂Cl₂/MeOH containing a trace of pyridine gave 9.8 g of the purediketal 50 as a light yellow solid in 77% yield; m.p. 169-171° C. FTIR(KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3484 and 2912 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz,CDCl₃): δ 0.792 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.378 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.816 and4.047 (m, 4H, C20-ketal), 3.983 (s, 4H, C3-ketal) and 5.555 (m, 1H,C11-CH═). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 402 (M⁺, 100.0), 366 (2.5),340 (20.8) 270 (59.9) and 99 (50.1).

Step 2.3,20-bis-Ethylenedioxy-17α-hydroxy-5α,10α-epoxy-19-norpregna-9(11)-ene(51)

Hydrogen peroxide (30%, 3.3 mL, 32.31 mmol) was added to a solution ofhexafluoroacetone trihydrate (3.34 g, 16.17 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (53 mL)cooled to 0° C. Solid Na₂HPO₄ (1.48 g, 10.43 mmol) was added and themixture stirred at 0° C. for ½ hr. A solution of the 3,20-diketal (50,6.0 g, 14.9 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (45 mL), precooled to 0° C., was added overa period of 10 min and the reaction mixture was stirred overnight at 5°C. Analysis by TLC (5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) at that point indicatedabsence of the starting material. The reaction mixture was diluted withCH₂Cl₂ (˜100 mL) and washed with 10% Na₂SO₃ solution (2×) and saturatedNaHCO₃ solution (2×). The organic fractions were filtered throughNa₂SO₄, combined and concentrated in vacuo to give 7 g of 51 of a whitefoam. Trituration of the epoxide mixture (α and β) with ether afforded3.05 g of the pure 5α,10α-epoxide 51 as a white solid in 48.9% yield;m.p.=172-173° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3439, 2950,1705, 1642 and 1593 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 0.789 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃),1.365 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.810-4.094 (m, 8H, C3- and C20-ketals) and6.013 (m, 1H, C11-CH═). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 418 (M⁺, 0.5),400 (1.4), 293 (0.9), 131 (2.5), 99 (4.3) and 87 (100.00).

Step 3.3,20-bis-Ethylenedioxy-5α,17α-dihydroxy-11β-[4-(N-pyrrolinino)phenyl]-19-norpregn-9-ene(53)

Magnesium (0.98 g, 40.31 mmol) was added to a 250 mL, 3-neck flask witha magnetic stirrer and a reflux condenser. A crystal of iodine wasadded, followed by dry THF (20 mL) and a few drops of 1,2-dibromoethane.A solution of N-(4-bromophenyl)pyrrolidine (Yur'e v Y K et al., IzvestAkad Nauk S. S. S. R., Otdel Khim Nauk, 166-171 (1951): CA, 45:10236f(1951)) (8.3 g., 36.71 mmol) in dry THF was then added and the mixturewas stirred under nitrogen and heated to reflux. After heating for 45min, most of the magnesium had reacted. The reaction was cooled to roomtemperature and solid copper (I) chloride (0.36 g, 3.62 mmol) was addedfollowed ½ hr later by a solution of the 5α,10α-epoxide (51, 3.05 g,7.29 mmol) in dry THF (20 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at roomtemperature for 1 hr, then cooled to 0° C. in an ice bath and quenchedby the addition of saturated NH₄Cl (˜15 mL). With vigorous stirring, airwas drawn through the reaction mixture for ½ hr to oxidize Cu(I) toCu(II). The mixture was diluted with H₂O (˜100 mL) and extracted withCH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions were washed with H₂O (3×), combined,dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered and concentrated in vacuo to give 8.36 g ofresidue. Trituration of this material with pentane followed by decantingthe mother liquors removed the phenylpyrrolidine by-product. Triturationof 4 g of the residue with ether gave the Grignard adduct (53, 3.66 g)as blue-grey solid in 88.8% yield. A small amount of this material waspurified by flash chromatography using 10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂ followed bycrystallization from CH₂Cl₂/ether for purposes of characterization:m.p.=251-254° C. (dec.). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3580,3537, 2948, 2871, 2822, 1614 and 1517 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.484 (s, 3H,C18-CH₃), 1.383 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 1.977 (m, 4H, pyrrolidine β-CH₂),3.245 (m, 4H, pyrrolidine α-CH₂), 3.765-4.038 (m, 8H, C3-ketal andC20-ketal), 4.186 (d, 1H, J=6.3 Hz, C11α-CH), 6.461 (d, 2H, J=8.4 Hz,3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 7.047 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity): 565 (M⁺, 23.2), 547 (20.5), 160 (14.2),147 (61.5) and 87 (100.00). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₄H₄₇NO₆. 1/10H₂O: C,71.75; H, 8.38; N, 2.47. Found: C, 71.98; H, 8.47; N, 2.52.

Step 4.17α-Hydroxy-11β-[4-(N-pyrrolidino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(62)

A suspension of the Grignard adduct (53, 3.45 g, 6.1 mmol) in EtOH (110mL) was deoxygenated by bubbling nitrogen through it for ˜½ hr. Asimilarly deoxygenated 8.5% H₂SO₄ solution (11 mL, 17.53 mmol) was addedand the resulting clear solution was heated to reflux under nitrogen.After 25 min., TLC (20% acetone/CH₂Cl₂; overspotted with concentratedNH₄OH) indicated a complete reaction. The reaction mixture was cooled to0° C. in an ice bath, diluted with H₂O (˜100 mL) and adjusted to a pH of˜8.0 using concentrated NH₄OH solution.

The resulting suspension was extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organicfractions were washed with H₂O (2×), filtered through Na₂SO₄, combinedand concentrated in vacuo to give 2.53 g of crude product which waspurified by flash chromatography (10% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) followed bytrituration with ether to give 2.24 g of the pure 17α-hydroxy derivative(62) as an off-white solid in 80% yield; m.p.=softens at 130° C. FTIR(KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3457, 2946, 2892, 2834, 1706, 1662,1616 and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.490 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.978 (m, 4H,pyrrolidine β-CH₂'s), 2.254 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.243 (m, 4H, pyrrolidineα-CH₂'s), 4.361 (d, 1H, J=6.9 Hz, C11α-CH), 5.752 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.465(d, 2H, J=8.4 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's), and 6.93 (d, 2H, J=8.4 Hz, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 459 (M⁺, 45.5), 160(10.8), 147 (100.0) and 91 (3.5). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₀H₃₇NO₃.⅖H₂O: C,77.19; H, 8.16; N, 3.00. Found: C, 77.27; H, 8.15; N, 3.12.

Step 5 Preparation of the Target Compound 70

Under nitrogen, trifluoroacetic anhydride (19.37 g, 92.22 mmol), glacialacetic acid (5.67 g, 94.42 mmol) and dry CH₂Cl₂ (10 mL) were combinedand stirred at room temperature for 1 hr. Toluenesulfonic acidmonohydrate (0.9 g, 4.73 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (30 mL) was added and themixture cooled to 0° C. in an ice bath. A solution of the 17α-hydroxycompound (2, 2.12 g, 4.61 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (5 mL) was added and thereaction mixture was stirred at 0° C. and monitored by TLC (20%acetone/CH₂Cl₂, overspotted with concentrated NH₄OH) which indicated acomplete reaction after 1 hr. The mixture was diluted with H₂O (˜10 mL),stirred at 0° C. for another 15 min, then carefully adjusted to a pH of˜8 using pH paper with dropwise addition of concentrated NH₄OH solution(˜16 mL). The mixture was diluted with H₂O (˜200 mL) and extracted withCH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions were washed with H₂O (3×), filteredthrough sodium sulfate, combined and concentrated in vacuo to give 2.3 gof crude product as a yellow foam. This material was purified by flashchromatography (5% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) followed by crystallization from 90%EtOH to give 1.87 g of the pure 17α-acetate as a light yellow solid in80.7% yield; m.p.=149-154° C. Reverse phase HPLC on Waters NovaPak C₁₈column eluted with 0.05 M KH₂PO₄ buffer [pH=3.0]/CH₃CN, (40:60) at aflow rate of 1 mL/min and at λ=302 nm indicated this material to be >99%pure with a retention time (t_(R)) of 8.98 min. FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance) ν_(max) 2946, 2880, 1734, 1715, 1665, 1614 and 1518 cm⁻¹.NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.376 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.978 (m, 4H, pyrrolidine(3-CH₂'s), 2.091 (s, 3H, C17α-OAc), 2.132 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.241 (m,4H, pyrrolidine α-CH₂'s), 4.386 (d, 1H, J=7.2 Hz, C11α-CH), 5.771 (s,1H, C4-CH═), 6.465 (d, 2H, J=8.4 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.030 (d,2H, J=8.4 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity):501 (M⁺, 33.80), 426 (2.3), 160 (10.7) and 147 (100.0). Anal. Calcd. forC₃₂H₃₉NO₄.¾H₂O: C, 74.61; H, 7.92; N, 2.72. Found: C, 74.58; H, 7.69; N,2.87.

Example 18

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Acetoxy-11β-[4-(N-Piperidino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(71) (FIG. 4).

Step 1.3,20-bis-Ethylenedioxy-5α,17α-dihydroxy-11β-[4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-19-norpregn-9-ene(54)

Magnesium (1.74 g, 71.7 mmoll) was weighed into a 250 mL round bottomtwo-neck flask equipped with a reflux condenser, a magnetic stirring barand a rubber septum. A small crystal of iodine was added and the systemwas flushed with dry nitrogen. The system plus contents were flame driedunder nitrogen. The system was cooled to room temperature and freshlydistilled THF (60 mL) was added via syringe. A small amount (˜0.1 mL) ofdry dibromoethane was added and the mixture stirred at room temperature.After evidence of reaction was observed (disappearnance of I₂, color,bubble formation on the surface of magnesium), a solution ofN-(4-bromophenyl)piperidine (Wolfe, J. P. and Buchwald, S. L., J. Org.Chem., 62:6066-6068 (1997); and Veradro, G. et al., Synthesis, 447-450(1991)) (17.21 g, 71.7 mmol) in dry THF (40 mL) was added via syringe.The mixture was then stirred in a hot water bath for 3.5 hr, after whichtime the majority of the magnesium metal had reacted. The mixture wascooled to room temperature and copper (I) chloride (710 mg, 7.17 mmol)was added as a solid, and the mixture was then stirred in a hot waterbath for 3.5 hr, after which time the majority of the magnesium metalhad reacted. The mixture was cooled to room temperature and copper (I)chloride (710 mg, 7.17 mmol) was added as a solid and the mixturestirred at room temperature for ½ hr. The 5α,10α-epoxide 51, 6.0 g, 14.3mmol) in dry THF (40 mL) was added via syringe and the mixture stirredat room temperature for ½ hr. At this time, a small aliquot of thereaction mixture was withdrawn, quenched with saturated NH₄Cl solution,and extracted with a small amount of EtOAc. A TLC (10% acetone inCH₂Cl₂) of the organic layer indicated the absence of the startingmaterial. Saturated NH₄Cl solution (˜100 mL) was added to the reactionmixture, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for ½ hr whileair was drawn through the reaction mixture (to oxidize copper) via a 6inch needle inserted through the rubber septum by applying a partialvacuum to the top of the condenser. The contents of the flask wasdiluted with H₂O (˜250 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organicfractions were washed with saturated NH₄Cl solution (1×), H₂O (1×),brine (1×) and then dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄. The organic fractionwas filtered and concentrated in vacuo to yield 26.8 g of an oil. Thematerial was placed on a flash column and eluted and using 10% acetonein CH₂Cl₂ yielding 5.25 g of 54 as an off-white solid in 63.87% yield;m.p.=211-214° C. (sealed tube). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max)3508, 2933, 2790, 1609 1511, 1441, 1365 and 1234 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ0.45 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.38 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.05-3.2 (m, 4H,—N—(CH₂)₂—), 3.8-4.05 (m, 8H, 3- and 20-ketals), 4.1 (d, 1H, C11α-CH)and 6.8-7.1 (dd, 4H, aromatic-CH's). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₅H₄₅O₆N: C,72.51; H, 8.52; N, 2.41. Found: C, 71.84; H, 8.60; N, 2.46. MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 579 (M⁺).

Step 2.17α-Hydroxy-11β-[4-(N-Piperidino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(63)

Nitrogen was bubbled through a mixture of EtOH (120 mL) and H₂SO₄ (8.5%,15 mL) for ½ hr to remove oxygen. The Grignard adduct (54, 4.0 g, 6.89mmol) was added as a solid with stirring. The mixture was put into anoil bath preheated to 95° C. for ½ hr. The mixture was cooled in an icebath and quenched with saturated K₂CO₃ (pH=˜10). The reaction mixturewas diluted with H₂O (250 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). Theorganic fractions were washed with saturated NaHCO₃ (1×), H₂O (1×),brine (1×), combined, dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄ and concentrated invacuo to give 3.35 g of a foam. This material was purified by flashcolumn chromatography using 10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂ to yield 2.95 g of acrude product (63) which was crystallized from CH₂Cl₂ and ether to yield2.45 g of an off-white crystalline product (63) in two crops in 61.4%yield; m.p.=219-221° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3433,2942, 1708, 1654, 1605, 1512 and 1234 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.45 (s, 3H,C18-Me), 2.25 (s, 3H, C21-Me), 3.05-3.2 (m, 4H, —N—(CH₂)₂—), 4.35 (d,1H, C11α-CH), 5.75 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.8-7.0 (dd, 4H, aromatic-CH). MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity): 161 (100), 174 (11.43) and 473 (75.71,M⁺). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₁H₃₉O₃N: C, 78.61; H, 8.30; N, 2.96. Found: C,77.59; H, 8.29; N, 3.03.

Step 3. Preparation of the Target Compound 71

The diketone (63, 1.7 g, 3.59 mmol) was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (50 mL) andcooled to 0° C. in an ice bath. In a separate round bottom flask,trifluoroacetic anhydride (15.11 g, 71.78 mmol) and acetic acid (4.75 g,71.78 mmol) were added to CH₂Cl₂ (100 mL), flushed with dry nitrogen andstirred at room temperature for ½ hr. This mixed anhydride was thenplaced in an ice bath and cooled to 0° C. The cold mixed anhydridesolution was then added to the steroid solution and treated withp-toluenesulfonic acid (628 mg, 3.3 mmol). The reaction mixture wasstirred for ½ hr at 0° C. The reaction was quenched with saturated K₂CO₃(pH=˜10), diluted with H₂O and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organiclayers were washed with H₂O (2×) and brine (1×), dried over Na₂SO₄,filtered and concentrated to yield 3.38 g of crude material. A flashcolumn using 10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂ yielded 1.66 g of 71 as an off-whitesolid in 54.1% yield. The crude product 71 was recrystallized fromCH₂Cl₂ and Et₂O. The material retained CH₂Cl₂ and was dried in a heatingpistol in vacuo over refluxing benzene for 5 days to afford 895 mg of 71as an off-white solid in 48.4% yield; m.p.=175-183° C. (sealed tube).FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 2936, 1733, 1717, 1654, 1609,1512, 1450, 1372, 1259 and 1235 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 0.340 (s,3H, C18-Me), 2.091 (s, 3H, C17-OAc), 2.131 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.120 (m,4H, —N—(CH₂)₂—), 4.370 (m, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.778 (s, 1H, C4-CH═) and6.810-7.000 (m, 4H, aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity):161 (100), 174 (11.11) and 515 (M⁺, 59.72).

Reverse-phase HPLC analysis on Waters NovaPak C₈S column eluted withMeOH:H₂O in the ratio of 70:30 with 0.05% TEA at a flow rate of 1 mL/minand at 260 nm indicated it to be 99.5% pure. Anal. Calcd. forC₃₁H₄₁O₄N.½EtOH: C, 76.86; H, 8.01; N, 2.72. Found: C, 76.64; H, 8.06;N, 2.69.

Example 19

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Acetoxy-11β-[4-(N-Morpholino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(72) (FIG. 4)

Step 1.3,20-bis-Ethylenedioxy-5α,17α-dihydroxy-11β-[4-(N-morpholino)phenyl]-19-norpregn-9-ene(55)

Magnesium (0.90 g, 37.02 mmol) was added to a 250 mL 3-neck flaskequipped with a magnetic stirrer and a reflux condenser. A crystal ofiodine was added followed by dry THF (20 mL) and a few drops of1,2-dibromoethatne. A solution of N-(4-bromophenyl)morpholine (Jones, D.H., J. Chem. Soc. (C), 132-137 (1971)) (7.8 g, 32.21 mmol) in dry THF(30 mL) was then added and the mixture was stirred under nitrogen andheated to reflux. After 45 min of stirring, most of the magensium hadreacted. The reaction was cooled to room temperature, and solid copper(I) chloride (0.32 g, 32.3 mmol) was added followed ½ hr later by asolution of the 5α,10α-epoxide (51, 2.7 g, 6.45 mmol) in dry THF (20mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 hr, thencooled to 0° C. in an ice bath and quenched by the addition of saturatedNH₄Cl solution (˜10 mL). With vigorous stirring, air was drawn throughthe reaction mixture for hr to oxidize Cu(I) to Cu(II). The mixture wasextracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×) and the organic fractions washed with H₂O(3×). The organic fractions were combined, dried over sodium sulfate,filtered and concentrated in vacuo to give 8 g of residue. Triturationof this material with ether gave the pure adduct (55, 2.1 g) as anoff-white solid. The mother liquors were concentrated in vacuo and theresidue purified by flash chromatography (20% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) to give anadditional 0.6 g of the product (55). Total yield of 55 was 2.7 g in 72%yield; m.p.=243-245° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3578,3539, 2978, 2949, 2887, 2868, 2821, 1610 and 1511 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ0.450 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.377 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.110 (m, 4H,morpholine-O—CH₂ CH₂ N)—), 3.789-4.039 (m, 10H, C3-ketal, C20-ketal andmorpholine —O—CH₂ CH₂N), 4.202 (d, 1H, J=6.9 Hz, C11α-CH), 6.791 (d, 2H,J=8.7, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.107 (d, 2H, J=2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity): 581 (M⁺, 11.0), 563 (8.6), 366 (2.5), 163(18.5) and 87 (100.0). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₄H₄₇NO₇.⅔H₂O: C, 68.79; H,8.20; N, 2.36. Found: C, 68.84; H, 8.01; N, 2.36.

Step 2.17α-Hydroxy-11β-[4-(N-morpholino)phenyl]-19-norprena-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(64)

A suspension of the Grignard adduct (55, 2.56 g, 4.4 mmol) in EtOH (80mL) was deoxygenated by bubbling nitrogen through it for ˜½ hr. Asimilarly deoxygenated 8.5% H₂SO₄ solution (8 mL, 12.75 mmol) was added,and the resulting clear solution was heated to reflux under nitrogen.After 25 min, TLC (20% acetone/CH₂Cl₂, overspotted with concentratedNH₄OH) indicated a complete reaction. The reaction mixture was cooled to0° C. in an ice bath, diluted with H₂O (˜100 mL) and adjusted to a pH of˜8.0 using concentrated NH₄OH solution. The resulting suspension wasextracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions were washed with H₂O(2×), filtered through Na₂SO₄, combined and concentrated in vacuo togive 2.2 g of a yellow foam. Trituration of this material with ethergave the pure 17α-hydroxy compound (64, 1.8 g) as a white solid in 86%yield; m.p.=218-220° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3426,2950, 2852, 1710, 1652, 1580 and 1511 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.450 (s, 3H,C18-CH3), 2.255 (s, 3H, C21-CH3), 3.115 (m, 4H, morpholine —OCH₂ CH₂N—), 3.843 (m, 4H, morpholine-OCH₂ CH₂N), 4.373 (d, 1H, J=7.2 Hz,C11α-CH), 5.763 (s, 3H, C4-CH═), 6.804 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 7.028 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI)m/z (relative intensity): 475 (M⁺, 58.5), 374 (4.9), 322 (5.4), 176(14.2) and 163 (100.0). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₀H₃₇NO₄. 1/10H₂O: C, 75.47;H, 7.85; N, 2.93. Found: C, 75.46; H, 7.90; N, 3.04.

Step 3. Preparation of the Target Compound 72

Under nitrogen, trifluoroacetic anhydride (14.9 g, 70.94 mmol), glacialacetic acid (4.31 g, 71.7 mmol) and dry CH₂Cl₂ (25 mL) were combined andstirred at room temperature for 1 hr. Toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate(0.7 g, 3.68 mmol) was added and the mixture cooled to 0° C. in an icebath. A solution of the 17α-hydroxy compound (64, 1.66 g, 3.49 mmol) indry CH₂Cl₂ (5 mL) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at 0°C. and monitored by TLC (20% acetone/CH₂Cl₂, overspotted with NH₄OH)which indicated a complete reaction after 1 hr. The mixture wad dilutedwith H₂O (˜10 mL), stirred at 0° C. for another 15 min, then carefullyadjusted to a pH of ˜8 (with pH paper) with dropwise addition ofconcentrated NH₄OH solution (˜16 mL). The mixture was diluted with H₂O(˜200 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions werewashed with water (3×), filtered through Na₂SO₄, combined andconcentrated in vacuo to give 1.8 g of the residue as a yellow foam.This material was purified via flash chromatography (10%acetone/CH₂Cl₂), followed by trituration with ether to afford 1.2 g ofthe pure 17α-acetate (72) as an off-white solid in 67.5% yield. Analysisby NMR indicated this material retained a large amount of ether whichcould be removed by drying in vacuo at 153° C.; m.p.=194-196° C. FTIR(KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 2950, 2885, 1738, 1710, 1663, 1608and 1513 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.342 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.096 (s, 3H,C21-CH₃), 2.132 (s, 3H, C17α-OAc), 3.116 (m, 4H, morpholine-OCH₂ CH₂ N),3.847 (m, 4H, morpholine-OCH₂ CH₂ N), 4.398 (d, 1H, J=6.9 Hz, C11α-CH),5.785 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.810 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and7.030 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relativeintensity): 517 (M⁺, 51.2), 442 (5.1), 414 (6.6), 176 (16.0) and 163(100.0). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₂H₃₉NO₅.½H₂O: C, 74.04; H, 7.60; N, 2.70.Found: C, 74.04; H, 7.60; N, 2.84.

Analysis by HPLC on a Waters NovaPak, C₁₈ eluted with 0.05 M KH₂PO₄buffer, pH=3.0/CH₃CN (55:45) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min and at λ=302 nmindicated this material to be >99% pure with a retention time (t_(R)) of8.7 min.

Example 20

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Acetoxy-11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (73)(FIG. 4).

Step 13,20-bis-Ethylenedioxy-5α,17α-dihydroxy-11β-[4-(2-methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)phenyl]-19-norpregn-9-ene(56)

Magnesium turnings (435 mg, 17.9 mmol) were weighed into a 100 mL roundbottom two-neck flask equipped with a reflux condenser, a magneticstirrer and a rubber septum. A small crystal of iodine was added and thesystem was flushed with dry nitrogen and flame dried. After the systemhad cooled to room temperature, freshly distilled THF (20 mL) wasintroduced via syringe followed by a small amount of dry dibromoethane(˜0.1 mL). After evidence of reaction was observed (disappearance of I₂color, bubble formation on metal), a solution of the ketal of4-bromoacetophenone (see, Detty, M. R., et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc.,105:875-882 (1983); and Rao, P. N., et al., Steroids, 63:523-530 (1998))(4.35 g, 17.9 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) was added via syringe. Themixture was then stirred in a hot water bath for 2 hr. (After 35 min, anadditional 10 mL of THF was added as a white precipitate formed and thereaction mixture thickened). The reaction was cooled to room temperatureand copper (I) chloride (177 mg, 1.79 mmol) was added and the mixutrestirred at room temperature for ½ hr (the precipitate went back intosolution with the addition of the copper chloride). The 5α,10α-epoxide(51, 1.5 g, 3.58 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) was added via syringe and thereaction mixture stirred at room temperature for 45 min. At this time,TLC (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) showed no starting material. Saturated NH₄Clsolution (˜20 mL) was added and the mixture stirred at room temperaturefor ½ hr while air was drawn through the reaction mixture to oxidize thecopper. The contents of the flask were diluted with H₂O (˜100 mL) andextracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions were washed withsaturated NH₄Cl solution (1×), H₂O (1×), and brine (1×), and then driedover anhydrous Na₂SO₄, filtered and concentrated in vacuo to yield anoil. The oil was purified on a flash column (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂)yielding 1.3 g of a stable white foam. The material was crystallizedfrom ether to yield 880 mg of 56 as a white crystalline solid in 42.3%yield; m.p.=185-188° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3501,2940, 1609, 1443, 1371, 1181 and 1042 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.45 (s, 3H,C18-CH₃), 1.4 (s, 3H, CH₃ from ethylene ketal of acetophenone at C11β-),1.6 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.6-4.2 (br m, 12H, C3- and C20-ketals and ketalof acetophenone at C11β-), 4.3 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH), and 7.05-7.47 (dd,4H, aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 582 (M⁺). Anal.Calcd. for C₃₄H₄₆O₈: C, 70.08; H, 7.96. Found: C, 70.00; H, 8.05.

Step 2.17α-Hydroxy-11β-(4-Acetylphenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (65)

Nitrogen was bubbled through a mixture of EtOH (25 mL) and 8.5% H₂SO₄(2.5 mL) for ½ hr to remove oxygen. The Grignard adduct (57, 750 mg,1.28 mmol) was added as a solid with stirring. The mixture was put intoan oil bath preheated to 95° C. for 1 hr. The mixture was cooled in anice bath and quenched with saturated K₂CO₃ to bring the pH to ˜10. Themixture was diluted with H₂O (125 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×).The organic fractions were washed with saturated NaHCO₃ (1×), H₂O (1×),brine (1×), combined and dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄. This material wasconcentrated in vacuo to give 600 mg of 65 as an oil. The material waspurified on a flash column (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) to yield 560 mg of65. This material was crystallized from CH₂Cl₂ and ether to give 475 mgof 65 as a white solid in 85.9% yield; m.p.=foams/honeycombs at 112-115°C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3390, 2976, 1709, 1679, 1655,1601, 1360 and 1275 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.4 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.25 (s,3H, C21-CH₃), 2.6 (s, 3H, 11β-4-phenylacetyl CH₃), 3.25 (s, 1H,C17α-OH), 4.5 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.8 (s, 1H, C4-CH═) and 7.2-8.0 (dd,4H, aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 432 (M⁺, 88.7),414 (11.3), 389 (25.4), 371 (21.1), 346 (100.0), 331 (46.5), 319 (22.5),280 (15.5), 235 (16.9), 200 (14.1), 147 (18.3), 133 (18.3), 115 (12.7),105 (15.5) and 91 (21.1)

Step 3. Preparation of the Target Compound 73

The triketone (65, 375 mg, 0.87 mmol) was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (10 mL)and cooled to 0° C. in an ice bath. In a separate round bottom flask,trifluoroacetic anhydride (3.65 g, 17.3 mmol) and acetic acid (1.14 g,17.3 mmol) were added to CH₂Cl₂ (10 mL), flushed with dry nitrogen andstirred at room temperature for ½ hr. The mixed anhydride was thenplaced in an ice bath and cooled to 0° C. The cold mixed anhydridesolution was then added to the triketone (6) solution and treated withp-toluenesulfonic acid (152 mg, 0.79 mmol). The reaction mixture wasstirred for 45 min at 0° C. The reaction was quenched with saturatedK₂CO₃ (pH=10), diluted with H₂O and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). Theorganic layers were combined, washed with H₂O (2×), brine (1×), driedover sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated to yield 425 mg of crude73. The crude product 73 was purified on a flash column (10% acetone inCH₂Cl₂) to yield 340 mg of compound 73. Crystallization from CH₂Cl₂ andether afforded 305 mg of 73 as a white solid in 73.96% yield;m.p.=243-246° C.

Analysis by reverse phase HPLC on a Waters Nova Pak C₁₈ column elutedwith MeOH:H₂O in the ratio of 70:30 at a flow rate of 1 mL/min and atλ=260 nm indicated it to be 99.6% pure. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance)ν_(max) 2791, 1729, 1712, 1681, 1595, 1362, and 1257 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ0.3 (s, 3H, C18-Me), 2.10 (s, 3H, C17α-OAc), 2.15 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 2.55(s, 3H, 11β-4-phenylacetyl CH₃), 4.5 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.8 (s, 1H,C4-CH═) and 7.2-8.0 (dd, 4H, aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relativeintensity): 474 (M⁺, 2.8), 414 (36.6), 399 (14.0), 389 (8.5) and 371(100). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₀H₃₄O₅ ½/Et₂O: C, 74.85; H, 7.44. Found: C,74.94; H, 7.19.

Example 21

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Acetoxy-11β-(4-methylthiophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(74) (FIG. 4).

Step 1.3,20-bis-(Ethylenedioxy)-5α,17α-dihydroxy-11β-(4-methylthiophenyl)-19-norpregn-9-ene(57)

Magnesium (290 mg, 11.9 mmol) was weighed into a 100 mL round bottomtwo-necked flask equipped with a reflux condenser, a magnetic stirrerand a rubber septum. A small crystal of iodine was added and the systemwas flushed with dry nitrogen. The system plus contents were flame driedunder nitrogen. The system was cooled to room temperature and freshlydistilled THF (20 mL) was added via syringe. A small amount (˜0.1 mL) ofdry dibromoethane was added and the mixture stirred at room temperature.After evidence of reaction was observed (disappearance of I₂ color,bubble formation on the surface of magnesium), a solution of4-bromothioanisole (available from Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee,Wis.)) (2.43 g, 11.9 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) was added via syringe. Themixture was then stirred in a hot water bath for 1.5 hr, after whichtime the majority of the magnesium metal had reacted. The mixture wascooled to room temperature and copper (I) chloride (118 mg, 1.19 mmol)was added as a solid and the mixture stirred at room temperature for ½hr. The 5α,10α-epoxide 51, 1.0 g, 2.38 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) wasadded via syringe and the mixture stirred at room temperature for 1 hr.At this time, a small aliquot of the reaction mixture was withdrawn,quenched with saturated NH₄Cl solution, and extracted with a smallamount of EtOAc. A TLC (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) of the organic layerindicated absence of starting material. Saturated NH₄Cl solution (20 mL)was added to the reaction mixture and the mixture was stirred at roomtemperature for ½ hr while air was drawn through the reaction mixture(to oxidize copper) via a 6-inch needle inserted through the rubberseptum by applying a partial vacuum to the top of the condenser. Thecontents of the flask were diluted with H₂O (˜100 mL) and extracted withCH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions were washed with saturated NH₄Clsolution (1×), H₂O (1×), brine (1×), then dried over anhydrous sodiumsulfate. The organic fractions was filtered and concentrated in vacuo toyield 5.75 g of 57 as an oil. This oil was placed on a flash column andeluted with 10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂ yielding 850 mg of 57 as a whitestable foam. The foam was crystallized from ether to yield 675 mg of 57as a white solid; m.p.=158-159° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance)ν_(max) 3571, 3539, 2944, 1490, 1447, 1190 and 1076 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ0.45 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.36 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 2.45 (s, 3H,C11β-4-CH₃S-phenyl), 3.8-4.1 (br m, 8H, C3- and C20-ketals), 4.25 (br d,1H, C11α-CH) and 7.17 (s, 4H, aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relativeintensity): 542 (M⁺). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₁H₄₂O₆S: C, 68.60; H, 7.80; S,5.91. Found: C, 68.52; H, 7.76; S, 5.84.

Step 2.17α-Hydroxy-11β-(4-methylthiophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(66)

Nitrogen was bubbled through a mixture of EtOH (20 mL) and 8.5% H₂SO₄(2.0 mL) for ½ hr to remove oxygen. The Grignard adduct (57, 500 mg,0.92 mmol) was added as a solid with stirring. The mixture was put intoan oil bath preheated to 95° C. for hr. The mixture was cooled in an icebath and quenched with saturated K₂CO₃ (pH=10). The reaction mixture wasdiluted with H₂O (125 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organicfractions were washed with saturated NaHCO₃ (1×), H₂O (1×), brine (1×),combined and then dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄. It was concentrated invacuo to give 500 mg of 66 as an oil. This oil was purified by flashchromatography (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) to yield 350 mg of the crude 66.Crystallized from CH₂Cl₂ and ether gave 330 mg of 66 as a whitecrystalline product; m.p.=foams/honeycombs at 102-106° C. FTIR (KBr,diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3409, 2975, 2887, 1707, 1650, 1608, 1493and 1207 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.45 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.25 (s, 3H,C21-CH₃), 2.5 (s, 3H, 11β-4-CH₃S-phenyl), 3.1 (s, 1H, C17α-OH), 4.4 (brd, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.8 (s, 1H, C4-CH═) and 6.95-7.3 (dd, 4H,aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 436 (M⁺,100), 418(14.1), 350 (76.1), 335 (35.2), 323 (16.9), 296 (14.1), 281 (16.9), 249(16.9), 235 (39.4), 211 (18.3), 137 (87.3) and 91 (19.7). Anal. Calcdfor C₂₇H₃₂O₃S: C, 74.28; H, 7.39. Found: C, 73.01; H, 8.27.

Step 3. Preparation of the Target Compound 74

The 17α-hydroxy compound (66, 275 mg, 0.63 mmol) was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂(10 mL) and cooled to 0° C. in an ice bath. In a separate round flask,trifluoroacetic anhydride (2.65 g, 12.6 mmol) and acetic acid (0.83 g,12.6 mmol) were added to CH₂Cl₂ (10 mL), and the mixture was flushedwith nitrogen and stirred at room temperature for ½ hr. The mixedanhydride was then placed in an ice bath and cooled to 0° C. The coldmixed anhydride solution was then added to the 17α-hydroxy compound (66)and treated with p-toluenesulfonic acid (110 mg, 0.58 mmol). Thereaction mixture was stirred for 1 hr at 0° C. The reaction was quenchedwith saturated K₂CO₃ (pH=10), diluted with H₂O and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3×). The organic layers were washed with water (2×), brine (1×), driedover anhydrous Na₂SO₄, filtered and concentrated to yield 320 mg of 74as a crude product. The 17α-acetate (74) was purified on a flash column(10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) to yield 250 mg of 74. Crystallization fromCH₂Cl₂ and ether gave 210 mg of the pure 74 as a white solid in 70.5%yield; m.p.=234-236° C. HPLC analysis on a Waters Nova Pak a C₁₈ columneluted with MeOH:H₂O in the ratio of 70:30 at a flow rate of 1 mL/minand at λ=260 nm indicated it to be 99.7% pure. FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance) ν_(max) 943, 1729, 1713, 1660, 1594, 1491, 1438, 1363 and1258 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.38 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.10 (s, 3H, C17α-OAc),2.15 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 2.45 (s, 3H, 11β-4-CH₃S-phenyl), 4.45 (d, 1H,C11α-CH), 5.8 (s, 1H, C4-CH═) and 7.0-7.35 (dd, 4H, aromatic-CH's). MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity): 478 (M⁺, 28.2), 418 (28.2), 403 (28.2),375 (100), 347 (11.3), 294 (15.5), 281 (8.5), 265 (18.3), 251 (42.3),236 (15.5), 151 (18.3), 137 (60.6) and 91 (9.9). Anal. Calcd. forC₂₉H₃₄O₄S: C, 72.77; H, 7.16; S, 6.70. Found: C, 72.07; H, 7.07; S,6.81.

Example 22

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Methoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(97a) (FIG. 6)

Step 1. 17α-Hydroxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (92)

Under nitrogen, the diketal (50, 20.0 g, 49.7 mmol) was dissolved in amixture of THF (333 mL) and H₂O (333 mL) followed by trifluoroaceticacid (1 L, 13.46 mmol). The reaction mixture was then stirred at roomtemperature for ½ hr, after which time, TLC (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂,overspotted with concentrated NH₄OH indicated a complete reaction. Thereaction mixture was cooled in an ice bath and neutralized by thedropwise addition of concentrated (29.5%) NH₄OH (862 mL, ˜13.46 mol)over a period of about an hour. The reaction mixture was diluted withH₂O (˜500 mL) and extracted with methylene chloride (3×). The organicfractions were washed with saturated NaHCO₃ (1×) and H₂O (1×), brine(1×), then filtered through anhydrous sodium sulfate, combined andconcentrated in vacuo. Crystallization of the residue fromacetone/hexanes gave 12 g of the pure product 92 as a white crystallinesolid in 76.8% yield; m.p.=203-205° C. FTIR (KBr, diffusion reflectance)ν_(max) 3438, 2950, 1702, 1642 and 1593 cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) δ0.857 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.289 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃) and 5.669 (s, 1H,C4-CH═). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃): δ 14.703, 23.901, 25.341, 25.714, 27.515,27.615, 30.260, 30.765, 33.470, 36.971, 39.086, 47.846, 50.696, 89.565(C17), 122.015 (C4), 125.440 (C10). 145.632 (C9). 157.339 (C5), 199.824(C3) and 211.201 (C20). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 314 (M⁺, 100),296 (13.6), 271 (58.0), 213 (67:0) and 91 (35.9). Anal. Calcd. forC₂₀H₂₆O₃: C, 76.40; H, 8.34. Found: C, 76.23; H, 8.29.

Step 2. 17α-Methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (93)

A suspension of the 17α-hydroxy dienedione (92, 19 g, 31.80 mmol) inCH₃CN (167 mL) was stirred magnetically under nitrogen. Methyl iodide(134 mL; freshly opened) was added and a solution formed immediately.Silver oxide (8.1 g, 35.0 mmol) was added, the joints were well-greasedto prevent evaporation of methyl iodide, and the flask was wrapped infoil to protect the contents from light. The mixture was brought to agentle reflux and the reaction allowed to proceed overnight. The nextmorning, analysis by TLC (5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) indicated virtually allthe starting material had been converted to a single, less polarcomponent. The reaction was allowed to cool to room temperature andfiltered through a Celite filter cake on a sintered glass funnel. Thefiltrate was evaporated in vacuo to recover a thick syrup.Crystallization from boiling CH₃OH afforded small white crystals. Thecrystals were collected on a Buchner funnel, triturated with cold CH₃OH,and dried under vacuum to recover 5.74 g. Flash chromatography of themother liquors (5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) afforded 1.69 g of additionalmaterial. The total purified product recovered was 7.43 g of 93 as whitecrystals in 71.1% yield; m.p.=154-155° C. FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance) ν_(max) 2952, 1704, 1660, 1614 and 1583 cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (300MHz, CDCl₃) δ 0.739 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.164 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.141 (s,3H, C17α-OCH₃) and 5.672 (s, 1H, C4-CH═). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃): δ 14.264,23.156, 23.431. 23.775, 25.547, 25.753, 26.431, 27.445, 30.755, 30.793,37.054, 39.220, 47.243, 51.348, 52.258, 96.714 (C17), 122.057 (C4),125.228 (C10), 145.588 (C9), 157.192 (C5), 199.637 (C3) and 210.479(C20). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 328 (M⁺, 5.8), 285 (66), 253(64) and 213 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₂₁H₂₈O₃: C, 76.79; H, 8.59. Found:C, 76.64; H, 8.59.

Step 3.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-17α-methoxy-19-norpregna-5(10),9(11)-dien-20-one (94)

Under nitrogen, a mixture of the 17α-methoxydione (93, 17.0 g, 51.76mmol), triethylorthoformate (42.5 mL, 250 mmol), ethylene glycol (14 mL,250 mmol) and p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (0.5 g, 2.6 mmol) indry CH₂Cl₂ (500 mL) was stirred at room temperature for ½ hr. After thattime, TLC (2% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) indicated absence of starting materialwith formation of one major product. The reaction mixture was dilutedwith CH₂Cl₂ (˜200 mL) and washed with saturated NaHCO₃ solution (1×),H₂O (1×) and brine. The organic fractions were filtered throughanhydrous sodium sulfate, combined and concentrated in vacuo.Recrystallization of the residue from hot methanol containing a trace ofpyridine gave 16.2 g of the pure 3-ketal 94 as a white solid in 84.1%yield; m.p.=123-125° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 2927 and1705 cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) 0.553 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.147 (s, 3H,C21-CH₃), 3.147 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃), 3.983 (s, 4H, C3-ketal) and 5.568(br s, 1H, C11-CH═). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃): δ 15.746, 23.123, 24.026, 24.570,26.422, 27.972, 31.150, 31.298, 31.839, 38.233, 41.238, 46.079, 47.391,52.318, 64.325, 64.448, 96.792, 108.131, 117.907, 126.081, 129.914 and135.998 (signal/noise ratio obscured C20 at ˜210 ppm). Anal. Calcd. forC₂₃H₃₂O₄: C, 74.16; H, 8.66. Found: C, 74.16; H, 8.68.

Step 4.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α,10α-epoxy-17α-methoxy-19-norpregn-9(11)-en-20-one(95)

Hydrogen peroxide (30% 3.0 mL, 29.3 mmol) was added to a vigorouslystirred mixture of hexafluoroacetone trihydrate (4.0 mL, 28.7 mmol) inCH₂Cl₂ (70 mL) cooled to 0° C. in an ice bath. After stirring at 0° C.for ½ hr, solid Na₂HPO₄ (2.1 g, 14.8 mmol) was added followed by asolution of the 3-ketal (94, 7.0 g, 18.8 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (70 mL),precooled to 0° C. The mixture was then stirred at 5° C. overnight. Thereaction mixture was diluted with CH₂Cl₂ (˜200 mL) and washed with 10%Na₂SO₃ solution (1×) and H₂O (2×). The organic fractions were filteredthrough anhydrous Na₂SO₄, combined and concentrated in vacuo to give7.29 g of 95 as a white foam in quantitative yield. Attempts tocrystallize out the 5α,10α-epoxide by trituration with ether/pentane ormixtures of CH₂Cl₂ and pentane were unsuccessful. Analysis by NMRindicated a 4:1 mixture of the 5α,10α- and the 5β,10β-epoxides. NMR (300MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.554 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.139 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.8-4.0(m, 4H, C3-ketal CH₂'s), 5.845 (m, 0.2H, C11-CH═ of β-epoxide) and 6.034(m, 0.8H, C11-CH═ of α-epoxide).

Step 5.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α-hydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-17α-methoxy-19-norpregn-9(10)-en-20-one(96a)

Magnesium (2.49 g, 102.45 mmol) was added to a 2.0 L, 3-neck flask witha mechanical stirrer, addition funnel and a condenser. The system wasflushed with nitrogen and flame dried. After cooling, dry THF (100 mL)and 1,2-dibromoethane (0.2 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred undernitrogen and heated in a warm water bath until evidence of the reactionwas observed. A solution of 4-bromo-N,N-dimethylaniline (18.81 g, 94mmol) in dry THF (100 mL) was then added via the addition funnel and themixture stirred and heated in a warm water bath until reactioninitiated. Solid copper (I) chloride (1.86 g, 18.8 mmol) was addedfollowed ½ hr later by a solution of the 4:1 epoxide mixture (95, 7.29g, 18.8 mmol=assumed 5.47 g of the 5α,10α-epoxide (14.10 mmol)) in dryTHF (125 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for1.5 hr, then quenched by the addition of saturated NH₄Cl solution (250mL). In order to oxidize Cu(I) to Cu(II), air was drawn through thereaction mixture for ½ hr with vigorous stirring. The mixture was thenextracted with ether (3×). The organic fractions were washed with H₂O(3×), combined, dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄, filtered and concentratedin vacuo to give 14.5 g of residue as a green-blue oil. This materialwas purified via Flash chromatography using CH₂Cl₂ followed by 4%acetone in CH₂Cl₂ to give 4.4 g of the pure compound 96a as a grey foamin 62.7% yield based on the 4:1 α:β ratio. FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance) ν_(max) 3526, 2944, 1707, 1613, and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR (300MHz, CDCl₃) δ 0.223 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.155 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 2.894 (s,6H, N(CH₃)₂), 3.105 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃), 3.896-3.995 (m, 4H, C3-ketalCH₂'s), 4.255 (m, 1H, C11α-CH), 6.624 (d, 2H, J=9.0 Hz,3′,5′aromatic-CH's), and 7.03 (d, 2H, J=9.0 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's).Anal. Calcd. for C₃₁H₄₃NO₅.⅕H₂O: C, 72.54; H, 8.52; N, 2.73. Found: C,72.36; H, 8.52; N, 2.52.

Step 6 Preparation of the Target Compound 97a

Under nitrogen, a solution of the Grignard adduct 96a, 3.73 g, 7.32mmol) in THF (40 mL) was treated with H₂O (40 mL) and glacial AcOH (120mL). After stirring overnight at room temperature, TLC (5% acetone inCH₂Cl₂) indicated incomplete hydrolysis. The mixture was heated to ˜50°C. in a warm water bath for 1 hr, after which time TLC indicated acomplete reaction. The mixture was cooled in an ice bath and neutralizedwith the addition of concentrated NH₄OH (141 mL). The mixture was thenfurther diluted with H₂O (˜200 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). Theorganic fractions were washed with H₂O (2×), filtered through anhydrousNa₂SO₄, combined and concentrated in vacuo to give 4.0 g of residue as ayellow foam. This material was purified by flash chromatography (3%acetone in CH₂Cl₂) to give 1.6 g of the pure title compound (97a) as afoam along with 1.2 g of additional material contaminated with aby-product having a slightly higher R_(f). Crystallization of the firstfraction from boiling heptane afforded the pure title compound (97a, 1.2g) as an off-white solid in 36.6% yield; m.p. 164-166° C. FTIR (KBr,diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 2953, 1707, 1666, 1614, 1601 and 1520 cm⁻¹.NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 0.297 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.18 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃),2.903 (s, 6H, N(CH₃)₂), 3.141 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃), 4.355 (d, 1H, J=7.2Hz, C11-CH), 5.745 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.638 (d, 2H, J=9.0 Hz, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 6.994 (d, 2H, J=9.0 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI)m/z (relative intensity): 447 (M⁺, 72.8), 372 (6.5), 251 (15.1), 134(30.2) and 121 (100).

Analysis by HPLC on a Waters Assoc. NovaPak C₁₈ column eluted withMeOH/H₂O/Et₃N, 75:25:0.05 at a flow rate of 1 mL per min and λ=302 nmindicated compound 97a to be 98.33% pure with t_(R) of 9.00 min. Anal.Calcd. for C₂₉H₃₇NO₃. 1/12H₂O: C, 77.56; H, 8.34; N, 3.12. Found: C,77.59; H, 8.34; N, 3.10.

Example 23

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Methoxy-11β-[4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(97b) (FIG. 6)

Step 13,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α-hydroxy-17α-methoxy-11β-[4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-5(10),9(11)-dien-20-one(96b)

Magnesium (845 mg, 34.7 mmol) was added to a 500 mL, 3-neck flaskequipped with a reflux condenser, a magnetic stirrer and a rubberseptum. A small crystal of iodine was added and the system flushed withnitrogen and flame dried. After cooling, dry THF (20 mL) and1,2-dibromoethane (0.2 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred undernitrogen and heated in a warm water bath until evidence of the reactionwas observed. A solution of N-(4-bromophenyl)piperidine (Veradro, etal., Synthesis, 447-450 (1991)) (8.35 g, 34.7 mmol) in dry THF (30 mL)was then added via syringe and the mixture stirred and heated in a warmwater bath for 3½ hr. Solid copper (I) chloride (688 mg, 6.95 mmol) wasadded followed ½ hr later by a solution of the epoxide mixture (95, 2.7g, assumed 6.95 mmol) in dry THF (30 mL). The reaction mixture wasstirred at room temperature for 45 min, then quenched by the addition ofsaturated NH₄Cl solution. In order to oxidize Cu (I) to Cu (II), air wasdrawn through the reaction mixture for ½ hr with vigorous stirring. Themixture was then extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions werewashed with saturated NH₄Cl solution, H₂O and brine, combined, driedover Na₂SO₄, filtered and concentrated in vacuo to give 11.3 g of theresidue as a dark oil. The material was purified via flashchromatography (5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) twice to give 1.22 g of theGrignard adduct 96b as a white foam in 32% yield; m.p.=126-131° C.(dec). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3523, 2938, 1707, 1610,1511 and 1447 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 0.207 (s, 3H, C18-Me), 1.682(m, 6H, —(CH₂)₃— of piperidine), 2.147 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.103 (s, 3H,C17α-OCH₃), 3.05-3.2 (m, 4H, —N(CH₂ )₂—), 3.8-4.05 (m, 4H, C3-ketal),4.23 (m, 1H, C11α-CH) and 6.78-7.05 (dd, 4H, aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 549 (M⁺, 59.7), 531 (18.1), 174 (20.8), 161 (100)and 99 (11.1). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₄H₄₇O₅N: C, 74.28; H, 8.62; N, 2.55.Found: C, 73.45; H, 8.51; N, 2.53.

Step 4. Preparation of the Target Compound 97b

Under nitrogen, a solution of the Grignard adduct (96b, 1.0 g, 1.81mmol) in THF (10 mL) was treated with H₂O (10 mL) and glacial HOAc (30mL). After stirring overnight at room temperature, TLC (5% acetone inCH₂Cl₂) indicated incomplete deketalzation and dehydration. The reactionmixture was heated to −50° C. in a warm water bath for ½ hr, after whichtime TLC indicated a complete reaction. The mixture reaction was cooledin an ice bath and neutralized with the addition of concentrated NH₄OH(˜35 mL). The mixture was then further diluted with H₂O (˜100 mL) andextracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions were washed with H₂O,brine, combined, dried over Na₂SO₄, and concentrated in vacuo to give900 mg of foam. The crude material was purified by flash chromatography(5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) to give 630 mg of the target compound 97b as afoam. Recrystallization of the compound 97b from EtOH afforded 325 mg ofthe target compound 97b as an off-white solid in 35.7% yield. HPLCanalysis of 97b on a Waters NovaPak C₁₈ column eluted with MeOH/H₂O(80:20) with 0.05% Et₃N at a flow rate of 1 mL/min and λ=260 nmindicated this compound to be 97.7% pure. FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance) ν_(max) 2934, 1708, 1665, 1610 and 1512 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz,CDCl₃) δ 0.273 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.174 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.139 (s, 3H,C17α-OCH₃), 4.35 (d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.746 (s, 1H, C4-CH═) and 6.8-7.0(dd, 4H, aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 487 (84.3),412 (4.3), 318 (8.6), 251 (7.14), 206 (11.4), 174 (15.7) and 161 (100).Anal. Calcd. for C₃₂H₄₁O₃N: C, 78.85; H, 8.42; N, 2.87. Found: C, 78.00;H, 8.37; N, 3.00.

Example 24

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α,21-Diacetoxy-11β-[4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(106a) (FIG. 7)

Step 1.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-17β-cyano-17α-trimethylsilyloxyesttra-5(10),9(11)-diene(99)

Under nitrogen, pyridine (136.9 g, 1740 mmol) solution of thecyanohydrin ketal (98, 25 g, 73.22 mmol) was treated withchlorotrimethylsilane (44 g, 394 mmol). The mixture was stirred at roomtemperature overnight. The reaction mixture was poured into a 50:50mixture of ice/saturated NaHCO₃ solution (˜1.2 L), stirred until the icehad melted, and extracted with hexane (3×). The organic extracts werewashed with H₂O (3×), brine (1×), combined, dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄,and concentrated in vacuo. The remaining pyridine was azeotropicallyremoved in vacuo with heptane. Crystallization of the residue frompentane gave 26.1 g of the pure silyl ether (99) as a white solid in86.2% yield; m.p.=99-101° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max)2944, 2908, 2231 and 1253 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 0.229 (s, 9H,C17α-OSi(CH₃)₃), 0.894 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 3.987 (s, 4H, 3-OCH₂CH₂ O) and5.615 (t, 1H, J=2.55 Hz, C11-CH═). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 413(M⁺, 100.0), 398 (5.5), 385 (24.0), 371 (6.4), 237 (33.9) and 69.3(86.0).

Step 2.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α,10α-epoxy-17β-cyano-17α-trimethylsilyloxyestr-9(11)-ene(100)

Hydrogen peroxide (30%, 12 mL, 117.12 mmol) was added to a vigorouslystirred mixture of hexafluoroacetone trihydrate (20.20 g, 112.5 mmol) inCH₂Cl₂ (185 mL) cooled to 0° C. in an ice bath. The reaction mixture wasstirred at 0° C. for ½ hr, and solid Na₂HPO₄ (11 g, 77.5 mmol) was addedfollowed by an ice-cold solution of the silyl ether (99, 25 g, 60.44mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (185 mL). The mixture was then stirred at 0° C. for 5hr, then at 5° C. overnight. Analysis by TLC (5% acetone in CH₂C2) atthat time indicated a complete reaction. The reaction mixture wasdiluted with CH₂Cl₂ (200 mL) and washed with 10% Na₂SO₃ solution (1×),H₂O (1×) and brine (1×). The organic fractions were filtered throughanhydrous sodium sulfate, combined and concentrated in vacuo.Trituration of the residue with ether afforded 16.66 g of the pure5α,10α-epoxide (100) as a white solid in 64.16% yield; m.p. 156-160° C.FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 2955, and 2228 cm⁻¹. NMR (300MHz, CDCl₃) δ 0.219 (s, 9H, OSi(CH₃)₃), 0.894 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃),3.85-3.97 (s, 4H, C3-OCH₂CH₂ O) and 6.082 (t, 1H, J=2.6 Hz, C11-CH═). MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity): 429 (M⁺, 18.5), 401 (2.8), 343 (11.1),238 (9.5), 99 (100.0) and 86 (36.2).

Step 3.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α-hydroxy-11β-[4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-17β-cyano-17α-trimethyl-silyloxyestr-9-ene(101a)

Magnesium (0.95 g, 39.1 mmol) was added to a 500 mL, 3-neck flaskequipped with a magnetic stirrer, rubber septum and a condenser. Acrystal of iodine was added followed by dry THF (50 mL) and two drops of1,2-dibromoethane. A solution of N-(4-bromophenyl)piperidine (see,EXAMPLE 23, Step 1) (10.24 g, 42.64 mmol) in dry THF (50 mL) was thenadded, and the mixture was stirred under nitrogen and heated to refluxfor 1 hr. At the end of that time, all of the magnesium metal hadreacted. The reaction was allowed to cool to room temperature, and solidcopper (I) chloride (0.7 g, 7.07 mmol) was added followed ½ hr later bya solution of the 5α,10α-epoxide (100, 5.55 g, 12.92 mmol) in dry THF(50 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1.5 hr.Analysis by TLC (5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) of a small aliquot quenched withNH₄Cl solution and extracted with EtOAc indicated a complete reaction.The reaction mixture was cooled in an ice bath and quenched by theaddition of saturated NH₄Cl solution (15 mL). The reaction mixture wasallowed to warm to room temperature, and air was drawn through thereaction mixture for ½ hr to oxidize Cu(I) to Cu(II). The mixture wasextracted wtih CH₂Cl₂ (3×) and the organic fractions washed with H₂O(3×). The organic fractions were combined, dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄,filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Trituration of the residue withpentane gave 7.37 g of 101a as an off-white solid in 97% yield;m.p.=127-130° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) ν_(max) 3510, 2945,2228, 1611 and 1510 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 0.241 (s, 9H,17α-OSi(CH₃)₃, 0.533 (s, 3H, C18-CH3), 3.107 (t, 4H, J=5.6 Hz,piperidine α-CH₂'s), 3.884-4.043 (s, 4H, C3-OCH₂CH₂ O) 4.284 (d, 1H,J=6.9 Hz, C11α-CH), 6.831 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and7.060 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relativeintensity): 590 (M⁺, 38.1), 572 (10.3), 320 (4.0), 174 (12.1), 161(100.0), 100 (1.7), 99 (7.8) and 71 (7.0) Anal. Calcd. forC₃₅H₅₀N₂O₄Si.⅓C₅H₁₁: C, 71.61; H, 8.85; N, 4.56. Found: C, 71.79; H,8.89; N, 4.49.

Step 4.17β-cyano-11β-[4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-17α-hydroxyestra-4,9-dien-3-one(102a)

A solution of the Grignard adduct 101a, 7.27 g, 12.3 mmol) was dissolvedin THF (25 mL) and the system was flushed with nitrogen. Glacial aceticacid (75 mL) and H₂O (25 mL) were added and the mixture was heated to65° C. for 3 hr. Analysis by TLC (5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) at that timeindicated a complete reaction. The mixture was cooled to 0° C. in an icebath and the acetic acid was neutralized by slow addition ofconcentrated NH₄OH solution (28%, ˜90 mL) to a final pH of ˜8 by pHpaper. The mixture was diluted with H₂O and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×).The organic fractions were washed with H₂O (3×), filtered throughanhydrous Na₂SO₄, combined and concentrated in vacuo. Trituration of theresidue with ether gave 3.8 g of the cyanohydrin (102a) as a whitecrystalline solid. The mother liquors were concentrated and purified byflash column chromatography (5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) to afford anadditional 0.65 g of 102a after trituration with pentane. Total yield ofthe cyanohydrin (102a was 4.45 g in 79.2% yield; m.p.=205-208° C. FTIR(KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3436, 3211, 2939, 2855, 2234, 1658,1634, 1609 and 1512 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.641 (s, 3H,C18-CH₃), 3.125 (t, 4H, J=5.7 Hz, piperidine α-CH₂'s), 4.427 (d, 1H,J=5.1 Hz, C11α-CH), 5.782 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.862 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 7.031 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI)m/z (relative intensity): 456 (M⁺, 0.3), 429 (61.1), 401 (1.5), 174(6.9), and 161 (100.0). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₀H₃₆N₂O₂. 1/10H₂O: C, 78.60;H, 7.96; N, 6.11. Found: C, 78.64; H, 7.94; N, 6.11.

Step 5.17β-cyano-11β-[4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-17α-chloromethyldimethylsilyloxyestra-4,9-dien-3-one(103a)

Under nitrogen, a solution of the cyanohydrin (102a, 4.39 g, 9.61 mmol)and dimethylaminopyridine (0.4 g, 3.27 mmol) in dry THF (50 mL) andtriethylamine (1.8 g, 17.79 mmol) was treated withchloromethyldimethylsilyl chloride (2.0 mL=2.17 g, 15.18 mmol). Afterstirring overnight at room temperature, TLC (2% acetone in CH₂Cl₂)indicated a complete reaction. The reaction was diluted with ether (50mL) and stirred for an additional ½ hr. The resulting suspension wasfiltered through Celite and the filtrate concentrated in vacuo. Theresidue was taken up in ether/CH₂Cl₂ (9:1) and the solution/suspensionwas passed through a silica gel flash chromatography column using etheras eluent. Fractions containing the product were combined andconcentrated in vacuo to give 5.4 g of the chloromethyl silyl ether(103a) as a white foam in quantitative yield. Attempts to crystallize orsoldify the crude product using a variety of solvents were unsuccessful.This material was used in the subsequent reaction without furtherpurification. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.403 and 0.410 (both s, 6H,OSi(CH₃)₂), 0.607 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.904 (s, 2H, (CH₃)₂SiCH₂ Cl), 3.123(t, 4H, J=5.6 Hz, piperidine α-CH₂'s), 4.399 (d, 1H, J=6 Hz, C11α-CH),5.775 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.863 (d, 2H, J=8.6 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and7.027 (d, 2H, J=8.6 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's).

Step 6.17α-Hydroxy-11β-[4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-21-chloro-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(104a)

Under nitrogen and anhydrous conditions, a solution of the chloromethylsilyl ether (103a, 5.1 g, 9.05 mmol) in dry THF (150 mL) was cooled to−78° C., and treated dropwise with a 2.0 M solution of lithiumdiisopropylamide (LDA) in THF/heptane (19 mL, 38 mmol). The reaction wasstirred at −78° C. for ½ hr and then quenched at −78° C. by the slowaddition of 4 N HCl (100 mL, 400 mmol). The mixture was allowed to warmand stirred at room temperature for 1 hr. The reaction was cooled to 0°C. and the excess acid was neutralized by slow addition of concentratedNH₄OH solution (˜25 mL). The reaction mixture was diluted with H₂O (˜100mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions were washedwith H₂O (2×), filtered through anhydrous Na₂SO₄, combined andconcentrated in vacuo to give 5.6 g of a residue as a yellow foam.

This material was triturated with EtOAc to give 2.64 g of the pure21-chloro product 104a as a yellow solid. Concentration of the motherliquors followed by flash column chromatography (7.5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂)and trituration with EtOAc gave an additional 0.54 g of the product.Total yield of the 21-chloro intermediate (104a) was 3.18 g in 69.17%yield; m.p.=231-234° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3395,2939, 1730, 1649, 1602 and 1512 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.382 (s,3H, C18-CH₃), 3.104 (t, 4H, J=5.4 Hz, piperidine α-CH₂'s), 4.343 and4.614 (dd, 25H, J=16.5 Hz, C21-CH₂), 4.380 (d, 1H, J=6.0 Hz, C11α-CH),5.762 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.826 (d, 2H, J=8.9 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and6.981 (d, 2H, J=8.9 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relativeintensity): 507 (M⁺, 23.7), 471 (18.0), 318 (6.5), and 161 (100.0).Anal. Calcd. for C₃₁H₃₈CINO₃.⅙CH₂Cl₂: C, 71.06; H, 743; N, 2.66; Cl,8.98. Found: C, 71.06; H, 7.55; N, 2.73; Cl, 8.78.

Step 7.17α-Hydroxy-11β-[4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-21-acetoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(105a)

The 21-chloro intermediate (104a, 3.0 g, 5.9 mmol) and anhydrouspotassium acetate (6.0 g, 61.14 mmol) in dry CH₃CN (75 ml) was heated toreflux under nitrogen and monitored by TLC (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) whichindicated a complete reaction after 3 hr. The reaction mixture wascooled to room temperature, diluted with CH₂Cl₂ (˜50 mL), filtered andconcentrated in vacuo to give 4.1 g of the residue as a yellow solid.This material was crystallized from CH₂Cl₂/acetone to give 2.63 g of thepure 17α-ol-21-acetate (105a) as an off-white solid in 83.8% yield;m.p.=277-281° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3440, 2937,1742, 1727, 1648, 1601 and 1513 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.379 (s,3H, C18-CH₃), 2.174 (s, 3H, C21-OAc), 3.101 (t, 4H, J=5.4 Hz, piperidineα-CH₂'s), 4.376 (d, 1H, J=6.6 Hz, C11α-CH), 4.864 and 5.106 (dd, 2H,J=17.3 Hz, C21-CH₂), 5.762 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.836 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 7.016 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI)m/z (relative intensity): 531 (M⁺, 28.3), 513 (2.9), 501 (3.2), 471(7.4), 174 (11.6) and 161 (100.0). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₃H₄₁NO₅.⅕CH₂Cl₂:C, 72.68; H, 7.61; N, 2.55. Found: C, 72.73; H, 7.53; N, 2.70.

Step 8. Preparation of the Target Compound 106a

A mixture of trifluoroacetic anhydride (7.9 g, 37.6 mmol) and glacialacetic acid (2.21 g, 36.7 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (25 mL) was stirred atroom temperature under nitrogen for 1 hr. p-Toluenesulfonic acidmonohydrate (0.79 g, 4.15 mmol) was added, and the mixture was cooled to0° C. in an ice bath. A solution of the 17α-ol-21-acetate (105a, 2.0 g,3.76 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (35 mL) was added and the reaction mixturestirred at 0° C. for 2.5 hr. Assays by TLC (5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) atthat time indicated >90% of the starting material had been consumed. H₂O(˜10 mL) was added and the reaction stirred at 0° C. for 10 min.Additional H₂O (˜50 mL) was added and the reaction allowed to warm toroom temperature. The pH of the reaction mixture was carefully adjustedto 9.0 with concentrated NH₄OH and the mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3×). The organic fractions were washed with H₂O (2×), brine (1×),filtered through anhydrous Na₂SO₄, combined and concentrated in vacuo togive 2.3 g of a yellow foam. Purification of this crude 106a by flashchromatographies (7.5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) followed by crystallizationfrom ether gave the 17α,21-diacetate 106a in two crops, both as whitecrystalline solids. Crop 1 (0.68 g), m.p.=188-189° C. Crop 2 (0.672 g),m.p.=186-188° C. Total was 1.352 g in 62.6% yield. Analysis of 106a byHPLC on a Water Associates NovaPak C₁₈ eluted with CH₃CN/0.05 M KH₂PO₄[pH=3.0] at a flow rate of 1 mL per minute and λ=302 nm) indicated thefirst crop to be 99.1% pure and the second crop to be 98.1% pure. FTIR(KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 2939, 2858, 2793, 1748, 1729, 1669,1600 and 1509 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.417 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃),2.125 (s, 3H, C17α-OAc), 2.168 (s, 3H, C21-OAc), 3.104 (t, 4H, J=5.35Hz, piperidine α-CH₂'s), 4.386 (d, 1H, J=6.6 Hz, C11α-CH), 4.403 and4.946 (dd, 2H, J=16.8 Hz, C21-CH₂OAc), 5.781 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.832 (d,2H, J=9 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.011 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 573 (M⁺, 46.3), 513(11.5), 174 (10.4) and 161 (100.0). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₅H₄₃NO₆: C,73.27; H, 7.55; N, 2.44. Found: C, 73.18; H, 7.60; N, 2.50.

Example 25

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α,21-Diacetoxy-11β-(4-acetylphenyl)19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(106b) (FIG. 7)

Step 1.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α-hydroxy-11β-[4-(2-methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)phenyl]-17β-cyano-17α-trimethylsilyloxyestr-9-ene(101b)

Under nitrogen and in flame-dried glassware, dry THF (240 mL) was addedto magnesium turnings (2.3 g, 94.6 mmol). Solid bromoacetophenone ketal(see, EXAMPLE 20, Step 1) (20.79 g, 85.5 mmol) was added and the mixtureheated to refux. After ½ hr of reflux, evidence of Grignard formationsuch as cloudiness and color change was observed. Heating wasdiscontinued and the mixture stirred for 1 hr, after which time most ofthe magnesium had reacted and a substantial amount of the precipitatedGrignard ragent was observed. Solid CuCl (4 g, 40.4 mmol) was added andthe mixture was stirred at room temperature for 15 min, after which timethe solid reagent went back into solution. A solution of the5α,10α-epoxide (100, 17.5 g, 40.73 mmol) in THF (150 mL) was added andthe reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 hr. Afterthat time, TLC (5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) of a small aliqout quenched withsaturated NH₄Cl solution indicated a complete reaction. The reaction wasquenched by the addition of saturated NH₄Cl solution (˜50 mL). In orderto oxidize Cu(I) to Cu(II), air was drawn through the reaction mixturefor ½ hr. The resulting blue mixture was diluted with ether (500 mL) andwashed with H₂O (2×), brine (1×), dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄, filteredand concentrated in vacuo to give 41 g of the residue as an oil.Crystallization of this crude material from ether gave the pure 101b(23.0 g) as a white solid in 95% yield; m.p.=192-193° C. FTIR (KBr,diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3515, 2951, 2884, 2230, 1619, 1505 and1102 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.25 (s, 9H, Si(CH₃)₃), 0.5 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃),1.67 (s, 3H, C11β-(acetophenone ketal CH₃), 3.67-4.17 (m, 8H,C3-OCH₂CH₂O—), 4.37 (m, 2H, C11α-CH plus OH), 7.17 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's) and 7.37 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI)m/z (relative intensity): 593 (M⁺, 3.6), 578 (6.0), 575 (9.1), 560(2.5), 366 (5.2), 99 (27.3) and 87 (100.0). Anal. Calcd. forC₃₄H₄₇NO₆Si: C, 68.77; H, 7.98; N, 2.36. Found: C, 68.69; H, 7.87; N,2.43.

Step 2. 17β-cyano-17α-hydroxy-11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-estra-4,9-dien-3-one(102b)

A solution of the Grignard adduct (101b, 23 g, 38.7 mmol) was dissolvedin THF (100 mL) and the system was flushed with nitrogen. Glacial aceticacid (314.7 g, 524 mmol) and H₂O (100 mL) were added and the mixture wasstirred overnight at room temperature. At that time, TLC (10%acetone/CH₂Cl₂) indicated an incomplete reaction. The reaction mixturewas then heated to reflux for 1 hr, after which time TLC indicated acomplete reaction.

The volatiles were removed in vacuo at 50° C. and the residue dilutedwith H₂O (˜250 mL) and saturated NaHCO₃ solution (˜125 mL). Thesubsequent precipitate was extracted with EtOAc (5×) with somedifficulty in that the crude product was relatively insoluble in mostsolvents used. The organic fractions were washed with H₂O (2×), brine(1×), combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered andconcentrated in vacuo. Trituration of the residue with ether gave thecyanohydrin (102b, 16.3 g) as a light yellow solid in 100% yield;m.p.=141-143° C. (dec). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3362,2966, 2946, 2232, 1619, 1730, 1658 and 1600 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃+d₆ DMSO): δ0.57 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.60 (s, 3H, C11β-(4-phenyl-C(O)CH₃), 4.57 (br s,1H, C11α-CH), 5.80 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 7.40 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's) and 7.97 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI)m/z (relative intensity): 415 (M⁺,0.5), 404 (0.4), 388 (100.0), 292 (65)and 97 (51.0). Anal. Calcd. for C₂₇H₂₉NO₃.⅓H₂O: C, 76.93; H, 7.09; N,3.32. Found: C, 77.04; H, 6.99; N, 3.45.

Step 3.11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-17β-cyano-17α-bromethyldimethylsilyloxyestra-4,9-dien-3-one(103b)

Under nitrogen, a solution of the cyanohydrin (102b, 15 g, 36.12 mmol),Et₃N (6.53 g, 64 mmol) and DMAP (2.6 g, 21.3 mmol) in dry THF (180 mL)was treated with bromomethyldimethylsilyl chloride (9.70 g, 54 mmol).The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature, diluted withether (500 mL), filtered through Celite and concentrated in vacuo. Therelative insolubility of this material (103b) precludes chromatographicpurification useing ether as eluent. The crude material (103b) was useddirectly in the subsequent reaction without further purification orcharacterization.

Step 4.17α-Hydroxy-11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-21-bromo-19-norpregna-4,9-dien-3-one(104b)

Under anhydrous conditions and using a mechanical stirrer, a solution ofthe silyl ether (103b) (assumed 20.34 g, 36.12 mmol) in dry THF (500 mL)was cooled to −78° C. and treated dropwise with a 1.5 M solution oflithium diisopropylamide (LDA) in cyclohexane (100 mL, 150 mmol). After1 hr, the reaction mixture became very viscous, almost a gel. Thereaction was quenched at −78° C. by addition of 4.45 M HBr (500 mL, 890mmol) and the mixture allowed to warm to room temperature. Afterstirring at room temperature for 1 hr, the excess acid was neutralizedby slow addition of concentrated NH₄OH solution (˜60 mL). The mixturewas further diluted with H₂O (˜200 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×).The organic fractions were washed with H₂O (3×), combined, filteredthrough Na₂SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo to give 20 g of the residue asa foam. This material was purified via flash chromatography eluted with(10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) to give 2.6 g of the 21-bromo product 104b as awhite solid in 14.1% yield. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max)3340, 2946, 1723, 1693, 1679, 1645 and 1601 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.33(s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.19 (s, 3H, 11β-(4-phenyl-C(O)CH₃), 4.30-4.70 (m, 3H,C11α-CH and C21-CH₂Br), 5.83 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 7.33 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's) and 7.93 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI)m/z (relative intensity): 512 (M⁺,24.1), 466 (100), 432 (48.5), 431(48.5), 430 (86.4), 371 (71.9) and 91 (76.0).

Step 5.17α-Hydroxy-11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-21-acetoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(105b)

A mixture of the 21-bromo drivative (104b, 2.5 g, 4.89 mmol), anhydrousKOAc (20 g, 203.8 mmol) in dry CH₃CN (100 mL) was heated to reflux undernitrogen. After 2 hr, TLC (10% acetone in CH₂C2) indicated a completereaction. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, filteredand concentrated in vacuo to give 2.6 g as a foam. This material waspurified via flash chromatography (12% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) followed bycyrstallization from EtOAc to give 1.5 g of the pure 17α-ol-21-acetate(105b) as a light yellow solid in 62.6% yield; m.p.=softens at 110° C.FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3467, 2948, 1749, 1727, 1727,1681, 1380, 1664 and 1603 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.31 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃),2.15 (s, 3H, C17α-OC(O)CH₃), 2.57 (s, 3H, 11β-4-phenyl-C(O)CH₃ ), 4.5(br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.01 (dd, 2H, J₁=18.7 Hz, J₂=18 Hz, C21-CH₂ OAc),5.81 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 7.34 (d, 1H, J=8.2 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's), 7.35(d, 1H, J=6.8 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.93 (d, 2H, J=8.2 Hz, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 490 (M⁺, 88.0), 430(100.0), 344 (80.0), 236 (44.0), and 91 (55.0). Anal. Calcd. forC₃₀H₃₄O₆.⅕CH₂Cl₂: C, 70.99; H, 6.79. Found: C, 70.83; H, 6.65.

Step 6. Preparation of the Target Compound 106b

Under nitrogen trifluoroacetic anhydride (11.15 g, 53.2 mmol), glacialacetic acid (3.25 g, 54.2 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (35 mL) were combined andstirred at room temperature for ½ hr. p-Toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate(0.5 g, 2.63 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was cooled to 0°C. in an ice bath. A solution of the 17α-ol-21-acetate (105b, 1.28 g,2.61 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (10 mL) was precooled to 0° C. and then added.The reaction mixture was stirred at 0° C. After 45 min, TLC (10% acetonein CH₂Cl₂) indicated a complete reaction. The mixture was quenched at 0°C. with concentrated NH₄OH solution (˜10 mL, ˜148 mmol), allowed to warmto room temperature, and diluted with H₂O (˜50 mL). The pH of theaqueous fraction was adjusted to 5 with concentrated NH₄OH solution andthe mixture extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions werewashed with H₂O (3×), combined, dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄, filteredand concentrated in vacuo to give 1.8 g of the crude product as a foam.The crude material was purified via flash chromatography (5% acetone inCH₂Cl₂) to give 1.1 g of the purified diacetate (106b) as a foam.Crystallization of this foam from EtOAc/heptane afforded 0.78 g of thepure solid (106b) as a white crystalline solid in 56.1% yield;m.p.=197-199° C. Reverse phase HPLC analysis on Phenomenex Prodigy 5ODS-2 column eluted with H₂O/CH₃CN, 1:1 at a flow rate of 1 mL/min andat λ=302 nm indicated this material to be >99% pure with a retentiontime (t_(R)) of 5.6 min. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 2951,1757, 1678, 1664 and 1604 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.33 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃),2.07 (s, 3H, C17α-OC(O)CH₃), 2.10 (s, 3H, C21-OAc), 2.50 (s, 3H,C11β-4-phenyl-C(O)CH₃), 4.43 (m, 1H, C11α-CH), 4.77 (dd, 2H, J₁=32.9 Hz,J₂=14.9 Hz, C21-CH₂OAc), 5.77 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 7.23 (d, 2H, J=8 Hz,2′,6′ aromatic-CH's), and 7.83 (d, 2H, J=8 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's). MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity): 532 (M⁺, 6.2), 472 (17.3), 412 (11.3),371 (100.0) and 91 (14.3). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₂H₃₆. 1/7H₂O: C, 71.81; H,6.83. Found: C, 71.89; H, 6.87.

Example 26

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Acetoxy-11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-21-thioacetoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione106c) (FIG. 7)

Step 1.17α-Hydroxy-11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-21-thioacetoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(105c)

A mixture of the 21-bromo derivative (104b, 5.746 g, 11.23 mmol), sodiumiodide (16.84 g, 112.3 mmol), potassium thioacetate (12.83 g, 112.3mmol) in dry acetone (600 mL) was heated to reflux under nitrogen. After4 hr, TLC (50% EtOAc in hexanes) indicated a complete reaction. Thereaction was cooled to room temperature, filtered, concentrated invacuo, diluted with H₂O (˜200 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). Theorganic fractions were washed with H₂O (1×) and brine (1×), combined,dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, concentrated in vacuo to give thecrude product as a yellow foam. This material was purified by flashchromatography (50% EtOAc in hexanes) followed by crystallization fromEtOAc/hexanes to afford the pure 17α-ol-21-thioacetate (105c, 3.25 g,57.1%) as a white crystalline solid; m.p.=159-160° C. FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance): v_(max) 3325, 2950, 1723, 1688, 1637 and 1590 cm⁻¹. NMR(CDCl₃): δ 0.33 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.4 (s, 3H, C21-SC(O)CH₃), 2.57 (s,3H, C11β-4-phenyl-C(O)CH₃), 4.0 (dd, 2H, J₁=48.6 Hz, J₂=18 Hz, C21-CH₂SAc), 4.57 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.8 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 7.37 (d, 2H, J=9Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's), and 7.93 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's).MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 506 (M⁺, 29.1), 488 (14.4), 474(16.6), 431 (100.0) and 346 (78.1). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₀H₃₄O₅S.H₂O: C,68.68; H, 6.92; S, 6.11. Found: C, 68.99; H, 6.73; S, 6.06.

Step 2. Preparation of the Target Compound 106c

Under nitrogen, trifluoroacetic anhydride (17.43 g, 82.89 mmol), glacialacetic acid (7.17 g, 118.45 mmol), p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate(1.0 g, 5.3 mmol) and dry CH₂Cl₂ (100 mL) were combined and stirred atroom temperature for ½ h. The mixture was cooled to 0° C. in an ice bathand a solution of the 17α-ol-21-thioacetate (105c, 3.0 g, 5.92 mmol) indry CH₂Cl₂ (50 mL) was added. The mixture was stirred at 0° C. for 6 hrafter which time TLC (4% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) indicated a complete reaction.The mixture was neutralized with cold saturated NaHCO₃ and extractedwith CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions were washed with brine (2×),combined, dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated in vacuo to givethe crude product as a foam. Purification of this material by Flashchromatography eluting 4% acetone/CH₂Cl₂ followed by crystallizationfrom EtOAc/hexanes gave 2.34 g of the pure compound 106c as a yellowcrystalline solid; m.p.=204-205° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance):v_(max) 2948, 1734, 1702, 1676, 1663 and 1602 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.30(s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.15 (s, 3H, C17α-OC(O)CH₃), 2.33 (s, 3H,C21-SC(O)CH₃), 2.57 (s, 3H, C11β-4-phenyl-C(O)CH₃), 3.94 (dd, 2H,J₁=20.7 Hz, J₂=14.4 Hz, C21-CH₂ SAc), 4.53 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.83 (s,1H, C4-CH═), 7.37 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's), and 7.93 (d, 2H,J=9 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 548 (M⁺,6.3), 488 (18.4), 413 (27.4), 371 (100.0) and 280 (24.0). Anal. Calcd.for C₃₂H₃₆O₆S. 1/10H₂O: C, 69.82; H, 6.63; S, 5.82. Found: C, 68.83; H,6.67; S, 5.59.

Example 27

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α,21-Dimethoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(113a) (FIG. 8)

Step 1.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-17α-methoxy-21-hydroxy-19-norpregna-5(10),9(11)-dien-20-one(107)

To a solution of the 17α-methoxy-3-ketal (94, 10.0 g, 27.1 mmol) in dryTHF (150 mL) was added iodobenzene diacetate (Moriarty, et al., J. Chem.Soc., Chem. Commun., 641-642 (1981); Velerio, et al., Steroids,60:268-271 (1995)) (34.59 g, 4×) as a solid. The suspension was stirredunder nitrogen and cooled to 0° C. H₂O (7.73 mL, 429.6 mmol, 16×) wasadded, followed by 0.5 M KO-tBu solution (1400 mL, 700 mmol, 26×) viatransfer needle. (A 50:50 (v/v) mixture of freshly opened methanol (700mL) and 1.0 M potassium t-butoxide in THF (700 mL; Aldrich) was preparedand cooled to 0° C. to give a 0.5 M base solution). Upon completion ofaddition the reaction mixture was removed from the ice bath and thesolution alowed to warm to room temperature. The reaction was monitoredevery hour by TLC (5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) and after 4 hr, virtually allof the starting material had been converted to approximately a 80:20mixture of two more polar components. The reaction mixture was dilutedwith H₂O (500 mL) and brine (500 mL) and extracted into ether (3×).Organic fractions were washed again with H₂O and brine. Combined organicextracts were dried by filtration through Na₂SO₄, evaporated in vacuo,and further dried under high vacuum to recover 13.84 g of an orange oil.

Purification by flash chromatography (5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) gave 6.0 gof a pale yellow-white foam (107) in 57.5% yield. Trituration withpentane produced 107 which was dried under vacuum to recover 5.36 g of awhite powder in 51.0% yield; m.p.=147-152° C. FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance): v_(max) 3478, 2900, 2825, 1712, 1437, 1384 and 1372 cm⁻¹.NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.550 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 3.159 (s, 3H,C17α-OCH₃), 3.981 (s, 4H, C3-OCH₂CH₂ O), 4.251 and 4.471 (AB, 2H,J_(AB)=19.81 Hz, C21-CH₂) and 5.544 (br s, 1H, C11-CH═). MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 388 (M⁺, 54.8), 356 (13.8), 297 (100.0), 211(65.0), 169 (51.1) and 99 (56.3). Anal. Calcd. for C₂₃H₃₂O₅.¼H₂O: C,70.29; H, 8.34. Found: C, 70.21; H, 8.12.

Step 2.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-17α,21-dimethoxy-19-norpregna-5(10),9(11)-dien-20-one(108)

To a solution of the 3-ketal-21-hydroxy compound 107, 5.0 g, 12.87 mmol)in 500 mL of 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) was added Proton-Sponge®[1,8-bis(dimethylamino)naphthalene] (13.79 g, 64.35 mmol, 5×) as asolid. The solution was cooled to 0° C. in an ice water bath andtrimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate (9.52 g, 64.35 mmol, 5×) was added asa solid. The suspension was kept at 0° C. under nitrogen, for 3 hr. Atthat time, TLC (5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) indicated all of the startingmaterial had been cleanly converted to the slightly less polar3-ketal-17α,21-dimethoxy compound (108). H₂O and EtOAc were added, themixture was transferred to a separatory funnel, and the layers allowedto separate. The organic fraction was washed with ice-cold 1 N HCl (2×),H₂O (1×), saturated NaHCO₃ (1×), H₂O (1×), and brine (1×). Combind EtOAcextracts (3×) were dried by filtration through Na₂SO₄ and evaporated invacuo. The resulting colorless oil was dried overnight under high vacuumto recover a white foam (108, 5.28 g) in quantitative yield. Analysis byTLC and NMR indicated the crude material was sufficiently pure to carrydirectly on to the next reaction. A small amount was triturated withpentane and dried overnight under high vacuum to give 120 mg of 108 as awhite solid; m.p=104-110° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max)2926, 2884, 2828, 1722, 1447, 1380, 1322 and 1252 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz,CDCl₃): δ 0.585 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 3.175 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃), 3.442 (s,3H, C21-OCH₃), 3.983 (s, 4H, C3-OCH₂CH₂ O), 4.182 and 4.367 (AB, 2H,J_(AB)=18.01 Hz, C21-CH₂) and 5.555 (br s, 1H, C11-CH═). MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 402 (M⁺, 27.7), 370 (7.2), 297 (100.0), 211(62.1), 169 (41.6) and 99 (62.7). Anal. Calcd. for C₂₄H₃₄O₅.⅗H₂O: C,69.74; H, 8.58. Found: C, 69.82; H, 8.43.

Step 3.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-17α,21-dimethoxy-19-norpregna-5(10),9(11)-dien-20-ol(109)

The 3-ketal 17α,21-dimethoxy-20-one (108, 5.0 g, 12.42 mmol) wasdissolved in dry THF (100 mL) and 2 equivalents of LiAlH₄ (25 mL, 25mmol, 1.0 M in ether) were added via syringe. The solution was stirredmagnetically at room temperature under nitrogen. After 15 minutes,examination by TLC (5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) indicated the startingmaterial had been cleanly converted to a single, more polar product(109). The reaction mixture was cooled in an ice bath, and saturatedNa₂SO₄ (˜2-3 mL) was added dropwise via pipette. When the reaction wasquenched, several scoops of Na₂SO₄ were added and the mixture allowed tostir 1 hr. Filtration through a sintered glass funnel, followed byevaporation in vacuo produced a concentrated syrup. The syrup was takenup in H₂O and CH₂Cl₂, transferred to a separatory funnel, and the layersallowed to separate. The organic fraction was washed again with brine.Combined CH₂Cl₂ extracts (3×) were dried by filtration through Na₂SO₄and evaporated in vacuo. The resulting white foam was dried furtherunder high vacuum to recover 4.69 g of the crude 109. Purification ofthis crude product by flash chromatography (5% isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂)gave 4.24 g of 109 as a white foam in 84.4% yield.

The two purest fractions were combined and taken up in a minimum amountof acetone/hexane. After standing six days at room temperature, large,colorless crystals had formed. The crystals were collected bycentrifugation, washed with several portions of hexane, and dried underhigh vacuum to recover 177 mg. Analysis by TLC (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂)indicated the crystals were of the highest purity. Analysis of thismaterial by NMR indicated a single isomer. No further work was done foridentification of this single isomer. A second crop of 78 mg with only atrace of impurity was obtained from the mother liquors; m.p.=111-115° C.FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3576, 3456, 2930, 2891, 2827,1460 and 1372 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.824 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃),3.298 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃), 3.392 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 3.416 (dd, 1H,J₁=9.30 Hz, J₂=8.10 Hz, C21-CH₂), 3,490 (dd, 1H, J₁=9.30 Hz, J₂=3.30 Hz,C21-CH₂), 3.923 (dd, 1H, J₁=8.10 Hz, J₂=3.30 Hz, C20-CH), 3.980 (s, 4H,C3-OCH₂CH₂ O) and 5.595 (br s, 1H, C11-CH═). MS (EI) m/z (relativeintensity): 404 (M⁺, 2.1), 372 (5.7), 329 (1.7), 297 (100.0) and 211(35.7). Anal. Calcd. for C₂₄H₃₆O₅.⅕C₆H₁₄: C, 71.76; H, 9.27. Found: C,71.83; H, 9.04.

Step 4.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α,10α-epoxy-17α,21-dimethoxy-19-norpregn-9(11)-en-20-ol(110)

To a solution of hexafluoroacetone (2.01 mL, 14.39 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (50mL), was added solid Na₂HPO₄ (1.36 g, 9.59 mmol) and 30% H₂O₂ (2.16 mL,21.1 mmol). The mixture was transferred to the cold room and stirredvigorously for ½ hr at 4° C. A chilled solution of the 20-alcohol (109,3.88 g. 9.59 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (25 mL) was added via pipette and rinsed inwith additional CH₂Cl₂ (25 mL). After stirring overnight at 4° C., TLC(7.5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) indicated virtually all of the startingmaterial had been converted to one major, more polar product with only atrace of by-products. The reaction mixture was transferred to aseparatory funnel and washed with 10% Na₂SO₃ (1×), H₂O (1×), and brine(1×). Combined CH₂Cl₂ extracts (3×) were dried by filtration throughNa₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo to recover a foam. NMR analysis of thecrude material indicated the α and β epoxides were present inapproximately a 9:1 ratio. Trituration with ether produced 2.27 g of thepure 5α,10α epoxide (110) as a white powder in 56.3% yield;m.p.=146-153° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3558, 2939,1638, 1446, 1373 and 1247 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.824 (s, 3H,C18-CH₃), 3.273 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃), 3.389 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 3.402 (dd,1H, J₁=9.61 Hz, J₂=8.10 Hz, C21-CH₂), 3,476 (dd, 1H, J=9.1 Hz, J₂=3.30Hz, C21-CH₂), 3.908 (m, 5H, C3-OCH₂CH₂ O and C20-CH) and 6.053 (br s,1H, C11-CH═). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 420 (M⁺, 1.7), 402(6.0), 370 (6.2), 345 (20.0), 313 (77.8), 295 (100.0) and 99 (95.4).Anal. Calcd. for C₂₄H₃₆O₅. 1/10H₂O: C, 68.25; H, 8.64. Found: C, 68.31;H, 8.71.

Step 5.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α-hydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-17α,21-dimethoxy-19-norpregn-9-en-20-ol(111a)

A dry 50 mL 2-neck flask was equipped with a stirrer, a refluxcondenser, and a rubber septum. Magnesium (191 mg, 7.85 mmol) was addedand the entire apparatus was dried fruther, under a stream of nitrogen,with a heat gun. After cooling slightly, one crystal of iodine wasadded. The apparatus was allowed to cool completely and dry THF (4 mL)was added followed by one drop of 1,2-dibromoethane. A solution of4-bromo-N,N-dimethylaniline (1.43 g, 7.14 mmol) in THF (2 mL) was addedvia transfer needle and rinsed in with additional THF (2.0 mL). Themixture was warmed gently with a heat gun to initiate reaction (asevidenced by bleaching of color) and then allowed to stir 1 hr atambient temperature. Copper (I) chloride (78.2 mg, 0.79 mmol) was addedas a solid and stirring continued for 20 min. A solution of the5α,10α-epoxide (110, 1.0 g, 2.38 mmol) in THF (4.0 mL, heated gently toachieve a solution) was added via transfer needle and rinsed in withadditional THF (2×2.0 mL). After stirring 2 hr at room temperature, thereaction was quenched by the addition of saturated NH₄Cl (16 mL). Airwas drawn through the mixture for ½ hr with vigorous stirring. Themixture was transferred to a separatory funnel, ether was added, and thelayers allowed to separate. The organic fraction was washed again withH₂O (1×), and brine (1×). Combined ether extracts (3×) were dried byfiltration through Na₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo to recover an oilyresidue. Trituration with ether produced a solid 111a. The crystals werecollected on a Buchner funnel, triturated with additional ether, anddried under high vacuum to recover 1.02 g of a beige solid (IIIa) in 79%yield; m.p.=195-199° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3534,3418, 2938, 2875, 2820, 1868, 1614, 1560, 1519, 1443, 1353 and 1328cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.493 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.896 (s, 6H,—N(CH₃)₂), 3.289 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃), 3.362 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃),3.340-3.448 (m, 2H, C21-CH₂), 3.747-4.075 (m, 5H, C3-OCH₂CH₂ O andC20-CH), 4.171 (br s, 1H, C11α-CH), 6.635 (d, 2H, J=8.70 Hz, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 7.070 (d, 2H, J=8.70 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity): 541 (M⁺, 61.0), 523 (19.7), 416 (7.6),134 (37.4), 121 (100.0) and 99 (20.2). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₂H₄₇NO₆: C,70.95; H, 8.74; N, 2.59. Found: C, 70.92; H, 8.77; N, 2.65.

Step 6.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α-hydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-17α,21-dimethoxy-19-norpregn-9(10)-en-20-one(112a)

(a) Preparation of o-Iodoxybenzoic Acid

(Dess, et al., J. Org. Chem., 48:4155-4156 (1983)): The initialpreparation of IBX gave a material which appeared to be a mixture asevidenced by ¹³C NMR. Although the oxidant was not homogenous, 3equivalents of this material (assuming 100% IBX) cleanly converted the20-OH (111a) to the 20-ketone (112a). The preparation of IBX has beensince modified to obtain a homogeneous material with ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMRidentical to the reported spectra (Frigerio, et al., Tet. Letters,35:8019-8022 (1994)). Only 1.5 equivalents are necessary for oxidation(Frigerio, et al., Tet. Letters, 35:8019-8022 (1994); Frigerio, et al.,J. Org. Chem., 60:7272-7276 (1995)). This new material was used for thepreparation of 112b and 112c.

Potassium bromate (7.6 g, 45.5 mmol) was added over a 10 minute periodto a vigorously stirred suspension of 2-iodobenzoic acid (8.52 g, 34.4mmol) in 0.73 M H₂SO₄ (150 mL). Upon completion of addition, the mixturewas warmed to 65° C. in a water bath. Over the next hour, bromine wasevolved as was evidenced by a change in color from orange to white. Atthat time, a second aliquot of potassium bromate (7.6 g, 45.5 mmol) wasadded and stirring continued at 65° C. for an additional 2 hr. Themixture was cooled to room temperature, filtered on a Buchner funnel,and washed with H₂O, followed by acetone. The resulting white solid wasdried in vacuo to recover 7.74 g in 80.2% yield. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO):δ 7.845 (t, 1H, J=7.20 Hz), 7.96-8.06 (m, 2H) and 8.148 (d, 1H, J=7.80Hz). ¹³C NMR (300 MHz, DMSO): δ 125.011, 130.093, 131.398, 132.963,133.406, 146.525 and 167.499.

(b) Oxidation of the 20-ol (111a) to the 20-one (112a):

To a solution of IBX (2.42 g, 8.64 mmol) in DMSO (16.0 mL) at ambienttemperature, under nitrogen, a solution of the Grignard product (111a,1.56 g, 2.88 mmol) in DMSO (16.0 mL) was added via transfer needle.Additional DMSO (2×4.0 mL) was used to rinse in residual steroid. Theresulting purple solution was stirred ½ hr. At that time, examination byTLC (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂; aliquot was diluted in H₂O and extractedinto EtOAc) revealed all of the starting material had been cleanlyconverted to a single, less polar product. The reaction was transferredto a separatory funnel, H₂O and CH₂Cl₂ were added, and the layersallowed to separate. The organic fractions were washed again with H₂O(1×) and then brine (1×). Combined CH₂Cl₂ exracts (3×) were dried byfiltration through Na₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo. The resulting residuewas dried overnight under high vacuum to recover a brownish-purple gum(1.79 g). The gum was taken up in CH₂Cl₂ and filtered through silica(˜250 mL) on a sintered glass funnel. After eluting with CH₂Cl₂ toremove DMSO (2×250 mL), the pure product was eluted with 10% acetone inCH₂Cl₂ (2×250 mL). Fractions containing the product were combined,evaporated in vacuo and dried briefly under high vacuum to afford 1.29 gof 112a as a colorless foam in 83% yield. A small sample (˜100 mg) wasreserved, triturated with pentane, and dried to give a white crystallinesolid; m.p.=160-165° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3514,2938, 2824, 1724, 1616, 1521, 1520, 1447 and 1354 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz,CDCl₃): δ 0.250 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.894 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 3.137 (s, 3H,C17α-OCH₃), 3.435 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 3.998 (m, 4H, C3-OCH₂CH₂ O), 4.231and 4.363 (AB, 2H, J_(AB)=18.01 Hz, C21-CH₂), 4.250 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH),4.288 (br s, 1H, C5α-OH), 6.619 (d, 2H, J=8.85 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's)and 7.016 (d, 2H, J=8.85 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relativeintensity): 539 (M⁺, 71.4), 521 (34.8), 134 (52.9), 121 (100.0) and 99(23.5). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₂H₄₅NO₆: C, 71.21; H, 840; N, 2.60. Found: C,71.41; H, 8.60; N, 2.63.

Step 7. Preparation of the Target Compound 113a

To a solution of the 3-ketal-5α-hydroxy-20-one (112a, 1.20 gm 2.22 mmol)in THF (15.0 mL), was added glacial acetic acid (45.0 mL, 783 mmol),followed by H₂O (15.0 mL). The mixture was brought to reflux undernitrogen. After 1 hr., TLC (25% EtOAc in CH₂Cl₂) indicated the 3-ketalhad been hydrolyzed to give the slightly less polar ketone. The reactionwas allowed to cool to room temperature and left overnight undernitrogen. Concentrated NH₄OH (53.0 mL, 783 mmol) was added to neutralizethe reaction and additional NH₄OH was added to bring the mixture to pH7.0 (paper). The mixture was transferred to a separatory funnel andextracted into CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions were washed again withH₂O (1×) and brine (1×). Combined CH₂Cl₂ extracts were dried byfiltration through Na₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo to give 1.21 g of ayellow oil. The crude product was purified twice by flash chromatography(7.5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂). Fractions containing the pure product werecombined and evaporated to give a yellow gum. Trituration with heptaneproduced 350 mg of a pale yellow powder. All remaining material (impurefractions plus mother liquors) was combined and rechromatographed togive an additional 305 mg: Total yield was 655 mg of 113a in 61.7%yield; m.p.=132-136° C. HPLC analysis of 113a on a Waters Assoc. NovaPakC₁₈ column eluted with 30% 50 mM KH₂PO₄ (pH=3.0) in MeOH at a flow rateof 1 mL per min and at λ=302 nm indicated a purity of 97.9% with aretention time (t_(R)) of 7.87 min. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance):v_(max) 2946, 1724, 1665, 1599, 1518, 1445 and 1348 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz,CDCl₃): δ 0.322 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.904 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 3.173 (s, 3H,C17α-OCH₃), 3.453 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 4.234 and 4.375 (AB, 2H,J_(AB)=17.86 Hz, C21-CH₂), 4.367 (s, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.750 (s, 1H,C4-CH═), 6.634 (d, 2H, J=8.55 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 6.979 (d, 2H,J=8.55 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 477(M⁺, 83.2), 372 (10.3), 251 (17.1), 209 (20.4), 134 (35.3) and 121(100.0). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₀H₃₉NO₄: C, 75.44; H, 8.23; N, 2.93. Found:C, 75.54; H, 8.14; N, 2.94.

Example 28

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α,21-Dimethoxy-11β-[4-(N-pyrrolidino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(113b) (FIG. 8)

Step 1.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α-hydroxy-11β-[4-(N-pyrrolidino)phenyl]-17α,21-dimethoxy-19-norpregn-9-en-20-ol(111b)

A dry 100 mL 2-neck flask was equipped with a stirring bar, a refluxcondenser, and rubber septum. Magnesium (248 mg, 10.2 mmol) was added,and the entire apparatus was dried further under a stream of nitrogenwith a heat gun. After cooling slightly, one crystal of iodine wasadded.

The apparatus was allowed to cool completely and dry THF (5.0 mL) wasadded followed by one drop of 1,2-dibromoethane. A solution ofN-(4-bromophenyl)pyrrolidine (see, EXAMPLE 17, Step 3) (2.1 g, 9.27mmol) in THF (2.5 mL) which was warmed gently to achieve solution, wasadded via transfer needle and rinsed in with additional THF (2.5 mL).The mixture was brought to reflux and after 2 hr, almost all of themagnesium had been consumed. The cloudy, dark gray mixture was allowedto cool to room temperature and copper (I) chloride (101 mg, 1.02 mmol)was added as a solid. After stirring 1.5 hr at room temperature, asolution of the 5α,10α-epoxide (110, 1.3 g, 3.09 mmol) in THF (5.0 mL)which was heated gently to achieve a solution, was added via a transferneedle and rinsed in with additional THF (5.0 mL). After stirring 1 hrat room temperature, the reaction was quenched by the addition ofsaturated NH₄Cl (20 mL). Air was drawn through the mixture for ½ hr withvigorous stirring. The mixture was transferred to a separatory funnel,H₂O and ether were added, and the layers allowed to separate. Theorganic fraction was washed again with H₂O (1×), and brine (1×).Combined ether extracts (3×) were dried by filtration through Na₂SO₄,evaporated in vacuo, and dried further under high vacuum to recover agreenish-brown oil (2.47 g). Examination by TLC (15% acetone in CH₂Cl₂)revealed one major, slightly less polar product and a trace ofimpurities. Trituration with pentane or pentane/ether failed to producea solid. Purification by flash chromatography (15% acetone in CH₂Cl₂)gave 978 mg of pure 111b as a white foam. Fractions containing 410 mg ofthe impure product were rechromatographed to recover 152 mg of anadditional pure material 111b. The total yield of the purified product111b was 1.13 g as a white foam in 64.4% yield. Trituration of this foamwith pentane, followed by washing with heptane produced a white powder.The white powder was dried overnight in a drying pistol with benzene togive 727.1 mg of 111b in 41.5% yield; m.p.=135-143° C. FTIR (KBr,diffuse reflectance) v_(max) 3469, 2945, 2820, 1614, 1517, 1487, 1462,1442, 1371, 1239, 1192, 1122 and 1076 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ0.505 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 3.247 (m, 4H, pyrrolidyl α-CH₂), 3.288 (s, 3H,C17α-OCH₃), 3.364 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 3.339-3.448 (m, 2H, C21-CH₂), 3.808(m, 1H, C20-CH), 4.000 (m, 4H, C3-OCH₂CH₂ O), 4.12-4.21 (m, 1H,C11α-CH), 4.392 (s, 1H, C5α-OH), 6.460 (d, 2H, J=8.70 Hz, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 7.056 (d, 2H, J=8.70 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity): 567 (M⁺, 34.0), 549 (33.1), 442 (12.9),160 (30.3), 147 (100.0) and 99 (14.9). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₄H₄₉NO₆: C,71.93; H, 8.70; N, 2.47. Found: C, 72.03; H, 8.71; N, 2.46.

Step 2.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α-hydroxy-11β-[4-(N-pyrrolidino)phenyl]-17α,21-dimethoxy-19-norpregn-9-en-20-one(112b)

To a suspension of IBX (EXAMPLE 27, Step 6(a)) (501 mg, 1.79 mmol) indimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was added a solution of the Grignard adduct111b, 677 mg, 1.19 mmol) in DMSO (6.0 mL). Additional DMSO (2×2.0 mL)was used to rinse in residual 111b. Almost immediately upon addition of111b, a green solution formed which rapidly changed to purple. After 1hr, examination by TLC (15% acetone in CH₂Cl₂); aliquot was diluted withH₂O and extracted into EtOAc) revealed all of the starting material hadbeen cleanly converted to a single, less polar product. The reactionmixture was transferred to a 500 mL separatory funnel and diluted withH₂O and brine. The product was extracted into EtOAc (3×). The organicfractions were washed again with H₂O (1×), then brine (1×). CombinedEtOAc extracts (3×) were dried by filtration through anhydrous Na₂SO₄and evaporated in vacuo. The resulting residue was dried overnight underhigh vacuum to recover 0.85 g of a purple foam. Purification by flashchromatography (15% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) gave 494 mg of 112b as a paleyellow foam in 73.1% yield. A small amount was triturated with heptaneand dried in a drying pistol with benzene to give 51 mg of a pale yellowsolid for analysis; m.p.=120-125° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance):v_(max) 3540, 2946, 2830, 1722, 1666, 1613, 1517, 1488, 1462, 1445,1372, and 1188 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.264 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃),3.135 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃), 3.242 (m, 4H, pyrrolidyl α-CH₂), 3.433 (s, 3H,C21-OCH₃), 3.997 (m, 4H, C3-OCH₂CH₂ O), 4.232 and 4.381 (AB, 2H,J_(AB)=17.86 Hz, C21-CH₂), 4.366 (br s, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.747 (s, 1H,C4-CH═), 6.463 (d, 2H, J=8.40 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.002 (d, 2H,J=8.40 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 565(M⁺, 14.9), 547 (72.7), 503 (7.7), and 147 (100.0). Anal. Calcd. forC₃₄H₄₇NO₆.⅓C₃H₆O. 1/20C₇H₆: C, 72.51; H, 8.34; N, 2.33. Found: C, 72.67;H, 8.13; N, 2.31.

Step 3. Preparation of the Target Compound 113b

To a solution of the 3-ketal-20-ketone 112b, 443 mg, 0.78 mmol) in THF(5.0 mL), was added glacial acetic acid (15 mL, 261 mmol), followed bywater (5.0 mL). After 5 hr, TLC (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂; neutralized withconcentrated NH₄OH before developing) indicated that most of the 3-ketalhad been hydrolysed to give the slighly less polar ketone. The reactionwas allowed to continue overnight. The next morning, all of the startingmaterial had been converted to the product with only a trace ofimpurities. The reaction mixture was neutralized by the addition ofconcentrated NH₄OH (17.6 mL, 261 mmol, pH 7 by pH paper). The mixturewas transferred to a separatory funnel and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×).The organic fractions were washed again with H₂O (1×), and brine (1×).Combined CH₂Cl₂ extracts were dried by filtration through anhydrousNa₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo to give 450 mg of a yellow film. Thecrude product was purified twice by flash chromatography (10% acetone inCH₂Cl₂). Fractions containing highly pure product were combined andevaporated to give 311 mg of a pale yellow glass.

Trituration with heptane produced 264 mg of a pale yellow solid. At thispoint, inspection of this material by HPLC indicated a purity of 95.7%.The product was rechromatographed (7.5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) and againtriturated with heptane to produce 190 mg of a pale yellow powder. Noadditional purification was achieved.

Attempts to further purify the sample by normal phase HPLC were alsounsuccessful. Finally, the sample was recrystallized from hot heptaneand dried overnight in a drying pistol with heptane to give 97.1 mg of abeige powder in 24.4% yield; m.p. 122.5-126° C. Analysis by HPLC on aWaters Assoc. NovaPak C₁₈ column eluted with 30% 50 mM KH₂PO₄ [pH=3.0]in MeOH at a flow rate of 1 mL per min and at λ=302 nm, indicated apurity of 94.97% with a retention time (t_(R)) of 21.475 min. FTIR (KBr,diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 2944, 2826, 1726, 1667, 1614, 1518, 1488,1465, and 1379 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.339 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃),3.172 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃), 3.242 (m, 4H, pyrrolidyl α-CH₂), 3.450 (s, 3H,C21-OCH₃), 4.232 and 4.381 (AB, 2H, J_(AB)=18.01 Hz, C21-CH₂), 4.366 (brs, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.747 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.463 (d, 2H, J=8.55 Hz, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 6.962 (d, 2H, J=8.55 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity): 503 (M⁺, 59.3), 398 (4.9), 251 (8.6), 160(17.6) and 147 (100.0). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₂H₄₁NO₄.⅙C₇H₁₆.⅙H₂O: C,76.11; H, 8.47; N, 2.68 Found: C, 76.04; H, 8.40; N, 2.69.

Example 29

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α,21-Dimethoxy-11β-[4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(113c) (FIG. 8)

Step 1.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α-hydroxy-11β-[4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-17α,21-dimethoxy-19-norpregn-9-en-20-ol(111c)

A dry 50 mL 2-neck flask was equipped with a stirring bar, a refluxcondenser and a rubber septum. Magnesium (137 mg, 5.64 mmol) was addedand the entire apparatus was dried further under a stream of nitrogenwith a heat gun. After cooling slightly, one crystal of iodine wasadded. The apparatus was allowed to cool completely and dry THF (4 mL)was added followed by 1 drop of 1,2-dibromoethane. A solution ofN-(4-bromophenyl)piperidine (see, EXAMPLE 23, Step 1) (1.23 g, 5.13mmol) in THF (2.0 mL) was added via a transfer needle and rinsed in withadditional THF (2.0 mL). The reaction mixture was brought to reflux for1 hr. At that time, the Grignard reagent had formed as evidenced byconsumption of almost all of the magnesium and bleaching of the iodinecolor. The cloudy, dark gray mixture was allowed to cool to roomtemperature and copper (1) chloride (55.4 mg, 0.56 mmol) was added as asolid. After stirring 2 hr, a solution of the 5α,10α-epoxide (110, 1.0g, 2.38 mmol) in THF (4.0 mL; heated gently to achieve a solution) wasadded via transfer needle and rinsed in with additional THF (4.0 mL).After stirring 2 hr at room temperature, the reaction was quenched bythe addition of saturated NH₄Cl (16 mL). Air was drawn through themixture for ½ hr with vigorous stirring. The mixture was transferred toa separatory funnel, H₂O and ether were added, and the layers allowed toseparate. The organic fraction was washed with H₂O (1×), and brine (1×).Combined ether extracts (3×) were dried by filtration through anhydrousNa₂SO₄, evaporated in vacuo, and dried further under high vacuum torecover 1.73 g of an amber gum. Examination of the gum by TLC (15%acetone in CH₂Cl₂) revealed a single, slightly more polar product andtrace of the epoxide. Trituration with ether failed to produce a solid.The crude product was purified by flash chromatography (15% acetone inCH₂Cl₂). Fractions containing the pure product 111c were combined andevaporated to give 0.36 g of a white foam. Fractions containing theproduct plus the epoxide were rechromatographed to give 0.43 g ofadditional pure product 111c. The total yield of the purified productobtained was 0.79 g of 111c as a white foam in 56.7% yield. A smallamount was triturated with heptane and dried overnight in a dryingpistol with acetone to give 73.8 mg of a white powder (111c) which wasreserved for analysis; m.p.=162-171° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance):v_(max) 3470, 2934, 2868, 2816, 1610, 1511, 1440 and 1380 cm⁻¹. NMR (300MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.475 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 3.091 (m, 4H, piperidyl α-CH2),3.285 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃), 3.361 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 3.34-3.45 (m, 2H,C21-CH₂), 3.794 (m, 1H, C20-CH), 3.998 (m, 5H, C3-OCH₂CH₂ O and C20-OH),4.178 (br s, 1H, C11α-CH), 4.389 (s, 1H, C5α-OH), 6.810 (d, 2H, J=8.85Hz, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 7.073 (d, 2H, J=8.85 Hz, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 581 (M⁺, 39.0), 563(24.4), 456 (5.9), 174 (24.9), 161 (100.0) and 99 (12.1). Anal. Calcd.for C₃₅H₅₁NO₆: C, 72.26; H, 8.84; N, 2.41. Found: C, 72.31; H, 8.78; N,2.36.

Step 2.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α-hydroxy-11β-[4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-17α,21-dimethoxy-19-norpregn-9-en-20-one(112c)

To a suspension of IBX (0.49 g, 1.76 mmol) in DMSO (7.0 mL) was added asolution of the Grignard adduct (111c, 0.68 g, 1.17 mmol) in DMSO (6.0mL). Additional DMSO (2×2.0 mL) was used to rinse in residual 111c.Almost immediately upon addition of 111c, a purple solution formed. Thereaction was allowed to stir 2 hr at ambient temperature without anyprecautions against oxygen or moisture. At that time, the color hadturned from purple to deep red. Examination of this solution by TLC (15%acetone in CH₂Cl₂; aliquot was diluted with H₂O and extracted intoEtOAc) revealed all of the starting material had been cleanly convertedto a single, less polar product. The reaction mixture was transferred toa separatory funnel, H₂O and CH₂Cl₂ were added, and the layers allowedto separate. The organic fraction was washed again with H₂O (1×) andbrine (1×). Combined CH₂Cl₂ extracts (3×) were dried by filtrationthrough anhydrous sodium sulfate and evaporated in vacuo. The resultingresidue was dried overnight under high vacuum to recover 0.72 g of apurple gum. Purification by flash chromatography (15% acetone in CH₂Cl₂)gave 572 mg of a colorless gum. Trituration with heptane afforde 529 mgof 112c as a white solid in 77.8% yield. A small amount was reserved anddried further in a drying pistol with acetone for analysis;m.p.=107-111° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3534, 2931,2823, 1721, 1609, 1511 and 1450 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.234 (s,3H, C18-CH₃), 3.089 (m, 4H, piperidyl α-CH₂), 3.134 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃),3.429 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 3.995 (m, 4H, C3-OCH₂CH₂ O), 4.213 and 4.355(AB, 2H, J_(AB)=18.01 Hz, C21-CH₂), 4.212-4.306 (m, 2H, C11α-CH andC5α-OH), 6.803 (d, 2H, J=8.70 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.021 (d, 2H,J=8.70 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 579(M⁺, 38.7), 561 (16.1), 174 (23.7), 161 (100.0) and 99 (12.1) Anal.Calcd. for C₃₅H₄₉NO₆: C, 72.51; H, 8.52; N, 2.42. Found: C, 72.47; H,8.58; N, 2.35.

Step 3. Preparation of the Target Compound 113c

To a solution of the 3-ketal-20-ketone (112c, 471 mg, 0.81 mmol) in THF(5.0 mL) was added glacial acetic acid (15 mL, 261 mmol) followed by H₂O(5.0 mL). The mixture was brought to reflux under nitrogen. After 3 hr,TLC (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂; neutralized with NH₄OH before developing)indicated the 3-ketal had been hydrolyzed to give the slightly lesspolar ketone. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to roomtemperature and neutralized by the addition of concentrated NH₄OH (17.6mL, 261 mmol, pH 7 by a pH paper). The mixture was transferred to aseparatory funnel and extracted into CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractionswere washed again with H₂O (1×), and brine (1×). Combined CH₂Cl₂extracts were dried by filtration through anhydrous Na₂SO₄ andevaporated in vacuo to recover 426 mg of a yellow glass. This crudeproduct was purified by flash chromatography (5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂).Fractions containing highly pure product were combined and evaporated togive a pale yellow glass 113c. Trituration of 113c with heptane produceda pale yellow solid. The product was dried overnight in a drying pistolwith benzene to give 189.6 mg of 113c as a pale yellow solid in 45.7%yield; m.p.=108-112° C. Analysis by HPLC on a Waters Assoc. NovaPak C₁₈column eluted with 30% 50 mM KH₂PO₄, pH 3.0 in MeOH at a flow rate of 1mL per min and at λ=302 nm, indicated a purity of 97.22% with aretention time (t_(R)) of 3.73 min. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance):v_(max) 2935, 2822, 1723, 1664, 1609, 1511, 1488, 1451 and 1386 cm⁻¹.NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.304 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 3.100 (m, 4H, piperidylα-CH₂), 3.172 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃), 3.450 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 4.227 and4.370 (AB, 2H, J_(AB)=18.01 Hz, C21-CH₂), 4.366 (br s, 1H, C11α-CH),5.753 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.821 (d, 2H, J=8.70 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and6.985 (d, 2H, J=8.70 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relativeintensity): 517 (M⁺, 57.8), 412 (4.6), 318 (6.6), 174 (15.8), and 161(100.0). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₃H₄₃NO₄: C, 76.56; H, 8.37; N, 2.71. Found:C, 76.45; H, 8.37; N, 2.70.

Example 30

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α,21-Dimethoxy-11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(113d) (FIG. 8)

Step 1.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α-hydroxy-11β-[4-(2-methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)phenyl]-17α,21-dimethoxy-19-norpregn-9-en-20-ol(111d)

Magnesium turnings (289 mg, 11.89 mmol) were weighed into a 100 mL roundbottom two-neck flask equipped with a reflux condenser, a magneticstirrer, and a rubber septum. A small crystall of iodine was added andthe system was flushed with nitrogen and flame dried. After cooling toroom temperature, freshly distilled THF (10 mL) was introduced viasyringe followed by a small amount of dry dibromoethane (˜0.1 mL). Afterevidence of reaction was observed (disappearance of I₂ color, and bubbleformation on metal), a solution of the ketal of 4-bromoacetophenone(see, Example 20, Step 1) (2.89 g, 11.89 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) wasadded via syringe. The mixture was then stirred in a hot water bath for2 hr until the majority of the magnesium was consumed. After thereaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, solid copper (I)chloride (11.8 mg, 1.19 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred atroom temperature for ½ hr. The epoxide (110, 1.0 g, 2.38 mmol) in dryTHF (10 mL) was added via syringe. The reaction mixture was stirred atroom temperature for 1 hr then quenched with the addition of saturatedNH₄Cl solution (˜20 mL), and the mixture was stirred at room temperaturefor ½ hr while air was drawn through the reaction mixture to oxidizeCu(I) to Cu(II). The contents of the flask were diluted with water (˜100mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic extracts were washedwith saturated NH₄Cl solution (1×), water (1×) and brine (1×), thendried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated in vacuoto yield 4.3 g of oil. This was purified on a flash column (10% acetonein CH₂Cl₂) to yield 850 mg of 111d as a white foam which was trituratedwith ether to produce a white crystalline solid in 61.2% yield;m.p.=145-150° C. (Material changed to amber gel) and gel melts at173-177° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3461, 2946, 2877,2812, 1663, 1602, 1540, 1505, 1457 and 1372 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃):δ 0.443 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.636 (s, 3H, CH₃ of acetophenone ketal),3.289 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃), 3.358 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 3.741-4.015 (m, 8H,C3- and C11β-4-acetyl ketals), 4.244 (br s, 1H, C11α-CH), 7.165-7.327(dd, 4H, aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 584 (M⁺).Anal. Calcd. for C₃₄H₄₈O₈: C, 69.86; H, 8.22. Found: C, 69.63; H, 8.28.

Step 2.3,3-Ethylenedioxy-5α-hydroxy-11β-[4-(2-methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)phenyl]-17α,21-dimethoxy-19-norpregn-9-en-20-one(112d)

Under nitrogen, IBX (1.149 g, 4.104 mmol) was dissolved in DMSO (8 mL)over a period of 10 min. A solution of the Grignard product (111d, 800mg, 1.368 mmol) in DMSO (8 mL) was added via pipette to the abovesolution and the reaction mixture stirred at room temperature for ½ hr.At that time, TLC (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂; aliquot was diluted in waterand extracted into EtOAc) showed the starting material had beenconverted to a single less polar product. The reaction was diluted withH₂O (˜150 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic layers werewashed with H₂O (1×) and brine (1×), dried over anhydrous sodiumsulfate, filtered and concentrated in vacuo to give 820 mg of 112d as anoff-white foam. This was purified on a flash column (10% acetone inCH₂Cl₂). The product was originally obtained as a foam and wastriturated with pentane and dried in vacuo to yiled 540 mg of 112d as awhite solid in 73% yield; m.p.=102-106° C. (shrinkage to an amber gel);111-113° C. (gel bubbles); 123-133° C. (gel melts). FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance): v_(max) 3526, 2939, 2884, 2825, 1722, 1665 and 1604 cm⁻¹.NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.190 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.625 (s, 3H, CH₃ ofacetophenone ketal), 3.146 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃), 3.445 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃),3.742 and 4.015 (m, C3 and C11β-4-acetylphenyl ketals), 4.310 (d, 1H,C11α-CH), 7.119-7.332 (dd, 4H, aromatic-CH's) MS (EI) m/z (relativeintensity): 582 (M⁺). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₄H₄₆O₈: C, 70.08; H, 7.96Found: C, 70.11; H, 8.01. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3526,2939, 2884, 2825, 1722, 1665 and 1604 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ0.190 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.625 (s, 3H, CH₃ of acetophenone ketal), 3.416(s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃), 3.445 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 3.742 and 4.015 (m, C3 andC11β-4-acetylphenyl ketals), 4.310 (d, 1H, C11α-CH), 7.119-7.332 (dd,4H, aromatic-CH). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 582 (M⁺). Anal.Calcd. for C₃₄H₄₆O₈: C, 70.08; H, 7.96 Found: C, 70.11; H, 8.01.

Step 3. Preparation of the Target Compound 113d

Nitrogen was bubbled through a mixture of EtOH (925 mL) and 8.5%sulfuric acid for ½ hr to remove oxygen. The 20-ketone (112d, 520 mg,0.892 mmol) was added as a solid with stirring to the above solution.The mixture was put into an oil bath preheated to 95° C. and wasrefluxed under nitrogen for 1 hr. The reaction mixture was cooled in anice bath and quenched with saturated K₂CO₃ solution (pH≅10), dilutedwith water (˜125 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organicfractions were washed with water and brine, dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄,filtered and concentrated in vacuo to give 460 mg of the crude product.Flash chromatography (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) gave 377 mg of an off-whitepale yellow solid. This was crystallized from a mixture of distilledether and CH₂Cl₂ to yield 360 mg of 113d in 81% yield as a whitecrystalline solid in two batches. The product 113d retained CH₂Cl₂ andrequired extreme drying: m.p.=133-136° C. (foams) and 172-178° C. (foammelts). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): ν_(max) 2942, 1719, 1681, 1665,1600, 1409, 1359 and 1272 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.264 (s, 3H,C18-CH₃), 2.571 (s, 3H, CH₃ of acetophenone ketal), 3.185 (s, 3H,C17α-OCH₃), 3.449 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 4.183 and 4.385 (dd, 2H, C21-CH₂—),4.456 and 4.481 (d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.90 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 7.247-7.7883(dd, 4H, aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 476 (M⁺, 35),403 (93), 371 (100), 331 (67) and 91 (26). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₀H₃₆O₅: C,75.63; H, 7.56. Found: C, 74.78; H, 7.58.

Example 31

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Acetoxy-11β-[4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(123a):

Step 1. 17α-Hydroxy-21-chloro-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (115)

The 3-ketal cyanohydrin (98, 50 g, 73.22 mmol) was magnetically stirredwith freshly distilled THF (550 mL) under nitrogen at room temperature.4-Dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) (4.47 g, 36.59 mmol) was added as asolid. Freshly distilled Et₃N (27.60 mL, 197.68 mmol) followed byfreshly distilled chloro-(chloromethyl)dimethylsilane (25.1 mL, 190.36mmol) was added via syringe. The reaction was allowed to stir overnightat room temperature. The next day TLC on silica (2% acetone in CH₂Cl₂)showed all starting material had been converted to the silyl ether. Thereaction mixture was cooled to −78° C. in a dry ice bath withisopropanol, and then diluted with THF (800 mL). Lithiumdiisopropylamide (LDA) (2.0 M, 300 mL, 600 mmol) was added dropwise tothe reaction via an additional funnel over a period of 45 min. Onceaddition was complete, the reaction was stirred for 1.5 hr at −78° C.HCl (4 N, 1250 mL, 5 mol) was added via the addition funnel. The dry icebath was removed, and the reaction was allowed to stir overnight at roomtemperature. The reaction mixture was then cooled to 0° C. andneutralized by the addition of concentrated NH₄OH (305 mL). The mixturewas transferred to a separatory funnel and extracted with EtOAc (3×),washed with H₂O (2×) and brine (1×). The organic fractions werecombined, filtered through Na₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo. The resultingsolid was triturated with ether (1000 mL), collected on a Buchnerfunnel, and washed with additional ether. After drying overnight invacuo, 38.90 g of 115 as a dark yellow solid was recovered in 76.61%yield. Analysis by TLC on silica (5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) showed thematerial was suitable to carry directly on to the next reaction;m.p.=204-207° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3465, 2946,1729, 1664, 1599 and 1573 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.833 (s, 3H,C18-CH₃), 4.352 and 4.655 (AB, 2H, J_(AB)=16.8 Hz, C21-CH₂) and 5.687(s, 1′H, C4-CH═) MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 350 (M⁺, 33.1), 348(100.0), 253 (63.7), 213 (71.5) and 91 (62.6).

Step 2. 17α-Hydroxy-21-acetoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (116)

The 21-chloro compound (115, 37.90 g, 108.64 mmol), KOAc (111.83 g,1139.63 mmol) and acetonitrile (927 mL) were mechanically stirred. Thesuspension was brought to reflux under nitrogen. After 2.5 hr, TLC onsilica (5% acetone in methylene chloride) indicated the reaction hadgone to completion. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to roomtemperature, and precipitated KCl was removed by filtration through asintered glass funnel. Acetonitrile was evaporated in vacuo, and theresulting residue was taken up in CH₂Cl₂ and H₂O. The mixture wastransferred to a separatory funnel, extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×), andwashed with H₂O (2×) and brine (1×). The organic fractions werecombined, filtered through Na₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo to give 36.26g of 116 in 89.61% crude yield. The solid material was taken up in hotacetone (150 mL) and CH₂Cl₂ (150 mL). The solution was scratched, seededand stored in the freezer for 4 hr. The crystals were then filteredthrough a Buchner funnel and dried in vacuo to recover 10.71 g of the17α-ol-21-acetate (116) in 52.14% yield. The mother liquor wasevaporated in vacuo and purified by flash column chromatography elutedwith 10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂. Fractions containing the 17α-ol-21-acetate(116) were combined and evaporated in vacuo to recover 2.58 g of agolden yellow solid in 12.61%. The total yield of the purified17α-ol-21-acetate (116) was 13.29 g of a golden yellow solid in 64.7%yield; m.p.=213-218° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3475,2947, 2951, 1744, 1720, 1646, 1606, 1578, 1367 and 1235 cm⁻¹. NMR (300MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.841 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.182 (s, 3H, C21-OAc), 4.868 and5.081 (AB, 2H, J_(AB)=17.4 Hz, C21-CH₂) and 5.683 (s, 1H, C4-CH═) MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity): 372 (M⁺, 78.3), 354 (9.7), 312 (75.6),253 (100.0) and 91 (69.3).

Step 3. 17α,21-Dihydroxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (117)

The 17α-ol-21-acetate (116) (35.15 g, 94.37 mmol) was suspended infreshly opened MeOH (2870 mL) and deoxygenated by bubbling nitrogenthrough the mixture for 45 min. KHCO₃ (deoxygenated, 0.5 M, 283 mL,141.74 mmol) was added, and the suspension was mechanically stirred andbrought to reflux under nitrogen. After 10 minutes at reflux, TLC onsilica (5% isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂) showed the reaction to be complete.The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, neutralized by theaddition of HOAc (8.15 mL), and MeOH was evaporated in vacuo. Thereaction mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×), and washed with H₂O(2×) and brine (1×). The combined organic fractions were filteredthrough Na₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo to recover 29.83 g of the solidin 95.7% yield. The solid was taken up in acetone with a small amount ofCH₂Cl₂. The solution was scratched, seeded and stored in the freezer for1 hr. The resulting crystals were collected on a Buchner funnel, rinsedwith acetone and dried in vacuo to recover the first crop. The motherliquor was concentrated and stored in the freezer overnight to afford asecond crop of crystals. The combined solid recovered was 16.15 g in51.8% crude yield. The mother liquors were evaporated in vacuo andpurified by flash column chromatography eluted with 5% isopropanol inCH₂Cl₂. Fractions containing the diol (117) were combined and evaporatedin vacuo to recover 4.86 g. The total yield of 117 was 19.75 g of alight yellow solid in 76.7%; m.p.=197-204° C. FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance): v_(max) 3917, 2954, 2869, 1715, 1635, and 1590 cm⁻¹. NMR(300 MHZ, CDCl₃): δ 0.827 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 4.323 and 4.690 (AB, 2H,J_(AB)=19.81 Hz, C21-CH₂) and 5.686 (s, 1H, C4-CH═). MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 330 (M⁺, 100.0), 312 (10.1), 253 (61.7), 213(64.5), 174 (26.1) and 91. (38.5).

Step 4.3,20-bis-Ethylenedioxy-17α,21-Dihydroxy-19-norpregna-5(10),9(11)-diene(118)

The diol (117, 9.88 g, 29.89 mmol) and freshly opened ethylene glycol(750 mL) were magnetically stirred. p-Toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate(0.49 g, 2.60 mmol) was added to the suspension as a solid. The ethyleneglycol was distilled in vacuo at 81° C. under 2 mm Hg. After distillingfor 3 hr, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and poured intosaturated NaHCO₃ (250 mL) and H₂O (250 mL). The mixture was extractedwith CH₂Cl₂ (3×), washed with H₂O (2×) and brine (1×). The organicfractions were combined, filtered through sodium sulfate and evaporatedin vacuo to recover a solid. Analysis by TLC on silica (5% isopropanolin CH₂Cl₂) showed all of the starting material to be converted to an85:15 mixture of 3,20-diketal to 3-ketal with a small amount ofby-product. The resulting solid was triturated with ether, collected ona Buchner funnel, washed with additional ether and dried in vacuo torecover 6.46 g of 118 in 51.64% yield. The mother liquor was evaporatedin vacuo and purified through flash chromatography eluting with 4%isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂. This recovered 0.6 g of the light beige, soliddiketal in 4.8% yield. The total yield of the solid diketal (118) was7.06 g of a light beige solid in 56.44% yield; m.p.=173-176° C. FTIR(KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3452, 2892, 1652, 1436, 1370, 1223and 1055 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.795 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 3.686 and3.894 (AB, 2H, J_(AB)=12.61 Hz, C21-CH₂), 3.987 (s, 4H, C3-OCH₂CH₂ O—),4.130 (m, 4H, C20-OCH₂CH₂ O—) and 5.555 (br s, 1H, C11-CH═). MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 418 (M⁺, 5.6), 400 (0.7), 387 (3.9), 314 (3.5),211 (4.6) and 103 (100.0).

Step 5.3,20-bis-Ethylenedioxy-17α-hydroxy-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-5(10),9(11)-diene(119)

To a solution of the diketal (18, 0.5 g, 1.19 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (50 mL)was added 1,8-bis-(dimethylamino)naphthalene (“Proton Sponge”, 1.28 g,5.97 mmol) followed by trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate (0.88 g, 5.97mmol). The mixture was mechanically stirred in an ice bath undernitrogen. The ice bath was allowed to melt to bring the reaction to roomtemperature. The reaction mixture was stirred for 3 hr, at which timeTLC (5% isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂) indicated the reaction had gone tocompletion. The mixture was poured into a separatory funnel and washedwith H₂O (2×). The CH₂Cl₂ extracts (3×) were combined, filtered throughNa₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo. The resulting residue was taken up inEtOAc, washed with ice-cold 1 N HCl (2×), H₂O (1×), saturated NaHCO₃(1×), H₂O (1×), and brine (1×). Combined EtOAc fractions (3×) werefiltered through Na₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo to give 0.5 g of 119 asa yellow foam in 97.14% yield. The material was of adequate purity tocarry onto the subsequent epoxidation. The reaction was repeated toproduce a total of 13.57 g of the 21-methoxy compound 119). NMR (300MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.798 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 3.415 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 3.546and 3.715 (AB, 2H, J_(AB)=10.51 Hz, C21-CH₂), 3.985 (s, 4H,C3-OCH₂CH₂O—), 4.05 (m, 4H, C20-OCH₂CH₂ O—) and 5.54 (br s, 1H,C11-CH═). Decomposition of analytical sample precluded further analysis.

Step 6.3,20-bis-Ethylenedioxy-5α,10α-epoxy-17α-hydroxy-21-methoxy-19-norpregn-9(11)-ene(120)

Hexafluoroacetone trihydrate (6.49 mL, 46.64 mmol) and CH₂Cl₂ (100 mL)were mechanically stirred vigorously at 4° C. Solid Na₂HPO₄ (3.67 g,25.91 mmol) and 30% H₂O₂ (7.01 mL, 68.39 mmol) were added and stirredfor 15 minutes at 4° C. A cold solution of the 21-methoxy compound (119,13.45 g, 31.09 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (100 mL) was added to the mixture via anadditional funnel over a period of 1 hr. The reaction mixture wasallowed to stir overnight at 4° C. Examination by TLC (25% EtOAc inCH₂Cl₂) showed all of the starting material had been converted to amixture of the α and β epoxides in about a 2:1 ratio. The mixture wastransferred to a separatory funnel and washed with 10% Na₂SO₃ (1×),saturated NaHCO₃ (1×) and H₂O (1×). Combined CH₂Cl₂ extracts (3×) werefiltered through Na₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo to recover 14.06 g ofthe epoxide (120) as a white foam in quantitative yield. The 2:1 mixtureof α- and β-epoxides was used directly for the subsequent Grignardreaction. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.700 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 3.407 (s, 3H,C21-OCH₃), 3.539 and 3.692 (AB, 2H, J_(AB)=10.51 Hz, C21-CH₂), 4.051 (m,8H, C3- and C20-OCH₂CH₂ O—), 5.819 (br s, 0.3H, C11-CH═ of β-epoxide),and 5.997 (br s, 0.6H, C11-CH═ of α-epoxide). Decomposition ofanalytical sample precluded further analysis.

Step 7.3,20-bis-Ethylenedioxy-5α,17α-dihydroxy-11β-[4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-21-methoxy-19-norpregn-9-ene(121a)

Magnesium (1.27 g, 52.25 mmol), a crystal of iodine, dry THF (55 mL),and one drop of 1,2-dibromoethane were stirred together in dry glasswareover nitrogen. A solution of N-(4-bromophenyl)piperidine (see, EXAMPLE23, Step 1) (13.80 g, 57.48 mmol) in dry THF (45 mL) was added to thereaction flask, then rinsed in with an additional 10 mL of THF. Themixture was heated until all of the magnesium metal was gone. Thereaction was allowed to reflux for 1.5 hr, and then cooled to roomtemperature. Copper (I) chloride (0.57 g, 5.75 mmol) was added andstirring continued for 1 hr. A solution of the epoxide (120, 4.69 g,10.45 mmol) in dry THF was added to the reaction and rinsed in with anadditional 10 mL of THF. The reaction was stirred under nitrogen, atroom temperature, for 1 hr. The reaction was quenched with saturatedNH₄Cl (138 mL). Air was drawn through the mixture with vigorous stirringfor 20 min. The mixture was transferred to a separatory funnel,extracted with ether (3×), washed with H₂O (2×) and brine (1×). Thecombined organic fractions were dried with Na₂SO₄ for ½ hr, andevaporated in vacuo to recover 12.97 g of the crude product. Analysis byTLC (20% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) showed many impurities. The crude materialwas triturated with pentane to recover 4.45 g of a pale green solid.Analysis by TLC (20% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) showed a small amount ofby-product still present. The precipitate was further purified by flashcolumn chromatography (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂). Fractions containing thepure Grignard adduct (121a) were combined and evaporated in vacuo torecover 2.56 g of an aqua-green solid in 40.17% yield. The motherliquors from the trituration were combined and evaporated in vacuo torecover 8.15 g of material. Purification of this material by flashcolumn chromatography (20% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) afforded 0.29 g of a greengum. All recovered products were combined and triturated with ether torecover a total of 2.16 g of Grignard adduct (121a in 33.9% yield;m.p.=218-220° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3508, 2940,1609 and 1509 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.449 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 3.094 (t,10H, —NC₅H₁₀), 3.437 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 3.989 (m, 10H, C3 andC20-OCH₂CH₂O— and C21-CH₂—), 6.822 (d, 2H, J=8.85, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's)and 7.067 (d, 2H, J=8.85 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relativeintensity): 609 (M⁺, 29.1), 591 (46.6), 364 (8.6), 174 (29.2), 161(100.0) and 117 (96.4). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₆H₅₁N₇/⅓H₂O: C, 70.22; H,8.46; N, 2.27. Found: C, 70.10; H, 8.33; N, 2.40.

Step 8.17α-Hydroxy-11β-[4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(122a)

A solution of the Grignard adduct (121a, 2.10 g, 3.44 mmol) in THF (20mL) was mechanically stirred under nitrogen at room temperature.Trifluoroacetic acid (60 mL, 764.26 mmol) and H₂O (20 mL) were added,and the mixture was stirred under nitrogen for 3 hr. Examination by TLC(20% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) showed the reaction had gone to completion. Thereaction mixture was cooled in an ice bath, and NH₄OH (51.46 mL) wasslowly added to neutralize the reaction to a pH of 7 by pH paper. Themixture was transferred to a separatory funnel, extracted with EtOAc(3×). The organic fractions were washed with H₂O (2×) and brine (1×).The combined EtOAc fractions were dried with Na₂SO₄ and evaporated invacuo to give 1.70 g of an amber foam. The crude product was purified byflash column chromatography (20% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) to recover 1.16 g of122a as a bright yellow foam in 66.95% yield; m.p.=211-216° C. FTIR(KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3429, 2941, 1721, 1648, 1601 and1511 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.391 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.979 (t, 10H,—NC₅H₁₀), 3.454 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 4.243 and 4.383 (AB, 2H, J_(AB)=17.71Hz, C21-CH₂—), 5.762 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.820 (d, 2H, J=8.55 Hz, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 6.980 (d, 2H, J=8.55 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity): 503 (M⁺, 57.9), 318 (5.8), 174 (12.3) and161 (100.0). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₂H₄₁NO₄.⅓H₂O: C, 75.42; H, 8.24; N,2.75. Found: C, 75.23; H, 8.04; N, 2.94.

Step 9 Preparation of the Target Compound 123a

A mixture of CH₂Cl₂ (50 mL), trifluoroacetic anhydride (11.70 g, 55.65mmol) and glacial acetic acid (3.35 g, 55.59 mmol) was stirred undernitrogen at room temperature for ½ hr. The mixture was cooled in an icebath, and p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (0.47 g, 2.45 mmol) wasadded. The 17α-OH (122a, 1.12 g, 2.22 mmol) dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (7.5 mL)was transferred to the reaction flask and then rinsed in with anadditional 8 mL of CH₂Cl₂. The reaction mixture was stirred at 0° C. for2 hr. Examination by TLC (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) showed the reaction hadgone to completion. The reaction was kept at 0° C. and diluted with H₂O(30 mL), then neutralized by the addition of NH₄OH (11.45 mL).Additional NH₄OH was added until the pH of 6-7 by pH paper was reached.The mixture was transferred to a separatory funnel, the layers allowedto separate and CH₂Cl₂ fractions then washed with H₂O (1×) and brine(1×). The organic fractions were filtered through Na₂SO₄ and evaporatedin vacuo to give 1.21 g of a dark yellow foam. The crude product waspurified by flash column chromatography (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) to give1.08 g of 123a as a bright yellow foam. The purified product was thentriutrated with pentane to give 0.92 g of 123a as a pale yellow powderin 76% yield; m.p.=142-144° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max)2941, 2360, 2338, 1737, 1664, 1608 and 1512 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.378(s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.105 (s, 3H, C17α-OAc), 3.095 (t, 10H, —NC₅H₁₀),3.413 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 4.099 and 4.307 (AB, 2H, J_(AB)=17.11 Hz,C21-CH₂—), 4.377 (d, 1H, J=6.60 Hz, C11α-CH), 5.779 (s, 1H, C4-CH═),6.810 (d, 2H, J=8.70 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 6.973 (d, 2H, J=8.70Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 545 (M⁺,34.5), 485 (8.6), 412 (2.2), 174 (10.1), 161 (100.0) and 105 (2.5).Anal. Calcd. for C₃₄H₄₃NO₅. 1/10H₂O: C, 74.59; H, 7.95; N, 2.56. Found:C, 74.58; H, 7.89; N, 2.65.

Example 32

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Acetoxy-11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(123b) (FIG. 9):

Step 1.3,20-bis-Ethylenedioxy-5α,17α-dihydroxy-11β-[4-(2-methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)phenyl]-21-methoxy-19-norpregn-9-ene(121b)

A 3-neck 1 L flask was euipped with a mechanical stirrer, an additionfunnel, and a reflux condenser and flame-dried under a stream ofnitrogen. Magnesium (3.90 g, 146 mmol) was added, followed by one iodinecrystal, 150 mL of dry THF, and 1-2 drops of 1,2-dibromoethane. Themixture was stirred under nitrogen and heated in a warm water bath, butno reaction occurred. 4-Bromoacetophenone ethylene ketal (see, EXAMPLE20, Step 1) (35.5 g, 146 mmol) was added as a solution in THF (100 mL)via the addition funnel and then rinsed in with additional THF (40 mL).Upon completion of addition, the mixture was heated to reflux toinitiate formation of the Grignard reagent. Heating was discontinued andthe mixture allowed to stir 1.5 hr as the water bath gradually cooled toroom temperature. Copper (I) chloride (1.59 g, 16.06 mmol) was added asa solid and stirring continued for another ½ hr. The mixture of epoxides(120, 13.11 g, 29.2 mmol, ˜66% α-epoxide) was added as a solution in THF(50 mL) via the addition funnel and rinsed in with additional THF (20mL). After stirring 1.5 hr at room temperature, TLC (20% acetone inCH₂Cl₂; quenched with saturated NH₄Cl and extracted into EtOAc)indicated the reaction was >95% complete. The reaction was quenched bythe addition of 200 mL of saturated NH₄Cl and air was drawn through themixture for ½ hr with vigorous stirring. Ether was added, the mixturewas transferred to a separatory funnel, and the layers allowed toseparate. The organic layer was washed with 10% NH₄Cl, H₂O and brine.Combined ether extracts (3×) were filtered through Na₂SO₄ and evaporatedin vacuo to give 35.23 g of the crude product (121b). Purification byflash column chromatography (20% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) afforded 7.24 g of apale foam. Trituration of this foam with ether and pentane produced 5.93g of the product (121b) as a beige powder in 50.2% yield (based on 66%of the mixture as α-epoxide). NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.4 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.63(s, 3H, CH₃ of C11β-4-C₆H₄C(O)CH₃), 3.45 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 3.57-4.40(m, 15H, C3-OCH₂CH₂ O—, C11β-OCH₂CH₂ O— and C20-OCH₂CH₂ O—, C11α-CH andC21-CH₂—), 7.2 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.83 (d, 2H, J=9Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 612 (M⁺,0.1), 594 (3.3), 549 (15.0), 459 (2.7), 117 (100.0) and 87 (74.7).Decomposition of the analytical sample precluded further analysis.

Step 2.17α-Hydroxy-11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(122b)

The Grignard adduct (121, 5.81 g, 9.48 mmol) was dissolved in THF (60mL) and stirred magnetically, under nitrogen, at room temperature.Trifluoroacetic acid (180 mL) was added followed by H₂O (60 mL). After1.5 hr, examination by TLC (20% acetone in CH₂Cl₂; neutralized withNH₄OH before developing) indicated all of the starting material had beenconverted to a slightly less polar product. The reaction mixture wasneutralized by the careful addition of NH₄OH (165 mL) via an additionfunnel. Enough additional NH₄OH was added to bring the pH to 7.0 by pHpaper. H₂O was added, the mixture was transferred to a separatoryfunnel, and extracted with EtOAc. The organic fraction was washed againwith H₂O and brine. Combined EtOAc fractions (3×) were filtered throughNa₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo to give 6.60 g of a foam. Purification ofthe crude product by flash column chromatography (20% acetone in CH₂Cl₂)afforded a yellow solid (122b). Crystallization from a minimum amount ofhot EtOAc gave large, bright yellow crystals. The crystals werecollected on a Buchner funnel and dried overnight under high vacuum at70° C. to recover 2.84 g of 122b. A TLC of the mother liquors indicatedthey were pure enough to carry on to the subsequent reaction. The motherliquors were evaporated in vacuo and dried under high vacuum over theweekend to recover 0.46 g. The total yield of the 17α-OH (122b) was 3.3g as bright yellow crystals in 75.25% yield. A small amount of thecrystalline product was dried in vacuo at 110° C. over the weekend forpurposes of characterization. The crystals were fused and pulverizedwith a spatula; m.p.=105-109° C. (softens). Analysis by HPLC on aPhenomenex Prodigy 5 ODS-2 column (150×4.6 mm) eluted with 50% CH₃CN inH₂O at a flow rate of 1 mL per min and λ=302 nm indicated a purityof >99% with a retention time (t_(R)) of 5.02 min. FTIR (KBr, diffusereflectance): v_(max) 3444, 2944, 1722, 1662, 1602, 1407 1359 and 1271cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.33 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.57 (s, 3H,C11β-4-C₆H₄—C(O)CH₃), 3.47 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 4.23-4.47 (AB, 2H,J_(AB)=18 Hz, C21-CH₂—), 4.52 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.48 (s, 1H, C4-CH═),7.3 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.92 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 462 (M⁺, 100.0), 430(11.2), 389 (27.0), 346 (97.9) and 91 (22.3). Anal. Calcd. for C₂₉H₃₄O₅.9/20C₄H₈O₂: C, 73.66; H, 7.55. Found: C, 73.66; H, 7.29.

Step 3. Preparation of the Target Compound 123b

A mixture of trifluoroacetic anhydride (32.78 g, 156 mmol) and aceticacid (9.38 g, 156 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (100 mL) was allowed to stir V hr atroom temperature under nitrogen. The mixture was cooled to 0° C. in anice H₂O bath and p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (1.30 g, 6.86 mmol)was added as a solid. The 17α-OH (122b, 2.89 g, 6.24 mmol) was added asa solution in 25 mL of CH₂Cl₂ and rinsed in with additional CH₂Cl₂ (25mL). After 45 min, TLC (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) indicated the reactionhad gone to completion. The reaction was neutralized by the carefuladdition of NH₄OH (31.6 mL, 416 mmol). Additional NH₄OH was added tobring the pH to 7 by pH papaer. Water was added and the mixturetransferred to a separatory funnel. The organic fractions were washedwith H₂O and brine. Combined CH₂Cl₂ extracts (3×) were filtered throughNa₂SO₄ and evaporated in vacuo to recover 3.13 g of crude material.Purification by flash chromatography (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) provided1.56 g of a crystallizing oil. Additional fractions containing a smallamount of a less polar impurity were also combined and evaporated togive 1.04 g of an oil. Pure fractions were crystallized from a minimumamount of boiling EtOAc, triturated with pentane and dried 3 nights in adrying pistol at 110° C. to give 0.99 g of 123b as pale yellow crystals.The crystals fused at this temperature, but were readily pulverized foranalysis. Mother liquors were combined with the impure fractions andcrystallized from EtOAc to give an additional 0.9 g. Total yield of 123bwas 1.89 g as a pale yellow solid in 60.1% yield; m.p.=113° C.(softens).

Analysis by HPLC on a Phenomenex Prodigy 5 ODS-2 column (150×4.6 mm)eluted with 50% CH₃CN in H₂O at a flow rate of 1 mL per min and λ=302 nmindicated a purity of 99.7% with a retention time (t_(R)) of 7.69 min.FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 2942, 1730, 1680, 1602, 1432,1408, 1368 and 1266 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.33 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.10 (s,3H, C17α-OAc), 2.57 (s, 3H, C11β-C(O)CH₃), 3.42 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 4.07& 437 (AB, 2H, J_(AB)=18 Hz, C21-CH₂—), 4.50 (br d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.83(s, 1H, C4-CH═), 7.28 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.92 (d,2H, J=9 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 504(M⁺, 3.3), 447 (17.9), 389 (28.4), 371 (100.0) and 91 (13.8). Anal.Calcd: for C₃₁H₃₆O₆.⅙CH₂Cl₂.½H₂O: C, 70.92; H, 7.13. Found: C, 71.06; H,6.91.

Example 33

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Acetoxy-11β-{4-[2′-(N,N-dimethylamino)ethoxy]phenyl}-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(123c):

Step 1.3,20-bis-(Ethylenedioxy)-5α,17α-dihydroxy-11β-{4-[2′-(N,N-dimethylamino)ethoxy]phenyl}-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(121c)

Magnesium (0.58 g, 23.85 mmol), a crystal of iodine, distilled THF (27mL) and one drop of 1,2-dibromoethane were stirred together in dryglassware over nitrogen. A solution of 4-[2-(dimethylamino)ethoxy]phenylbromide (Robertson, et al., J. Org. Chem., 47:2387-2393 (1982)) (6.41 g,26.24 mmol) in distilled THF was added to the reaction flask, thenrinsed with an additional 5 mL of THF. The mixture was heated until allthe magnesium was gone. The reaction was allowed to reflux for 2 hr.,and then cooled to room temperature. Copper (I) chloride (0.26 g, 2.63mmol) was added and stirring continued for 1 hr. A solution of the5α,10α-epoxide (120, 14 g, 2.63 mmol) in distilled THF and rinsed withan additional 5 mL of THF. The reaction was stirred over nitrogen atroom temperature for 1 hr. After cooling the reaction flask in an icewater bath, the reaction was quenched with water (79 mL). Air was drawnthrough the mixture with vigorous stirring for 20 min. The mixture wastransferred to a separatory funnel, extracted with ether (3×), washedwith water (2×) and brine (1×). The combined organic fractions weredried over sodium sulfate for ½ hr. and evaporated in vacuo to recover3.21 g of a thick amber oil. Ether (50 mL) was added to this material,and a small precipitate was visible. The organic product was found toremain in the mother liquor. After removing the ether, the crudematerial was triturated with hexanes and a small amount of ether. Asmall precipitate formed, but once again the product was found in thefiltrate by TLC (10% isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂). The crude material of 1.27g recovered was a dark, amber oil. The material was further purified byflash column chromatography (10% isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂ with 0.1% Et₃N).All by-products were removed, and the product was flushed off the columnwith 10% isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂ with 1% Et₃N to recover 0.76 g of ayellow gum. The material was triturated with ether and a small amount ofCH₂Cl₂. After storing in the freezer overnight, a small precipitateformed, and the ether (containing the product) was decanted off toobtain 0.56 g of material. The crude product was further purified byanother flash column (10% isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂ with 1% Et₃N) to recover0.50 g of a yellow oil. This material was analyzed by HPLC on a NovaPakC₁₈ column eluted with 55% CH₃CN in H₂O with 0.05% Et₃N at a flow rateof 0.5 mL/min and at λ=280 nm and indicated a purity of 17.83%. Thematerial was then purified by prep HPLC on a Waters Assoc. Prep NovaPakHR C₁₈ (6μ) column (40×10 mm) eluted with 55% CH₃CN in H₂O with 0.05%Et₃N at a flow rate of 25 mL per min and at λ=280 nm. Further analysisby HPLC on a Waters Assoc. NovaPak C₁₈ column eluted with 55% CH₃CN inH₂O with 0.05% Et₃N at a flow rate of 0.4 mL per min and at λ=280 nmindicated a purity greater than 99.99% with t_(R) of 10.21 min. CH₃CNwas removed from the fraction containing the product, and the aqueouslayer with product material was extracted with EtOAc (3×). The organicfractions were then washed with H₂O (x) and brine (x), dried over Na₂SO₄and evaporated in vacuo to recover 0.35 g of white foam 121c) in 11.95%yield. A small amount of the material was triturated with pentane to useas the analytical sample, and the remainder of it was carried onto thehydrolysis; m.p.=179-183° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max)3508, 2942, 2894, 2818, 2772, 1610, 1580 and 1509 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHZ,CDCl₃): δ 0.443 (s, 3H, C18-Me), 3.435 (s, 3H, C21-OMe), 4.048 (m, 10H,C3- and C20-OCH₂CH₂O— and C21-CH₂), 6.803 (d, 2H, J=8.70 Hz,aromatic-CH's) and 7.099 (d, 2H, J=8.70 Hz, aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 614 (M⁺, 0.3), 595 (1.3), 568 (4.3), 550 (5.5),117 (20.1), 71 (3.6) and 58 (100.0).

Step 2.17α-Hydroxy-11β-{4-[2′-(N,N-dimethylamino)ethoxy]phenyl}-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(122c)

The Grignard product (121c, 0.30 g, 0.49 mmol) in THF (3 mL) wasmechanically stirred under nitrogen at room temperature. Trifluoroaceticacid (9 mL, 121.14 mmol) and water (3 mL) were added, and the mixturewas stirred for 2.5 hr under nitrogen. Examination by TLC (silica, 10%isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂ with 0.1% Et₃N) was difficult to analyze;therefore, the reaction was allowed to stir overnight at roomtemperature under nitrogen. Another TLC (silica, 10% isopropanol inCH₂Cl₂ with 0.1% Et₃N) was done, but the results were difficult to readdue to the fact that the product was still very polar. The reaction wasassumed to be complete and diluted with water (35 mL). The flask wasthen cooled in an ice bath, and a cold solution of 2M NaOH (61 mL) wasslowly added to neutralize the reaction to a pH of 7 (by pH paper),although the mixture quickly went to a pH of 12. The reaction mixturewas extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×) and washed with water (2×) and brine(1×). The combined organic fractions were filtered through sodiumsulfate and evaporated in vacuo to recover 0.19 g (0.38 mmol) of ayellow oil 122c. The crude product was purified by flash columnchromatography (20% isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂ with 0.2% Et₃N) to recover0.15 g of a yellow foam (122c). A small amount of the material wastriturated with pentane to use as the analytical sample, and theremainder of it was carried onto the acetylation; m.p.=78-82° C. FTIR(KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 2944, 1722, 1665, 1607, 1509, 1461and 1237 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHZ, CDCl₃): δ 0.376 (s, 3H, C18-Me), 3.454 (s,3H, C21-OMe), 5.770 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.821 (d, 2H, aromatic-CH's) and7.099 (d, 2H, aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 505 (M⁺,1.5), 473 (0.5), 436 (3.8), 72 (13.8) and 58 (100.0).

Step 3. Preparation of the Target Compound 123c

A mixture of CH₂Cl₂ (6 mL), trifluoroacetic anhydride (0.90 mL, 6.44mmol), and glacial acetic acid (0.37 mL, 6.44 mmol) were stirred at roomtemperature under nitrogen for ½ hr. The mixture was cooled in an icebath, and p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (0.05 g, 0.28 mmol) wasadded. The 17-OH (122c, 0.13 g, 0.26 mmol) dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL)was transferred to the reaction flask and then rinsed with an additional0.5 mL of CH₂Cl₂. The reaction was stirred at 0° C. for 5 hr.Examination by TLC (20% isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂ with 0.2% Et₃N) showed thereaction had gone to completion. The ice bath was maintained and water(20 mL) was added. The reaction was neutralized by the addition of cold2 M NaOH (14 mL) until the pH of 7-8 (by pH paper) was reached. Themixture was transferred to a separatory funnel, the layers allowed toseparate, and CH₂Cl₂ fractions then washed with water (2×) and brine(1×). The organic fractions were filtered through sodium sulfate andevaporated in vacuo to recover 0.15 g of a dark, yellow foam. The crudeproduct was purified by flash column chromatography (20% 20% isopropanolin CH₂Cl₂ with 0.2% Et₃N) to give 0.08 g of a bright yellow foam. Thesepurified fractions were then triturated with ether to recover 0.02 g ofa pale yellow powder 123c). The mother liquor was further trituratedwith pentane to give an additional 0.04 g of 123c. Analysis by NMRshowed the material was contaminated with stop cock grease; thereforeall collected material was combined and further purified by flash columnchromatography (20% isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂ with 0.2% Et₃N) to give 0.05 gof a yellow powdery foam in 33.78% yield. This material was thentriturated with pentane to yield 0.03 g of a pale yellow powder 123c) in19.10% yield; m.p.=115-127° C. (sintered at 73-78° C.). FTIR (KBr,diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 2947, 1728, 1665, 1607 and 1509 cm⁻¹. NMR(300 MHZ, CDCl₃): δ 0.365 (s, 3H, C18-Me), 2.105 (s, 3H, C17-OAc), 2.332(s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 3.414 (s, 3H, C21-OME), 5.793 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.808(d, 2H, aromatic-CH's) and 7.030 (d, 2H, aromatic-CH's). Anal. Calcd.for C₃₃H₄₃NO₆.⅕H₂O: C, 72.10; H, 7.88; N, 2.55. Found: C, 71.63; H,7.91; N, 2.53.

Example 34 17α-Acetoxy-11β-{4-[2′-(N-piperidino)ethoxy]phenyl}-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (123d)

This procedure was similar to that employed for the production of 123c.

Step 1.3,20-bis-(Ethylenedioxy)-5α,17α-dihydroxy-1/1-{4-[2′-(N-piperidino)ethoxy]phenyl}-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (121d)

Magnesium (1.11 g, 45.59 mmol), a crystal of iodine, distilled THF (52mL, distilled over Na and benzophenone), and one drop of1,2-dibromoethane were stirred together in dry glassware over nitrogen.A solution of 4-[2-(N-piperidinophenyl)ethoxy]phenyl bromide (Lednicer,et al., J. Med. Chem., 8, 52-57 (1965) (14.26 g, 50.16 mmol) indistilled THF (50 mL) was added to the reaction flask, then rinsed withan additional 10 mL of THF. The mixture was heated until all of themagnesium was gone. The reaction was allowed to reflux for 2 hr., andthen cooled to room temperature. Copper (I) chloride (0.50 g, 5.03 mmol)was added and stirring continued for 1 hr. A solution of the epoxide(120, 7.50 g, 16.72 mmol) in distilled THF (74 ml) was transferred tothe reaction vessel. The reaction was stirred over nitrogen, at roomtemperature, for one hour. The reaction was cooled in an ice water bathand quenched with water (186 mL). Air was drawn through the mixture withvigorous stirring for 20 minutes. The mixture was transferred to aseparatory funnel, extracted with ether (3×), and washed with water (2×)and brine (1×). The combined, organic fractions were dried with sodiumsulfate for ½ hr, and evaporated in vacuo to recover 17.32 g (26.49mmol) of a thick amber oil. Analysis by TLC (silica, 10% isopropanol inmethylene chloride with a few drops of Et₃N) showed a very polar,streaking product. The entire crude material was carried directly on tothe hydrolysis. Due to the extreme polarity of the crude Grignardproduct, analytical work was not performed.

Step 2.17α-Hydroxy-11β-{4-[2′-(N-piperidino)ethoxy]phenyl}-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(122d)

The Grignard product (121d, 10.93 g, 16.72 mmol) dissolved in THF (103mL) was mechanically stirred over nitrogen at room temperature.Trifluoroacetic acid (307.10 mL, 4133.60 mmol, 13.46 M) and water (103mL) were added, and the mixture was stirred over nitrogen, at roomtemperature, overnight. The reaction was diluted with water (750 mL) andcooled in an ice water bath. Ice cold 4 M NaOH (1030 mL) was slowlyadded to neutralize the reaction to a pH of 7-8 (by pH paper). Themixture was transferred to a separatory funnel, extracted with methylenechloride (3×), and washed with water (2×) and brine (1×). The combinedmethylene chloride fractions were dried with sodium sulfate andevaporated in vacuo to recover 15.33 g of the crude 122d as a gold foamin 16.8% yield.

Step 3 Preparation of the Target Compound 123d

Treatment of the 17α-hydroxy compound 122d, 0.25 g, 0.46 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂with a mixed anhydride (11.28 mmol) prepared from trifluoroaceticanhydride, acetic acid and p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate in CH₂Cl₂at 0° C. for 4.5 hr and work up in the usual way followed bypurification of the crude product (123d) by Preparative HPLC on a WatersAssoc. Prep NovaPak HR C₁₈, 6 μm, 4×100 mm) eluted with 50% CH₃CN in H₂Owith 0.05% Et₃N at a flow rate of 25 mL per min and at 2=302 nm,provided 0.10 g of 123d as a light yellow powder in 9.4% yield;m.p.=85-89° C. (sintered at 74-78° C.). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance):v_(max) 2938, 1730, 1662, 1608 and 1509 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHZ, CDCl₃): δ0.369 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.106 (s, 3H, C17α-OAc), 2.501 (m, 4H,piperidino α-CH₂), 2.748 (t, 2H, OCH₂CH₂N), 3.413 (s, 3H, 21-OCH₃),4.055 (t, 2H, OCH₂CH₂N), 5.787 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.783 (d, 2H, J=9.00 Hz,aromatic-CH's), and 7.010 (d, 2H, J=9.00 Hz, aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 590 (M⁺, 87), 445 (41), 371(100), 355 (71), 299(39) and 269 (26). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₆H₄₇NO₆ 75/100 H₂O: C, 73.15; H,8.04; N, 2.37. Found: C, 72.96; H, 8.11; N, 2.27. Analysis by HPLC on aWaters Assoc. NovaPak C₁₈ column eluted with 50% CH₃CN in H₂O with 0.05%Et₃N at a flow rate of 1 mL per min and at λ=302 nm indicated a purityof 99.16% of 123d with t_(R) of 9.95 min.

Example 35

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α,21-Diformyloxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(139):

Under nitrogen, a solution of the diol (124, 1.0 g, 2.22 mmol) in formicacid (96%, 50 mL) was treated with perchloric acid (Oliveto, et al., J.Am. Chem. Soc., 77:3564-3567 (1955)) (70%, 0.5 mL, 5.816 mmol) and thereaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. Analysis byTLC (10% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) of a small aliquot neutralized with cold NH₄OHand extracted with EtOAc indicated absence of the starting material andformation of two less polar products in roughly equal proportions. Thereaction was diluted with H₂O (˜200 mL), cooled in an ice bath, andcarefully adjusted to a pH of 7.5 with concentrated NH₄OH. The resultingsuspension was extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions werewashed with H₂O (2×), filtered through anhydrous sodium sulfate,combined and concentrated in vacuo to give 1.3 g of the residue as ayellow foam. Analysis by NMR indicated the crude mixture to consistmainly of the 17α-hydroxy-21-formate (140) and the desired17α,21-diformate (139) in approximately a 45:55 ratio. Separation of thetwo products was accomplished by flash chromatography (8% acetone/CH₂C2)to afford 0.62 g of the diformate (139) and 0.49 g of the monoformate(140). The diformate (139) was taken up in ether, blown down andtriturated with pentane to give 0.53 g of a yellow solid inidcated byHPLC on a Waters NovaPak C₁₈ column elued with CH₃CN/0.05 M KH₂PO₄(45:55) (pH=3.0) at a flow rate of 1 mL per min and λ=302 nm) to be only97% pure. This material was rechromatographed using 7% acetone/CH₂Cl₂and reprecipitated from Et₂O/pentane to give 0.235 g of the purediformate (139) as a yellow amorphous solid in 20.9% yield; m.p.=softensat 110-112° C. Analysis by HPLC on a Waters NovaPak C₁₈ column elutedwith CH₃CN/0.05 M KH₂PO₄ (45:55) [pH=3.0] at a flow rate of 1 mL per minand λ=302 nm) to be 98.6% pure with a retention time (t_(R)) of 6.56min. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 2948, 1726, 1662, 1612,1518, and 1169 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.460 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.908 (s,6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 4.407 (d, 1H, J=7.2 Hz, C11α-CH), 4.816 and 5.070 (dd,2H, C21-CH₂—), 5.781 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.651 (d, 2H, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's), 7.006 (d, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's), 8.029 (s, 1H,C17α-OC(O)H) and 8.165 (s, 1H, C21-OC(O)H). MS (EI) m/z (relativeintensity): 505 (M⁺, 21.0), 459 (8.6), 431 (7.6) 134 (13.1) and 121(100). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₄H₄₄N₂O₆.⅕H₂O: C, 70.76; H, 701; N, 2.75.Found: C, 70.76; H, 7.01; N, 2.85. Trituration of the monoformatefraction from the chromatography afforded 0.265 g of compound 140 as alight yellow solid. NMR indicates the presence of 20-formate 140 at8.172 ppm. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.39 (s, 3H, —C18-CH₃), 2.902 (s, 6H,—N(CH₃)₂), 4.384 (d, 1H, J=6.9 Hz, C11α-CH), 5.031 and 5.193 (dd, 2H,J=17.71 Hz, C21-CH₂—), 5.759 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.656 (d, 2H, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's), 7.015 (d, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's), and 8.172 (s, 1H,C21-OC(O)H).

Example 36

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Acetoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-propionyloxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(126a) (FIG. 11):

Step 1.17α-Hydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-propionyloxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(125a)

Under nitrogen, a solution of the diol (124, 1.0 g, 2.22 mmol) in drybenzene (20 mL) and pyridine (1 mL, 12.4 mmol) was treated withpropionyl chloride (0.22 mL, 2.53 mmol). This addition caused animmediate precipitation of a large gummy mass, probably due to formationof a mixture of the hydrochloride salts of starting material andproduct. Since the dimethylaminophenyl moiety is probably more basicthan pyridine, any HCl formed during the reaction would protonate the11β-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl) group rather than pyridine. Addition oftriethylamine (1 mL, 7.11 mmol) resulted in dissolution of theprecipitated mass with formation of a small amount of solid precipitate.The reaction mixture was then stirred at room temperature and monitoredby TLC (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) which indicated about a 60% reactionafter 1 hr. Additional propionyl chloride (0.22 mL, 2.53 mmol) wasintroduced and the reaction was stirred a further 1 hr at roomtemperature. Analysis by TLC at that time indicated a complete reaction.The reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo under a current ofnitrogen and the residue was diluted with H₂O. The mixture was extractedwith CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions were washed with H₂O (2×), brine(1×), then concentrated, dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄, filtered andconcentrated in vacuo to give 1.2 g of the residue as a yellow foam.This material was purified by flash chromatography (10% acetone inCH₂Cl₂) to give 1.1 g of the 21-propionyloxy-17α-ol (125a).Crystallization of this material from EtOAc/heptane afforded 0.43 g ofthe pure 125a in 67% yield. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max)3331, 2940, 1749, 1734, 1640, 1612 and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃):δ 0.37 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.17 (t, 3H, J=7.5 Hz, propionyl CH₃), 2.90 (s,6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 4.40 (br d, J=6 Hz, C11α-CH), 5.03 (dd, 2H, J₁=30, J₂=18Hz, C21-CH₂ —O), 5.77 (br s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.67 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 7.07 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's).

Step 2. Preparation of the Target Compound 126a

Under nitrogen, trifluoroacetic anhydride (11.18 g, 53.2 mmol), glacialacetic acid (3.26 g, 54.2 mmol) and dry CH₂Cl₂ (35 mL) were combined andstirred at room temperature for ½ hr. The mixture was cooled to 0° C. inan ice bath and toluenesulfonic aicd monohydrate (0.5 g, 2.63 mmol) wasadded. A solution of the 21-propionyloxy-17α-ol (125a, 1.28 g, 2.61mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ was then introduced and the mixture stirred at 0° C.and monitored by TLC (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) which indicated a completereaction after 2 hr. The ice-bath was removed and the reaction wasallowed to warm to room temperature. The mixture was then diluted withH₂O (100 mL), adjusted to a pH of 6.5 with concentrated NH₄OH solutionand extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions were washed withH₂O (2×), brine (1×), combined, filtered through sodium sulfate andconcentrated in vacuo to give 1.1 g of the residue. Purification viaflash chromatography (5% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) followed by trituration withheptane gave 0.49 g of the pure 21-propionyloxy-17α-acetate (126a) as alight yellow amorphous solid in 55% yield; m.p.=softens at 86° C. NMR(CDCl₃): δ 0.43 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.11 (t, 3H, J=8 Hz, propionyl CH₃),2.07 (s, 3H, OAc), 2.89 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 4.43 (br d, C11α-CH, J=6 Hz),4.85 (dd, 2H, J₁=28 Hz, J₂=17 Hz, C21-CH₂ —O—), 5.77 (s, 1H, C4-CH═),6.63 (d, 2H, J=7.8 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.0 (d, 2H, J=7.8 Hz,2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₃H₄₁NO₆: C, 72.37; H, 7.55; N,2.56. Found: C, 72.23; H, 7.71; N, 2.50.

Example 37

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Acetoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-(2′-methoxyacetyl)oxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione126b (FIG. 11):

Step 1.17α-Hydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-(2′-methoxyacetyl)oxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(125b)

Under nitrogen, a solution of the 17α,21-diol (124, 1.0 g, 2.22 mmol),pyridine (1 mL, 12.41 mmol) and triethylamine (1 mL, 7.11 mmol) in drybenzene (40 mL) was treated with methoxyacetyl chloride (0.5 mL, 5.47mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 hr,after which time TLC (5% isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂) indicated a completereaction. Solvents were removed in vacuo under a current of nitrogen andthe residue was diluted with H₂O (˜50 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3×). The organic fractions were washed with H₂O (3×), filtered throughanhydrous Na₂SO₄, combined and concentrated in vacuo to give 1.4 g ofthe residue as a yellow solid. This material was purified by flashchromatography (3% isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂) to give 1.05 g of the productas a yellow foam. Crystallization from ether containing a small amountof CH₂Cl₂ gave 0.73 g of the pure 21-(2′-methoxy)-acetyloxy-derivative125b as an off-white solid in 62.9% yield; m.p.=197-199° C. FTIR (KBr,diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3329, 2948, 2888, 1754, 1729, 1637, 1602and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.399 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.906 (s,6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 3.488 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 4.181 (s, 2H, C21-OC(O)CH₂ —),4.384 (d, 1H, J=4.384, C11α-CH), 4.975 and 5.234 (both d, 2H, J=17.4 Hz,C21-CH₂), 5.760 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.654 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 7.012 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI)m/z (relative intensity): 521 (M⁺, 26.4), 431 (7.1), 134 (17.3) and 121(100.0). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₁H₃₉NO₃: C, 71.38; H, 7.54; N, 2.69. Found:C, 71.48; H, 7.59; N, 2.64.

Step 2. Preparation of the Target Compound 126b

Under nitrogen, trifluoroacetic anhydride (2.98 g, 14.16 mmol), glacialacetic acid (0.84 g, 13.98 mmol) and dry CH₂Cl₂ (5 mL) were combined andstirred at room temperature for ½ hr. Toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate(0.15 g, 0.79 mmol) was added and the mixture cooled to 0° C. in an icebath. A solution of the 21-(2′-methoxy)acetyloxy-17α-ol (125b, 0.612 g,1.173 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) was added and the reaction was stirredat 0° C. and monitored by TLC (3% isopropanol in CH₂Cl₂) which indicateda complete reaction after 4 hr. The mixture was diluted with H₂O (˜10mL), stirred at 0° C. for another 15 minutes, then carefully neutralizedwith dropwise addition of concentrated NH₄OH solution (˜3 mL). Themixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions werewashed with H₂O (2×) and brine (1×), filtered through anhydrous Na₂SO₄,combined and concentrated in vacuo to give 0.72 g of the residue as anoil. This material was purified via flash chromatography (20% EtOAc inCH₂Cl₂) to give 0.34 g of 126b as a yellow foam. Trituration of thismaterial with pentane gave 0.26 g of the pure title compound (126b) as alight yellow amorphous solid in 39.3% yield; m.p.=110-113° C.

Analysis of 126b by HPLC on a Waters NovaPak, C₁₈ column, eluted with0.05 M KH₂PO₄ buffer [pH=3.0]/MeOH, 35:65 at a flow rate of 1 mL per minand at =302 mm indicated this material to be >99% pure with a retentiontime (t_(R)=6.04 min). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 2947,1766, 1737, 1663, 1612 and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.447 (s,3H, C18-CH₃), 2.129, (s, 3H, C17α-OAc), 2.907 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 3.473(s, 3H, C21-OC(O)CH₂OCH₂ ), 4.176 (s, 2H, C21-OC(O)CH₂ —), 4.392 (d, 1H,J=6 Hz, C11α-CH), 4.792 and 5.029 (both d, 2H, J=17.4 Hz, C21-CH₂),5.777 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.644 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and7.002 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 2′,6′-aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relativeintensity): 563 (M⁺, 42.8), 503 (12.6), 134 (17.2) and 121 (100.0).Anal. Calcd. for C₃₃H₄₁NO₇: C, 70.32; H, 7.33; N, 2.48. Found: C, 70.14;H, 7.59; N, 2.41.

Example 38

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Acetoxy-21-hydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione-21-methylcarbonate (126c (FIG. 11):

Step 1.17α,21-Dihydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione-21-methylcarbonate (125c)

The 17α,21-diol (10) (124, 250 mg, 1.80 mmol) was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂(10 mL) and pyridine (0.2 mL) was added followed by methyl chloroformate(0.245 g, 2.59 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 20min. TLC after 5 min showed the reaction complete. The mixture wasevaporated in vacuo and dissolved in CH₂Cl₂. The dichloromethane waswashed with H₂O (2×), brine and dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄. The solventwas evaporated in vacuo. Benzene was added and evaporated to removetraces of pyridine. CH₂Cl₂ was added and evaporated to give 273 mg ofthe 17α-hydroxy-21-methyl carbonate (125c) in 29.9% yield.

NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.381 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.899 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 3.820(s, 3H, C21-OC(O)OCH₃ ), 4.369 (m, 1H, C11α-CH), 4.914 and 5.178 (dd,2H, C21-CH₂—), 5.747 (br s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.644 (d, 2H, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 7.002 (d, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's).

Step 2. Preparation of the Target Compound 126c

CH₂Cl₂ (15 mL) was stirred at room temperature and trifluoroacetic acidanhydride (2.29 g, 10.9 mmol) and acetic acid (0.714 g, 11.8 mmol) wereadded. The mixture was stirred at room temperature in a nitrogenatmosphere for ½ hr. p-Toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (1.90 g, 1.1mmol) was added and the mixture cooled to 0° C. in an ice bath. The17α-hydroxy-21-methyl carbonate (125c, 273 mg, 0.54 mmol) was dissolvedin CH₂Cl₂ and cooled to 0° C. and then added to the stirred mixedanhydride. The reaction was complete in 6 hr. Saturated NaHCO₃ was addedto neutralize the reaction and the mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3×). The CH₂Cl₂ extracts were washed with H₂O, brine and dried overanhydrous Na₂SO₄. The solvent was evaporated, benzene was added andevaporated again. CH₂Cl₂ was added and evaporated again. Chromatographyon flash colomn silica gel using CH₂Cl₂:acetone, 95:5 gave a productthat was only 95% pure. Chromatography was run again using the samesystem followed by checking each fraction by HPLC on a NovaPak C₁₈column eluting with MeOH:H₂O:Et₃N (70:30:0.05) at a flow rate of 1 mLper min and at 2=260 nm. Good fractions were collected and combined togive 116.1 mg of the good product. The remainder of the product wasrechromatographed using CH₂Cl₂:EtOAc (90:10) and checking fractions byHPLC as above gave an additional 38.1 mg of the good product. The goodproduct was combined and dried in vacuo to a foam and dried at 45° C. Asmall amount of ether in the product was present. The foam was dried ina vacuum at 80° C. to give 131.6 mg of 126c as a yellow foam in 44.3%yield; m.p.=130-160° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 2961,1759, 1731, 1663, 1612, 1518 and 1278 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.436 (s, 3H,C18-CH₃), 2.125 (s, 3H, C17α-OAc), 2.907 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 3.828 (s,3H, C21-OC(O)OCH₃), 4.391 (d, 1H, C11α-CH), 4.735 and 4.961 (dd, 2H,C21-CH₂—), 5.778 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.638 (d, 2H, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and6.995 (d, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity):549 (M⁺, 32), 489 (7.0), 134 (16.0) and 121 (100.0). Anal. Calcd. forC₃₂H₃₉NO₇: C, 69.92; H, 7.15; N, 2.55. Found: C, 69.62; H, 7.25; N,2.61.

Example 39

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Acetoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-(1′-ethenyloxy)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(129) (FIG. 11):

Step 1.17α,21-(1′-Ethoxyethylidenedioxy)-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(127)

The 17α,21-diol (10) 124, 1.6 g, 3.56 mmol), triethyl orthoacetate (5.59g, 3.45 mmol), and pyridinium tosylate (200 mg, 0.93 mmol) weredissolved in dry benzene in a nitrogen atmosphere and heated at refluxfor 75 min using a Dean Stark trap to remove water. The reaction wascomplete at this time. Pyridine (1 mL) was added and the solvent wasevaporated using nitrogen and vacuum. Water was added and the mixturewas extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The CH₂Cl₂ extracts were washed withH₂O, brine and dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄. The solvent was evaporatedin vacuo. Purification by dry column chromatography, recrystallizationand finally flash column chromatography using CH₂Cl₂:acetone (97:3) gave1.028 g of the ortho ester (127) in 55.8% yield. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.334(s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 1.620 (s, 3H, C17α,21-ethylidenedioxy-CH₃), 2.909 (s,6H, N(CH₃)₂), 3.55 (q, 2H, C21-ethylidendioxy-OCH₂ CH₃), 4.404 (br d,1H, C11α-CH), 5.769 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.641 (d, 2H, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's)and 7.003 (d, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's).

Step 2. 17α-Acetoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-hydroxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (128)

The cyclic ortho ester 127, 1.028 g, 1.99 mmol) was suspended inmethanol (60 mL) in a nitrogen atmosphere and NaOAc solution (8.2 mL,0.1 M) and HOAc solution (16.4 mL, 0.2 M) were added. The mixture washeated at reflux for 3 hr. The solvent was evaporated using nitrogen andvacuum. H₂O (˜50 mL) was added and the mixture was extracted wtih CH₂Cl₂(3×). The organic fractions were washed with H₂O, brine and dried overanhydrous Na₂SO₄ to give 1.0112 g of the 17α-acetoxy-21-hydroxy compound(128) as an off-white powder containing a trace amount of the17α-hydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-acetoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dionecompound (8). The crude product was chromatographed on flash columnsilica gel using CH₂Cl₂:acetone (8:2) as the solvent. Fractions werecollected and each fraction was checked by TLC. Fractions #5-7 wereessentially pure 128 and were combined to give 108.5 mg of good product.The residue was crystallized from ether to give 75 mg of an additionalpure 128. The total amount of the product 128 was 183.5 mg as anoff-white powder in 18.8% yield; m.p.=205-210° C. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.364(s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.112 (s, 3H, C17α-OAc), 2.902 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂),4.190-4.405 (br d and m, 3H, C11α-CH and C21-CH₂—), 5.779 (br s, 1H,C4-CH═), 6.629 (d, 2H, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 6.967 (d, 2H, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's).

Step 3. Preparation of the Target Compound 129

The 21-hydroxy compound (128, 682 mg, 1.39 mmol) was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂(14 mL) in a nitrogen atmosphere and ethyl vinyl ether (5.27 g, 7.32mmol) was added. Mercury (II) trifluoroacetate (25 mg, 0.059 mmol) wasadded and the mixture was stirred in a nitrogen atmosphere at roomtemperature for 22 hr. The mixture was poured onto dry column silica gelwhich had been washed with CH₂Cl₂ in a sintered glass funnel. Thecompound was eluted with EtOAc and the solvent was evaporated in vacuo.The residue (744 mg) was chromatographed on Flash column silica gelusing CH₂Cl₂: acetone (95:5) as the solvent. A total of 141 mg of goodproduct 129 was obtained as a yellow foam in 19.6% yield. The compound129 was dried to remove ether; m.p.=114-116° C. Analysis of 129 by HPLCon a NovaPak C₁₈ column eluted with MeOH:H₂O:Et₃N (70:30:0.05) at a flowrate of 1 mL per min and at λ=260 nm indicated it to be better than 99%pure. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 2948, 1733, 1662, 1613,1560, 1518, 1446, 1369, 1278 and 1235 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.408 (s, 3H,C18-CH₃), 2.118 (s, 3H, C17α-OAc), 2.901 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 4.096-4.662(m, 6H, C21-Ovinyl H, C11α-CH and C21-CH₂—), 5.779 (br s, 1H, C4-CH═),6.625 (d, 2H, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's), and 6.967 (d, 2H, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 517 (M⁺, 73), 134(18.0) and 121 (100.0). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₂H₃₉NO₆.⅓H₂O: C, 73.40; H,7.64; N, 2.67. Found: C, 73.49; H, 7.62; N, 2.84.

Example 40

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Acetoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-(2′-N,N-dimethylamino)acetoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(133) (FIG. 10):

Step 1.17α-Hydroxy-21-(2′-chloroacetoxy)-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(130)

The 17α,21-diol (124, 500 mg, 1.15 mmol) was dissolved in pyridine (7mL) and cooled to 0° C. in an argon atmosphere. Chloroacetic anhydride(705 mg, 4.12 mmol) was dissolved in pyridine and added dropwise to thestirred diol 124 solution. The mixture was stirred at 0° C. for 2 hr.TLC showed very little reaction. The reaction was allowed to warm toroom temperature. Additional chloroacetic anhydride (200 mg, 1.17 mmol)was added and the reaction was continued. When the reaction wascomplete, H₂O (2 mL) was added followed by additional water (70 mL). Themixture was extracted with EtOAc (3×). The EtOAc extracts were washedwith H₂O, brine and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent wasevaporated in vacuo. The mixture was azeotropicaily evaporated withbenzene (2×), dissolved in EtOAc, filtered through Celite and evaporatedin vacuo to give 475 mg of the 21-chloroacetate (130) in 78.3% yield. Itwas used for the next reaction without purification. NMR (DCl₃): δ 0.381(s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.908 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 4.201 (s, 2H, CH₂Cl), 4.999and 5.271 (d, 2H, C21-CH₂—), 5.754 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.669 (d, 2H, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's), and 7.016 (d, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's).

Step 2.17α-Acetoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-(2′-chloroacetoxy)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(131)

Trifluoroacetic anhydride (4.12 g, 19.62 mmol), and acetic acid (1.21 g,20.15 mmol) were added to CH₂Cl₂ (35 mL) in an argon atmosphere andstirred at room temperature for V₂ hr.

p-Toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (155 mg, 5.26 mmol) was added and themixture was cooled to 0° C. The 17α-hydroxy-21-chloroacetate (130, 475mg, 0.97 mmol) was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (10 mL), cooled to 0° C., andadded to the mixed anhydride solution. The mixture was stirred at 0° C.overnight. The reaction was complete. Saturated NaHCO₃ solution wasadded to neutralize the mixture and the mixture was extracted withCH₂Cl₂ (3×). The CH₂Cl₂ extract was washed with H₂O, brine and driedover anhydrous Na₂SO₄. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo.Chromatography on dry column silica gel using CH₂Cl₂:acetone (9:1) assolvent gave 286.2 mg of the 17α-acetoxy-compound 131 in 56% yield. NMR(CDCl₃): δ 0.437 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.130 (s, 3H, 17α-OAc), 2.923 (s, 6H,—N(CH₃)₂), 4.201 (s, 2H, C21-OC(O)CH₂ Cl), 4.395 (d, 1H, C11α-CH), 4.804and 5.041 (d, 2H, C21-CH₂ O—), 5.779 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.697 (d, 2H,3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.017 (d, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's).

Step 3.17α-Acetoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-(2′-iodoacetoxy)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(132)

The 17-acetoxy-21-(2′-chloroacetoxy) compound (131, 286 mg, 0.47 mmol)was dissolved in CH₃CN (50 mL) in an argon atmosphere. NaI (650 mg, 4.34mmol) was added and the mixture was heated at reflux in an argonatmosphere for 45 min. After ½ hr, an aliquot was removed and checked byNMR. The reaction was complete after 2 hr. The mixture was cooled toroom temperature and filtered. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo. Theresidue was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ and filtered to remove solid salts. Thesolid was washed well with CH₂Cl₂ and the solvent was evaporated invacuo to give 328.5 mg of the iodoacetoxy compound 132 in 73% yield. NMR(CDCl₃): δ 0.431 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.133 (s, 3H, C17α-OAc), 2.911 (s,6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 3.812 (d, 2H, C21-CH₂ O), 4.394 (d, 1H, C11α-CH), 4.741and 4.996 (d, 2H, C21-CH₂O—), 5.777 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.677 (d, 2H, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's), and 7.008 (d, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's).

Step 4. Preparation of the Target Compound 133

The 21-iodoacetate (132, 328 mg, 0.52 mmol) was dissolved in THF (25 mL)and cooled to 0° C. in an argon atmosphere. Dimethylamine (2.5 mL, 2 Min THF) was added and the mixture was stirred at 0° C. in an argonatmosphere. TLC after 10 min showed the reaction complete. The solventwas evaporated in vacuo on the rotary evaporator at room temperature.H₂O was added and the mixture was extracted wtih EtOAc (3×). The EtOAcextracts were washed with H₂O, brine and dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄.The solvent was evaporated in vacuo to give 276.8 mg of the crudecompound 133. The crude product was chromatographed on a flash columnusing EtOAc:CH₃CN (70:30). Two fractions were obtained. The firstfraction gave 84.5 mg which was 95% pure by HPLC analysis and the othergave 66.8 mg which was 90% pure by HPLC analysis. Total yield of 133 was151.3 mg as a yellow foam in 58% yield. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance):v_(max) 2947, 1737, 1663, 1612, and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR (CDCl₃): δ 0.440 (s,3H, C18-CH₃), 2.126 (s, 3H, 17α-OAc), 2.386 (s, 6H, —C(O)CH₂N(CH₃)₂),2.906 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 3.308 (t, 2H, C21-OC(O)CH₂ NMe₂), 4.393 (d, 1H,C11α-CH), 4.754 and 5.004 (dd, 2H, 21-CH₂—), 5.773 (s, 1H, C4-CH═),6.643 (d, 2H, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's), and 7.006 (d, 2H, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₄H₄₄N₂O₆.1H₂O: C, 68.69; H, 7.74; N,4.71. Found: C, 68.66; H, 7.80; N, 4.70.

Example 41

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Acetoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-thiocyanato-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(138) (FIG. 11):

Step 1.17α-Hydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-methanesulfonyloxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(136)

Under nitrogen, a solution of the diol (124, 1.0 g, 2.22 mmol) andtriethylamine (0.72 g, 7.11 mmol) in dry pyridine (20 mL) was cooled to0° C. in an ice bath treated with methanesulfonyl chloride (0.74 g, 6.46mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 0° C. and monitored by TLC(10% acetone/CH₂Cl₂) which indicated a complete reaction after twohours. The reaction mixture was diluted with H₂O (˜100 mL) and extractedwith CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractions were washed with H₂O (2×),filtered through Na₂SO₄, combined and concentrated in vacuo to give 1.3g of the residue as a yellow oil. This material was purified by flashchromatography using 10% acetone/CH₂Cl₂ followed by trituration withether to give 0.83 g of the 21-mesylate-17α-ol (136) as a yellow solidin 63.6% yield; m.p.=143-146° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance):v_(max) 3298, 2947, 1738, 1630, 1614, 1518 and 1174 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz,CDCl₃): δ 0.375 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.899 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 3.190 (s, 3H,C21-OSO₂CH₃) 4.371 (br d, 1H, J=6.6 Hz, C11α-CH), 5.128 and 5.353 (dd,2H, J=18 Hz, C21-CH₂—), 5.746 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), 6.645 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz,3′,5′ aromatic-CH's), and 6.994 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's).

Step 2.17α-Hydroxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-thiocyanato-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(1337)

Under nitrogen, a solution of the 21-mesylate-17α-ol 136, 0.65 g, 1.23mmol) and dry potassium thiocyanate (0.3 g, 3.09 mmol) in drydimethylformamide (DMF) (15 mL) was heated to 95-105° C. After about 15min of heating, a very fine precipitate was observed. The reactionmixture was cooled to room temperature, diluted with H₂O (˜100 mL) andextracted first with CH₂Cl₂ (3×) and then with EtOAc (3×) when it becameapparent that the product was not very soluble in CH₂C2. The organicfractions were washed with H₂O (2×), filtered through anhydrous Na₂SO₄,combined and concentrated in vacuo to give a yellow solid residue.Trituration of this material with ether gave 0.598 g of the pure17α-ol-21-thiocyanate (137) as a light yellow solid in 99% yield;m.p.=226° C. (dec). FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3360, 2940,2145, 1728, 1640, 1597 and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.356 (s,3H, C18-CH₃), 2.907 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 4.188 and 4.629 (dd, 2H, J=17.1Hz, C21-CH₂) 4.403 (br d, 1H, J=6.0 Hz, C11α-CH), 5.762 (s, 1H, C4-CH═),6.696 (d, 2H, J=8.4 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's), and 7.023 (d, 2H, J=8.4Hz, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (realtive intensity): 490 (M⁺,25.90), 465 (3.8), 414 (7.8), 389 (6.5), 134 (15.6) and 121 (100.0).Anal. Calcd. for C₂₉H₃₄N₂O₃S.⅘ H₂O: C, 68.96; H, 7.10; N, 5.55; S, 6.35.Found: C, 68.90; H, 6.92; N, 5.58; S, 5.96.

Step 3. Preparation the Target Compound 138

Under nitrogen, trifluoroacetic anhydride (5.20 g, 24.79 mmol), glacialacetic acid (1.57 g, 26.23 mmol) and dry CH₂Cl₂ (5 mL) were combined andstirred at room temperature for 1 hr. p-Toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate(0.05 g, 0.26 mmol) was added, and the reaction mixture was cooled to 0°C. in an ice bath. A solution of the 17α-ol-21-thiocyanate (137, 0.4 g,0.815 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) was added and the reaction mixture wasstirred at 0° C. and monitored by TLC (10% acetone in CH₂Cl₂) whichindicated a complete reaction after 2 hr. The mixture was diluted withH₂O (˜10 mL), stirred at 0° C. for about ½ hr, then carefullyneutralized with dropwise addition of concentrated NH₄OH solution (˜5mL). The mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×). The organic fractionswere washed with H₂O (2×), filtered through anhydrous Na₂SO₄, combinedand concentrated in vacuo to give 0.43 g of the residue as a yellow oil.This material was combined with product obtained from two previousbatches (total amount of crude product=0.675 g from a total of 0.6 g of137). This material was purified via flash chromatography (7.5% acetonein CH₂Cl₂) to give 0.3 g of 138 as a light yellow foam. This materialwas taken up in a minimum amount of CH₂Cl₂, blown down, and the residuetriturated with ether to give 0.256 g of the pure title compound 138 asan off-white solid in 39.3% yield; m.p.=181° C. (dec).

Analysis by HPLC on a Waters NovaPak, C₁₈ column eluted with 0.05 MKH₂PO₄ buffer [pH=3.0]/MeOH, (35:65) at a flow rate of 1 mL per minuteand at λ=302 nm indicated this material to be >99% pure. FTIR (KBr,diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 2935, 2158, 1736, 1658, 1611 and 1518cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.401 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.153 (s, 3H,C17α-OAc), 2.914 (s, 6H, —N(CH₃)₂), 4.060 and 4.236 (dd, 2H, J=16.2 Hz,C21-CH₂) 4.407 (br d, 1H, J=6.9 Hz, C11α-CH), 5.783 (s, 1H, C4-CH═),6.649 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's), and 6.985 (d, 2H, J=9 Hz,2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (realtive intensity): 532 (M⁺, 29.9),134 (13.5) and 121 (100.0). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₁H₃₆N₂O₄S. 1/9H₂O: C,69.64; H, 6.83; N, 5.24; S, 6.00. Found: C, 69.63; H, 6.95; N, 5.12; S,5.84.

Example 42

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Acetoxy-11β-[(4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione3-oxime ((FIG. 4):

Under nitrogen, a solution of the dienedione (71, 200 mg, 0.38 mmol) inabsolute EtOH (25 mL) was treated with a 10-fold excess of solidhydroxylamine hydrochloride (269 mg, 3.87 mmol). The reaction mixturewas stirred at room temperature for 1¼ hr. At that time, TLC (10%acetone in CH₂Cl₂) showed no starting material and two major more polarspots. The reaction was diluted with saturated sodium bicarbonatesolution (100 mL) and extracted with methylene chloride (3×). The orangefractions were washed with water and brine, dried over anhydrous sodiumsulfate, filtered and concentrated in vacuo to yield 290 mg of off-whitepowder. Flash chromatography (10% acetone in methylene chloride) gave177 mg of the material. Trituration with pentane with sonication gave163 mg of 141 as an off-white solid in 80.8% yield after drying. HPLCanalysis indicated a syn:anti ratio of 1:3.2; m.p.=167-172° C. FTIR(KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3237, 2932, 2855, 1735, 1714, 1610,1512, 1452, 1369 and 1236 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHZ, CDCl₃): δ 0306 (s, 3H,C18-CH₃), 2.086 (s, 3H, C17α-OAc), 2.125 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.10 (m, 4H,—CH₂CH₂—N— of piperidine ring) 4.33 (m, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.869 (s, 1H,C4-CH═ of anti-oxime), 6.525 (s, 1H, C4-CH═ of syn-oxime) and6.805-6.975 (dd, 4H, aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity):530 (M⁺). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₃H₄₂O₄N₂: C, 74.72; H, 7.92; N, 5.28.Found: C, 73.73; H, 8.16; N, 5.16.

Example 43

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Methoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione3-oxime (142a) (FIG. 6):

Under nitrogen, a solution of the dienedione (97a, 0.4 g, 0.89 mmol) inabsolute EtOH (25 mL) was treated with a 10-fold excess of solidhydroxylamine hydrochloride (0.62 g, 8.92 mmol). The reaction mixturewas stirred at room temperature for 1 hr, after which time TLC (10%acetone/methylene chloride, overspotted with con.

NH₄OH) indicated a complete reaction. The reaction mixture was dilutedwith water (˜100 mL), adjusted to a pH of ˜8.0 with concentrated NH₄OHsolution, and extracted with methylene chloride (3×). The organicfractions were purified via flash chromatography (10% acetone/methylenechloride) followed by trituration with pentane to give the purifiedoxime (142a, 0.22 g) as an off-white amorphous solid in 53% yield;m.p.=148-162° C.

Analysis by NMR indicated this material to consist of a mixture of 39:61ratio of the syn and anti-isomers. HPLC analysis on a Waters NovaPak C₁₈ODS column eluted with acetonitrile/0.05 M KH₂PO₄ [pH=3.0] 1:1 at a flowrate of 1 mL per min and at λ=276 nm indicated a purity of 96.5%. FTIR(KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3270, 2942, 1708, 1613 and 1517cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHZ, CDCl₃): δ 0.259 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃ of anti-isomer),0.269 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃ of syn-isomer), 2.176 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃ ofsyn-isomer), 2.182 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃ of anti-isomer), 2.898 (s, 6H,—NMe₂), 3.150 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃), 4.298 (br d, 1H, J=7.2 Hz, C11α-CH),5.840 (s, 0.64H, C4-CH═ of anti-oxime), 6.490 (s, 0.37H, C4-CH═ ofsyn-oxime), 6.638 (m, 2H, 3′,5′ aromatic-CH's) and 7.012 (m, 2H, 2′,6′aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 462 (100, M⁺), 446(43.4), 431 (15.9), 134 (38.5) and 121 (48.3). Anal. Calcd. forC₂₉H₃₈N₂O₃.⅕H₂O: C, 74.71; H, 8.30; N, 6.01. Found: C, 74.65; H, 8.31;N, 6.03.

Example 44

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α-Methoxy-11β-[4-(N-piperidino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione3-oxime (142b) (FIG. 6):

Under nitrogen, a solution of the dienedione 97b, 250 mg, 0.513 mmol) inabsolute EtOH (25 mL) was treated with a 10-fold excess of solidhydroxylamine hydrochloride (38 mg, 5.13 mmol). The reaction mixture wasstirred at room temperature for 1¼ hr. At that time, TLC (10% acetone inmethylene chloride) showed no starting material and two major more polarproducts. The reaction was diluted with saturated sodium bicarbonatesolution (100 mL) and extracted with methylene chloride (3×). Theorganic fractions were washed with water and brine, dried over anhydroussodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated in vacuo to yield 260 mg ofyellow foam. Flash chromatography (10% acetone in methylene chloride)gave 186 mg of the material. Trituration with pentane with scratchingand sonication gave 172 mg of the product 142b after drying. HPLCanalysis indicated this material to be 94% pure. Two additional flashcolumn chromatography, trituration with pentane and drying again invacuo yielded 143 g of 142b as an off-white solid in 55.5% yield;m.p.=157-162° C. (amber gel) and 195-200° C. (gel melts). HPLC analysison a Waters NovaPak C₁₈ ODS column eluted with MeOH:water (80:20) with0.05% Et₃N at a flow rate of 1 mL per min and at 2=260 nm indicated apurity of 97.9%. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3183, 2934,1707, 1610, 1511, 1450, 1385, 1349 and 1234 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHZ, CDCl₃):δ 0.239 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.175 (s, 3H, C21-CH₃), 3.07-3.150 (m, 4H,—N—CH₂CH₂— of piperidine ring), 3.13 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃), 4.28-4.30 (d,1H, C11α-CH), 5.840 (s, 0.69H, C4-CH═ of anti-oxime), 6.493 (s, 0.31H,C4-CH═ of syn-oxime), 6.8-7.0 (dd, 4H, aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 502 (M⁺). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₂H₄₂O₃N₂: 76.46; H,8.42; N, 5.57. Found: C, 75.38; H, 8.60; N, 5.39

Example 45

This example illustrates the preparation and properties of17α,21-dimethoxy-11β-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione3-oxime (143) (FIG. 8):

A solution of the 17α,21-dimethoxydienedione (113a, 0.3 g, 0.63 mmol) inabsolute EtOH (20 mL) was treated with a 10-fold excess of solidhydroxylamine hydrochloride (0.44 g, 6.3 mmol). The reaction mixture wasstirred at room temperature for 2.5 h, after which time, TLC (10%acetone in methylene chloride, overspotted with con. NH₄OH) indicated acomplete reaction. The reaction mixture was diluted with water (˜100mL), adjusted to pH of ˜8.0 with concentrated NH₄OH solution, andextracted with methylene chloride (3×). The organic fractions werewashed with water (3×) then filtered through anhydrous sodium sulfate,combined and concentrated in vacuo to give 0.37 g of the crude product(143) as a yellow foam. This material was purified via flashchromatography (10% acetone in methylene chloride) followed bytrituration with pentane to give 0.17 g of the purified oxime (143).Analysis by HPLC on a Waters NovaPak C₁₈ ODS column eluted withacetonitrile:0.05 M KH₂PO₄ buffer [pH 3.0]; 1:1 at a flow rate of 1 mLper min and at λ=276 nm indicated a purity of only 92%. This materialwas repurified via flash chromatography (10% acetone/methylene chloride)followed by precipitation from acetonitrile with water to give 0.11 g of143 as a white powder in 35.5% yield for which HPLC analysis indicatedit to be 96.2% pure; m.p. 129-135° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse refelectance):v_(max) 3290, 2938, 1722, 1613 and 1518 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHZ, CDCl₃): δ0.288 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.898 (s, 6H, NMe₂), 3.165 (s, 3H, C17α-OCH₃),3.454 (s, 3H, C21-OCH₃), 4.245 and 4.380 (dd, 2H, J=17.9 Hz, C21-CH₂)4.301 (d, 1H, J=6.9 Hz, C11α-CH), 5.842 (s, 0.82H, C4-CH═ ofanti-oxime), 6.496 (s, 0.18H, C4-CH═ of syn-oxime), 6.633 (m, 2H, 3′,5′aromatic-CH's) and 6.997 (m, 2H, 2′,6′ aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z(relative intensity): 492 (M+, 100), 476 (12.9), 134 (59.8) and 121(65.0). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₀H₄₀N₂O₄. 1/10H₂O: C, 72.87; H, 8.19; N,5.67. Found: C, 72.97; H, 8.18; N, 5.44.

Example 46

This example illustrates an unusual and novel oxidative N-demethylationmethod and properties of17α-acetoxy-11β-[4-(N-methylamino)phenyl]-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(145) (FIG. 3):

A mixture of the dimethylaminophenyl compound (38, 500 mg, 0.98 mmol)and calcium oxide (471 mg, 8.40 mmol) in THF (4 mL) and methanol (3 mL)was chilled in an ice bath. Iodine (1.255 g, 4.94 mmol) in THF (2 mL)was added. The reaction was stirred at 0° C. for 1.5 hr and diluted withCH₂Cl₂. The mixture was filtered and the filtrate sequentially yielded591 mg of crude material. Flash chromatography using 10% acetone inCH₂Cl₂ gave 204 mg of 145 as an off-white solid in 49% yield. This wascombined with material from other reactions (170 mg total) and purifiedas one batch. Two flash column chromatographies yielded 296 mg ofmaterial which was triturated with pentane accompanied with scratchingand sonication. After drying in vacuo, 280 mg of 145 were obtained;m.p.=177-182° C. FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3407, 2949,1733, 1662, 1615, 1519, 1448, 1370 and 1236 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHZ, CDCl₃):δ 0.403 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃), 2.105 (s, 3H, C17α-OAc), 2.796 (s, 3H, —NCH₃),3.412 (s, 3H, 21-OCH₃), 4.073-4.333 (dd, 2H, 21-CH₂ OMe), 4.352-4.376(d, 1H, C11α-CH), 5.775 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), and 6.489-6.933 (dd, 4H,aromatic-CH's). MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 491 (M⁺). Anal. Calcd.for C₃₀H₃₇NO₅: C, 73.29; H, 7.59; N, 2.85. Found: C, 73.22; H, 7.84; N,2.87. Analysis by HPLC on a Waters Assoc. NovaPak C₁₈ column eluted withMeOH/H₂O (65:35) with 0.05% Et₃N at a flow rate of 1 mL per min and atλ=260 nm indicated a purity of 98.1% of 145.

Example 47

This example illustrates an unusual and novel oxidative N-demethylationmethod and properties of17α,21-diacetoxy-11β-[4-(N-methylamino)phenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione(144):

This compound was prepared in a manner similar to that of the aboveExample 46. Our initial concern was whether the 21-acetate would undergohydrolysis when exposed to the demethylation reaction conditions.Treatment of the dimethylaminophenyl compound (15) with iodine-calciumoxide in THF/MeOH proceeded similarly and smoothly to that of Example 46without hydrolysis of the 21-acetate.

A mixture of the dimethylaminophenyl compound (15, 775 mg, 1.45 mmol)and calcium oxide (692 mg, 12.34 mmol) in THF (6.4 mL) and MeOH (4.8 mL)was chilled in an ice bath. Iodine (1.84 g, 7.25 mmol) was added as asolid and the mixture stirred under nitrogen in the ice bath for 2 hr.At that time the reaction was diluted with CH₂Cl₂ and filtered. Thefiltrate was washed with 15% sodium thiosulfate solution, H₂O, brine,and then dried over Na₂SO₄. Evaporation of the solvent yielded 1.38 g ofthe crude product (144). Flash column chromatography using 10% acetonein CH₂Cl₂ gave 490 mg of the product (44) as an off-white solid in 65%yield which was 90% pure by HPLC. This was combined with material fromother batches (135 mg) and after two additional flash columnchromatographies yielded 482 g which was 92% pure. An additional flashcolumn chromatography was performed followed by trituration of thematerial with pentane, sonication and scratching. 330 mg of thedemethylated product (144) were obtained; m.p.=135-142° C. FTIR (KBr,diffuse reflectance): v_(max) 3394, 2942, 2883, 1737, 1662, 1613, 1519,1370 and 1234 cm⁻¹. NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 0.448 (s, 3H, C18-CH₃),1.266 (s, 1H, —NH), 2.134-2.176 (s, 6H, C17α-OAc and C21-OAc), 2.810 (s,3H, —NCH₃), 4.375-4.399 (d, 1H, C11α-CH), 4.670-4.981 (dd, 2H, 21-CH₂OAc), 5.787 (s, 1H, C4-CH═), and 6.523-6.980 (dd, 4H, aromatic-CH's). MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity): 519 (M⁺). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₁H₃₇NO₆: C,71.65; H, 7.18; N, 2.70. Found: C, 71.59; H, 7.31; N, 2.59. Analysis byHPLC on a Waters Assoc. NovaPak C₁₈ column eluted with CH₃CN/H₂O (50:50)with 0.05% Et₃N at a flow rate of 1 mL per min and at 2=260 nm indicateda purity of 98.8% of 144.

Biological Properties of the Compounds of Formula I Materials andMethods Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using standard methods and a PROPHETdata management system operating on SUN Microsystems OS 4.4.1 (Bliss, CI., The Statistics of Bioassay, New York, Academic Press (1952);Hollister, C., Nucleic Acids Research, 16:1873-1875 (1988)). Raw data,statistical and regression analysis are available.

AntiMcGinty Test (McGinty, et al., Endocrinology, 24:829-832 (1939))

Immature female rabbits of the New Zealand White breed (approx. 1 kgbody weight) were maintained under standard laboratory conditions andreceived a subcutaneous injection of 5 μg estradiol in 10%ethanol/sesame oil daily for 6 consecutive days. Twenty-four hours afterthe last injection of estradiol (day 7) animals underwent sterileabdominal surgery to ligate a 3-4 cm segment of both uterine horns. Theexperimental compound in appropriate solvent (usually 10% ethanol/sesameoil) was injected intraluminally into the ligated segment of one uterinehorn and the vehicle alone into the ligated segment of the contralateralhorn. Injection volume was limited to 0.1 ml, and care was taken toprevent leakage. A stimulating dose of progesterone (0.8 mg/day) wasadministered subcutaneously to each rabbit daily for the next three days(days 7, 8 and 9) for the purpose of inducing endometrial proliferation.All animals were sacrificed on day 10 when a segment central to theligatures was removed and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin andsubmitted for histological processing. Five micron sections stained withhematoxylin and eosin (H&E) were evaluated microscopically for thedegree of endometrial glandular proliferation according to the method ofMcPhail (McPhail, J. Physiol., 83:145 (1934). The percent inhibition ofendometrial proliferation for each rabbit was calculated and the mean ofthe group of five animals recorded.

AntiClauberg Test (Clauberg, C., Zentr. Gynakol., 54:2757-2770 (1930))

Immature female rabbits of the New Zealand White breed (approx. 1 kgbody weight) were maintained under standard laboratory conditions andreceived a subcutaneous injection of 5 μg estradiol in 10%ethanol/sesame oil daily for 6 consecutive days. Twenty-four hours afterthe last dose of estradiol (day 7) animals received progesterone bysubcutaneous injection (0.8 mg/day) and the experimental compound inappropriate vehicle (usually 10% ethanol/sesame oil) orally orsubcutaneously for five consecutive days. One group of rabbits receivedprogesterone only. Twenty-four hours after the last dose all animalswere sacrificed for removal of the uterus which was cleaned of all fatand connective tissue, weighed to the nearest 0.2 mg and placed in 10%neutral buffered formalin for subsequent histological processing. Fivemicron sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) were evaluatedmicroscopically for the degree of endometrial glandular proliferationaccording to the method of McPhail (McPhail, supra). The percentinhibition of endometrial proliferation at each dose level of theexperimental compound was derived by comparison with theprogesterone-stimulated animals alone.

Postcoital Test

Adult female rats of the Sprague-Dawley strain were maintained understandard laboratory conditions, 14 hours of light and 10 hours ofdarkness each day and cohabited with proven fertile males when inproestrus. Sperm-positive animals were randomly assigned to control andexperimental groups. The day vaginal sperm were found in vaginalwashings constituted day 0 of gestation. Rats received experimentalcompounds or vehicle (control) daily by the oral route on days 0-3 or4-6 and were sacrificed between days 10 and 17 to record the number andcondition of conceptuses.

Antiovulatory Test

Immature female rats of the Sprague-Dawley strain weighing 200 to 250 gwere maintained under standard laboratory conditions, 14 hours of lightand 10 hours of darkness each day. Vaginal washings were obtained dailyand evaluated microscopically to establish the estrous cycle of eachanimal. Animals exhibiting two consecutive four-day cycles were used inthe test. Each dose group consisted of eight rats and one group servedas the vehicle control. Animals were dosed at noon on the day ofproestrus and sacrificed 24 hours later when ova can usually bevisualized in the distended ampulla of the oviduct using a dissectingmicroscope. The oviducts were excised, an incision made in the distendedampulla and the ova teased out in a drop of water on a microscope slideso that the number shed could be counted. Historically, control animalsshed between 12 and 14 ova during each estrous cycle. Agents whichinhibit ovulation usually exhibit an “all or none” effect; it is rarethat ovulation is “partially” inhibited. Treatment groups were comparedwith the control group using a 95% contingency table or the ED₁₀₀ wasestablished with additional dose levels.

Relative Binding Affinities for the Progesterone and GlucocorticoidReceptors

Uteri and thymus glands were obtained from estradiol-primed immaturefemale rabbits of the New Zealand White strain for preparation ofcytosols for the progesterone and glucocorticoid receptor assays,respectively. Tissues were excised and immediately placed in ice coldTEGDM buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.4; 1.5 mM EDTA; 10% glycerol vol/vol/; 1mM dithiothreitol [DTT]; and 20 mM sodium molybdate). The tissues weredissected free of connective tissue and fat, weighed and minced finely.Minced tissues were homogenized in 3 volumes TEGDM/gm with four 10second bursts of a VirTis Cyclone set at half maximum speed with a 30second cooling period (in ice) between bursts. Homogenates werecentrifuged at 109,663 g at 4° C. for 1 hour to yield the solublecytosol fraction. Aliquots of cytosol were snap frozen and stored at−75° C.

All binding assays were carried out at 2-6° C. for 16-18 hours. Thefollowing radioactive ligands were used: [1,2-³H(N)]-progesterone (50.0Ci/mmole) for the progesterone receptor (PR). [6,7-³H(N)-dexamethasone(39.2 Ci/mmole) for the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and[2,4,6,7-³H(N)]-estradiol for the estrogen receptor. For theprogesterone receptor RBA assays 0.02 ml uterine cytosol or TEDGMbuffer, 0.05 ml of various concentrations of test compounds orprogesterone, 0.13 ml TEGDM buffer and 0.05 ml [³H]-progesterone wereadded to duplicate tubes. For the glucocorticoid receptor RBA assays 0.1ml thymus cytosol or TEDGM buffer, 0.05 ml of various concentrations oftest compounds or dexamethasone, 0.05 ml TEGDM buffer and 0.05 ml[³H]-dexamethasone were added to duplicate tubes. For the estrogenreceptor RBA assays 0.05 ml uterine cytosol, 0.1 ml TEGDM buffer, 0.05ml of various concentrations of test compounds or estradiol and 0.05 ml[³H]-estradiol were added to duplicate tubes. The concentrations of thetest compounds, progesterone, dexamethasone and estradiol ranged from0.05 to 100 nM and the concentrations of the competitors ranged from 0.5to 500 nM. Total binding was measured at radioligand concentrations of3.5 nM and nonspecific binding was measured in the presence of a200-fold excess of unlabeled progesterone (PR), dexamethasone (GR) ordiethylstilbestrol (ER), respectively.

In all incubations bound and free ligand were separated usingdextra-coated charcoal (DCC). A 0.1 ml aliquot of DCC (0.5%charcoal/0.05% Dextran T-70) was added to each tube. The tubes werevortexed and incubated on ice for 10 minutes. Five-tenths ml TEG buffer(without DTT or molybdate) was then added to all tubes to improvesupernatant recovery following centrifugation. The charcoal was pelletedby centrifugation at 2,100 g for 15 minutes at 4° C. The supernatantscontaining the [³H]-steroid receptor complexes were decanted into vialscontaining 4 ml Optifluor (Packard Instrument Co.), vortexed,equilibrated in a liquid scintillation counter for 30 minutes and thencounted for 2 minutes. This provided the quantity of receptor bound[³H]-steroid at each competitor concentration.

The standard curves and the EC₅₀ (Effective Concentration) for eachstandard curve and curve for each test compound was determined byentering the counting data (receptor bound [³H]-progesterone,[³H]-dexamethasone or [³H]-estradiol) into a four parameter sigmoidalcomputer program (RiaSmart® Immunoassay Data Reduction Program, PackardInstrument Co., Meriden, Conn. The RBA for each test compound wascalculated using the following equation:

${R\; B\; A} = {\frac{{EC}_{50}\mspace{14mu} {Standard}}{{EC}_{50}\mspace{14mu} {Test}\mspace{14mu} {Compound}} \times 100}$

where EC₅₀ Standard=molar concentration of unlabeled progesterone,dexamethasone or estradiol required to decrease bound [³H]-progesterone(PR), [³H]-dexamethasone (GR) or [³H]-estradiol to 50% of the respectivebuffer control (100% bound radioligand) and EC₅₀ Test Compound=molarconcentration of test compound required to decrease bound[³H]-progesterone (PR), [³H]-dexamethasone (GR) or [³H]-estradiol to 50%of the respective buffer control (100% bound radioligand).

Results Example 1

Results of the antiMcGinty and oral antiClauberg tests as well as therelative binding affinities of these compounds are shown in Table 1,infra. Compared to the lead compound (CDB-2914, 21-H), the 21-acetoxy(15) and the 21-methoxy (38) analogs exhibited 2.79 and 3.61 times,respectively, the antiprogestational potency as assessed by the oralantiClauberg test with a substantial reduction in glucocorticoid bindingaffinity. Further, the results of the antiMcGinty test of the 21-acetoxyanalog (15) following intraluminal administration closely paralleledthose observed in the antiClauberg test following oral dosing. Sincemifepristone (CDB-2477) is frequently used as a reference standard,Table 2, infra, contains data comparing the antiprogestational activityand relative binding affinity for the progesterone and glucocorticoidreceptors of CDB-2914 with this standard. Recent studies have shown agood correlation between relative binding affinity for theglucocorticoid receptor and a biological test based upon the antagonismof dexamethasone-induced thymus involution in adrenalectomized malerats.

The halogenated analogs (13, 14A, 14B) did not show significantdifferences in antiprogestational activity nor relative binding affinityto the progesterone receptor from the lead compound, CDB-2914. Other21-substituted analogs generally exhibited reduced antiprogestationalactivity with the exception of the cypionate 40 which was about 50% morepotent in the antiClauberg test. This may be due to hydrolysis to thecorresponding 21-hydroxy compound. However, the presence of additionalbulkiness at position 21 does not always favor an increase in biologicalactivity (see 14B) and enhanced relative binding affinity for theprogesterone receptor was not necessarily indicative of greaterantiprogestational activity (see 12). Thus the window of opportunity forenhanced antiprogestational activity with a reduction in relativebinding affinity for the glucocorticoid receptor for 21-substitutedanalogs of the lead compound (CDB-2914) is highly restricted and wasidentified only after numerous analogs had been synthesized and tested.

TABLE 1 ANTIPROGESTATIONAL ACTIVITY AND RELATIVE BINDING AFFINITY FORTHE PROGESTERONE AND GLUCOCORTICOID RECEPTORS ANTIPROGES- RELATIVEBINDING COMPOUND TATIONAL¹ AFFINITY² Appln. CDB Anti- Anti- Proges-Glucocor- No. No. McGinty Clauberg terone ticoid  69B 2914 100 100 122114 12 4062 26 29 261 32 13 4058 103 80 125 109  14A 3876 75 68 127 90 14B 4031 71 130 175 15 4059 300 279 103 51 16 4102 >2 6 77 17 4101 6537 54 28 4030 32 129 126 38 4124 361 103 52 40 4125 155 74 37 41 4152140 62 71 46 4167 130-210 83 46 ¹Antiprogestational ActivityAntiMcGinty: see text; CDB-2914 = 100 (assigned) AntiClauberg, oral: seetext; CDB-2914 = 100 (assigned) ²Relative Binding Affinity Progesteronereceptor (estrogen-primed rabbit uterus) progesterone = 100%Glucocorticoid receptor (estrogen-primed rabbit thymus) dexamethasone =100%

TABLE 2 BINDING AFFINITY¹ BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY CDB NO. COMPOUND NO.Progester Glucocortic antiClauberg² Postcoital³ Antiovulator⁴ 2914  69B122 (234) 114 100 2 1 3875  69A 164 30 97 3247  69C 91 49 ~10  2* 3248 69D 40 89 weak (subcu) inactive @2* 4243  91 171 59 inactive 4418  7079 /2 ~25 4363  71 123 (203) 20 253   0.5 >16 4399  72 109 110 35 4176 74 131 32 <10 4324  97a 120 52 110 4398  97b 47 38 99 4455 106a 4241106b 136 (172) 14 34 4400 113A 117 (237) 62 229 4454 113B 59 34 4417113c 63 45 70 4239 123a 174 (140) 11 45-83 4416 123b 64 45 77 4393 13930 79 inactive 4247 126a 95 43 170 4362 126b 76 15 125 4374 126c 68 67224 4361 129 155 20 303 4306 133 82 13 95 4352 138 63 14 57¹Progesterone receptor (estrogen-primed rabbit uterus); progesterone =100% Figure in ( ) is relative binding affinity of the human isoform Aprogesterone receptor Glucocorticoid receptor (estrogen-primed rabbitthymus) dexamethasone = 100%. ²antiClauberg - oral except whereindicated; CDB-2914 = 100 (assigned). ³Postcoital - oral, rat MED₁₀₀(mg/day) days 0-3 or *days 4-6 subcu; day sperm in vaginal washings =day 0. ⁴Antiovulatory - oral, rat MED₁₀₀(mg) single dose at noon on dayof proestrus.

TABLE 3 RELATIVE BINDING AFFINITIES AND ANTIPROGESTATION ACTIVITY OFCDB-2914 AND MIFEPRISTONE (CDB-2477) RELATIVE BINDING AFFINITYANTIPROGESTATIONAL ACTIVITY DRUG PROGESTERONE¹ GLUCOCORTICOID²ANTIMCGINITY³ ANTICLAUBERG⁴ CDB-2914  114- (n = 18) 127-24 (n = 12) 0.563.27 CDB-2477 150-17 (n = 11) 221-35 (n = 6)  1.0 (assigned) 1.0(assigned) ¹Progesterone = 100%; immature estrogen-primed rabbit uterus²Dexamethasone = 100%; immature estrogen-primed rabbit thymus³Intraluminal administration to estrogen-primed immature rabbits;CDB-2477 = 1.0 (assigned) ⁴Oral administration to estrogen-primedimmature rabbits; CDB-2477 = 1.0 (assigned)

Example 2 AntiClauberg

Data from antiClauberg tests following oral administration are shown inTables 1 and 2. Compounds 15, 38, 40, 41, 46, 71, 97a, 113a, 126a, 126b,126c and 129 exhibited greater activity than the standard, 69B. Previousstudies have shown that 69B is significantly more potent thanmifepristone (3.27×; 95% C.I.=1.41-7.58) in this test. Compounds 15, 38,71 and 129 represent four of the most potent antiprogestationalcompounds known, and their low binding affinity for the glucocorticoidreceptor would predict minimal antiglucocorticoid activity.

Postcoital

Compound 71 exhibited about four times the postcoital contraceptiveactivity of the standard, compound 69B, following oral administration ondays 0-3 of gestation.

Antiovulatory

Compound 71 was not fully active at a dose level 16 times the MED₁₀₀ forthe standard, compound 69B, and compound 113a exhibited only about 6% ofthe antiovulatory activity of the standard.

Relative Binding Affinity for the Progesterone and GlucocorticoidReceptors

Relative binding affinities for the progesterone receptor(estrogen-primed rabbit uterine cytosol) and glucocorticoid receptor(estrogen-primed rabbit thymic cytosol) are shown in Table 1. Severalcompounds were also tested for binding affinity for the human isoform Aprogesterone receptor. Compounds 12, 13, 14A, 14B, 15, 28, 38, 69A, 91,71, 72, 73, 97a, 106b, 113a, 113d, 122b and 129 showed bindingaffinities greater than that observed for the standard, compound 69B. Onthe other hand, most of the compounds tested exhibited reduced bindingaffinity for both the progesterone and the glucocorticoid receptor.

DISCUSSION

Many members of a series of derivatives of 19-norprogesterone possesspotent antiprogestational activity following oral administration inexperimental animals. They exhibit high binding affinity for theprogesterone receptor (rabbit uterine) and only modest relative bindingaffinity for the glucocorticoid receptor (rabbit thymus). This isreflected in standard antiprogestational assays showing stronginhibition of progesterone-induced alterations of rabbit uterineendometrium. It is anticipated that the reduced binding affinity for theglucocorticoid receptor will reflect diminished biologicalantiglucocorticoid activity.

Table 3 compares the relative binding affinity for the progesterone andglucocorticoid receptors as well as the antiprogestational activity asmeasured by antiClauberg and antiMcGinty tests for the standard,compound 69B, and mifepristone (CDB-2477). Mifepristone exhibitedgreater binding affinity for both receptor proteins and was more potentthan the standard, compound 69B, in the antiMcGinty test. However, thestandard was 3 times as potent as mifepristone in the antiClauberg testfollowing oral administration. This finding has not been satisfactorilyexplained, but may be due to the differential pharmacokinetics of thesetwo steroids following oral administration. Higher blood levels of 69Bhave been observed following oral administration to several species,thus indicating a greater oral bioavailable for the standard.

Antiprogestational agents including mifepristone are known to preventimplantation in the rat (Dao, B., et al., Contraception, 54:243-258(1996); Reel, J., et al., Contraception, 58:129-136 (1998)), guinea pig(Batista, M., et al., Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 165:82-86 (1991), and man(Baulieu, E., Clinical Applications of Mifepristone (RU 486) and OtherAntiprogestins (Donaldson, M., Dorflinger, L., Brown, S, and Benet, L.(eds.), National Academy Press, pp. 72-119 (1993)). Compound 71 was fourtimes as potent as the standard, compound 69B, in preventing pregnancywhen orally administered on days 0-3 of presumptive gestation.Curiously, compound 71 was only about 5% as potent as the standard ininhibiting ovulation. Both compound 69B and mifepristone have been shownto inhibit ovulation in the rat (Dao, et al., supra), and mifepristonehas been shown to affect ovulation in human subjects (Baulieu, et al.,supra). Compound 69B has been shown to affect both folliculardevelopment and ovulation as well as endometrial maturation in humansubjects following a single oral dose (unpublished data).

Compound 113a exhibited high binding affinity for both the rabbitprogesterone receptor (isoform B) and the human progesterone receptor(isoform A). This was reflected in potent antiprogestational activity invivo where it was more than twice as active at the standard, compound69B. It also showed reduced binding affinity for the glucocorticoidreceptor and was about half as effective as compound 69B in preventingpregnancy in the postcoital test. Strangly, this compound was only 6% asactive as the standard in inhibiting ovulation. Thus, compound 113a mayrepresent an antiprogestational steroid with high tissue specificity.

It is understood that the examples and embodiments described herein arefor illustrative purposes only and that various modifications or changesin light thereof will be suggested to persons skilled in the art and areto be included within the spirit and purview of this application andscope of the appended claims. All publications, patents, and patentapplications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference for allpurposes.

1-60. (canceled)
 61. A compound having the general formula:

wherein: R¹ is a member selected from the group consisting of —OCH₃,—SCH₃, —N(CH₃)₂, —NHCH₃, —NC₄H₈, —NC₅H₁₀, —NC₄H₈O, —CHO, —CH(OH)CH₃,—C(O)CH₃, —O(CH₂)₂N(CH₃)₂, —O(CH₂)₂NC₄Hs, and —O(CH₂)₂NC₅H₁₀; R² is amember selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, halogen, alkyl,acyl, hydroxy, alkoxy, acyloxy, alkylcarbonate, cypionyloxy, S-alkyl,—SCN, S-acyl, and —OC(O)R⁶, wherein R⁶ is a member selected from thegroup consisting of alkyl, alkoxy ester and alkoxy; R³ is a memberselected from the group consisting of alkyl, hydroxy, alkoxy andacyloxy; R⁴ is a member selected from the group consisting of hydrogenand alkyl; and X is a member selected from the group consisting of ═Oand ═N—OR⁵, wherein R⁵ is a member selected from the group consisting ofhydrogen and alkyl.
 62. The compound in accordance with claim 61,wherein R¹ is a member selected from the group consisting of —N(CH₃)₂,—NC₄H₈, —NC₄H₈O, —C(O)CH₃, —O(CH₂)₂N(CH₃)₂, —O(CH₂)₂NC₄H₈, and—O(CH₂)₂NC₅H₁₀.
 63. The compound in accordance with claim 61, wherein R²is a member selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyloxy,alkoxy, —SAc, —SCN, —OC(O)CH₂N(CH₃)₂, and —OC(O)R⁶, wherein R⁶ is amember selected from the group consisting of alky, alkoxy ester andalkoxy.
 64. The compound in accordance with claim 63, wherein R² is—OC(O)R⁶ and R⁶ is a member selected from the group consistingof-CH₂CH₃, —CH₂OCH₃, and —OCH₃.
 65. The compound in accordance withclaim 61, wherein R² is an alkoxy selected from the group consisting ofmethoxy, ethoxy, vinyloxy, ethynyloxy and cyclopropyloxy.
 66. Thecompound in accordance with claim 61, wherein R³ is a member selectedfrom the group consisting of alkyl, alkoxy, acyloxy and hydroxy.
 67. Thecompound in accordance with claim 61, wherein R⁴ is alkyl.
 68. Thecompound in accordance with claim 61, wherein X is ═O.
 69. The compoundin accordance with claim 61, wherein X is ═N—OR⁵.
 70. The compound inaccordance with claim 61, wherein R³ is acyloxy selected from the groupconsisting of —OC(O)H, —OC(O)CH₂CH₃ and —OC(O)C₆H₁₃.
 71. The compound inaccordance with claim 61, wherein the compound is: R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² ishydrogen; R³ is methoxymethyl; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹ is —NC₄H₈;R² is hydrogen; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹ is —NC₅H₁₀;R² is hydrogen; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹ is —NC₄H₈O;R² is hydrogen; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹ is—C(O)CH₃; R² is hydrogen; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹is —SCH₃; R² is hydrogen; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is hydrogen; R³ is methoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O;R¹ is —NC₅H₁₀; R² is hydrogen; R³ is methoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O;R¹ is —NC₅H₁₀; R² is acetoxy; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O;R¹ is —C(O)CH₃; R² is acetoxy; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O;R¹ is —C(O)CH₃; R² is —SAc; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹is —C(O)CH₃; R² is methoxy; R³ is methoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is methoxy; R³ is methoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R₁is —N(CH₃)₂; R₂ is methoxy; R³ is ethoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹is —NC₄H₈; R² is methoxy; R³ is methoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹is —NC₅H₁₀; R² is methoxy; R³ is methoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹is —NC₅H₁₀; R² is methoxy; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹is —C(O)CH₃; R² is methoxy; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹is —O(CH₂)₂N(CH₃)₂; R² is methoxy; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is═O; R¹ is —O(CH₂)₂NC₄H₈; R² is methoxy; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; andX is ═O; R¹ is —O(CH₂)₂NC₅H₁₀; R² is methoxy; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ ismethyl; and X is ═O; R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is —OC(O)CH₂CH₃; R³ is acetoxy;R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is —OC(O)CH₂OCH₃; R³ isacetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is —OC(O)OCH₃; R³is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is —OCH═CH₂;R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is—OCH═CH₂; R³ is methoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R²is —OCH═CH₂; R³ is ethoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R²is —SCN; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is—OC(O)H; R³ is —OC(O)H; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is—OC(O)H; R³ is hydroxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is—OC(O)CH₂N(CH₃)₂; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹ is—NC₅H₁₀; R² is hydrogen; R³ is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═N—OR⁵,wherein R⁵ is hydrogen; R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is hydrogen; R³ is methoxy;R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═N—OR⁵, wherein R⁵ is hydrogen; R¹ is —NC₅H₁₀; R²is hydrogen; R³ is methoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═N—OR⁵, wherein R⁵ ishydrogen; R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² is methoxy; R³ is methoxy; R⁴ is methyl;and X is ═N—OR⁵, wherein R⁵ is hydrogen; R¹ is —NHCH₃; R² is methoxy; R³is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; R¹ is —NHCH₃; R² is acetoxy; R³is acetoxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O; or R¹ is —N(CH₃)₂; R² ishydrogen; R³ is acyloxy; R⁴ is methyl; and X is ═O.
 72. A pharmaceuticalcomposition comprising a compound in accordance with claim 61 and apharmaceutically acceptable excipient.
 73. A method of producing anantiprogestational effect in a patient, a method of inducing menses in apatient, a method of treating endometriosis, a method of treatingdysmenorrhea, a method of treating endocrine hormone-dependent tumors, amethod of treating meningiomas, a method of treating uterine fibroids ina patient, a method of inhibiting uterine endometrial proliferation in apatient, a method of inducing labor, a method of providingcontraception, or a method of providing postcoital contraception, saidmethod comprising administering to a patient an effective amount of acompound in accordance with claim 61.